Evaluative conditioning (EC), a change in liking of a stimulus due to its paired presentation with a positive or negative stimulus, is a key concept in attitude formation. The present article examines to what extent EC effects are moderated by Big Five personality. For this purpose, 567 participants completed an EC procedure and the Big Five Inventory. People high on neuroticism and agreeableness showed stronger EC effects than people low on those personality traits. In conclusion, attitude formation via EC depends in part on Big Five personality. This novel insight has important ramifications for EC research and personality research. As to EC research, the moderation by neuroticism suggests that EC effects intensify with an increased focus on valent stimuli. As to personality research, our findings reinforce the fundamental nature of the Big Five because they are evidentially able to moderate such basic learning phenomena as EC.
AlujaA.BlanchA.BlancoE.BaladaF. (2015). Affective modulation of the startle reflex and the Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of personality: The role of sensitivity to reward. Physiology & Behavior, 138, 332–339. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.09.009
2.
ArmstrongT.OlatunjiB. O. (2012). Eye tracking of attention in the affective disorders: A meta-analytic review and synthesis. Clinical Psychology Review, 32, 704–723. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2012.09.004
3.
BachorowskiJ. A.BraatenE. B. (1994). Emotional intensity: Measurement and theoretical implications. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 191–199. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(94)90025-6
4.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
5.
CanliT.SiversH.WhitfieldS. L.GotlibI. H.GabrieliJ. D. E. (2002). Amygdala response to happy faces as a function of extraversion. Science, 296, 2191. doi:10.1126/science.1068749
6.
CorrP. J.DeYoungC. G.McNaughtonN. (2013). Motivation and personality: A neuropsychological perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 158–175. doi:10.1111/spc3.12016
7.
CostaP. T.JrMcCraeR. R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 21–50. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6401_2
8.
CurranP. J.HussongA. M. (2009). Integrative data analysis: The simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets. Psychological Methods, 14, 81–100. doi:10.1037/a0015914
9.
DecuyperM.De PauwS.De FruytF.De BolleM.De ClercqB. J. (2009). A meta-analysis of psychopathy-, antisocial PD- and FFM associations. European Journal Of Personality, 23, 531–565. doi:10.1002/per.729
10.
De HouwerJ. (2007). A conceptual and theoretical analysis of evaluative conditioning. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10, 230–241. doi:10.1017/S1138741600006491
11.
EysenckH. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
12.
EysenckH. J. (1994). Personality: Biological foundations. In VernonP. A.VernonP. A. (Eds.), The Neuropsychology of Individual Differences (pp. 151–207). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
13.
EysenckH. J.EysenckM. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. Boston, MA: Springer US.
14.
FazioR. H.JacksonJ. R.DuntonB. C.WilliamsC. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013–1027. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1013
15.
FiedlerK.UnkelbachC. (2011). Evaluative conditioning depends on higher order encoding processes. Cognition & Emotion, 25, 639–656. doi:10.1080/02699931.2010.513497
16.
FranksC. M. (1956). Conditioning and personality: A study of normal and neurotic subjects. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 143–150. doi:10.1037/h0047250
17.
FredriksonM.GeorgiadesA. (1992). Personality dimensions and classical conditioning of autonomic nervous system reactions. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 1013–1020. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(92)90134-B
18.
GastA.GawronskiB.De HouwerJ. (2012). Evaluative conditioning: Recent developments and future directions. Learning and Motivation, 43, 79–88. doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2012.06.004
19.
GastA.RothermundK. (2011). What you see is what will change: Evaluative conditioning effects depend on a focus on valence. Cognition & Emotion, 25, 89–110. doi:10.1080/02699931003696380
20.
GebauerJ. E.BleidornW.GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.LambM. E.PotterJ. (2014). Cross-cultural variations in big five relationships with religiosity: A sociocultural motives perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 1064–1091. doi:10.1037/a0037683
21.
GebauerJ. E.SedikidesC.SchönbrodtF. D.BleidornW.RentfrowP. J.PotterJ.GoslingS. D. (2017). The religiosity as social value hypothesis: A multi-method replication and extension across 65 countries and three levels of spatial aggregation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, e18–e39. doi:10.1037/pspp0000104
22.
GrayJ. A. (1981). A critique of Eysenck’s Theory of Personality. In EysenckH. J. (Ed.), A model for personality (pp. 246–276). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-67783-0_8
23.
GrayJ. A. (1991). The psychology of fear and stress. Problems in the behavioural sciences (Vol. 5) Cambridge, New York, Port Chester: Cambridge University Press.
24.
GuptaS.ShuklaA. P. (1989). Verbal operant conditioning as a function of extraversion and reinforcement. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 39–44. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1989.tb02302.x
25.
HoffH.BeneventiH.GaltaK.WikG. (2009). Evidence of deviant emotional processing in psychopathy: A fMRI case study. International Journal of Neuroscience, 119, 857–878. doi:10.1080/00207450701590992
26.
HofmannW.HouwerJ.PeruginiMBaeyensF.CrombezG. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 390–421. doi:10.1037/a0018916
27.
HütterM.De HouwerJ. (2017). Examining the contributions of memory-dependent and memory-independent components to evaluative conditioning via instructions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 71, 49–58.
28.
HütterM.SweldensS.StahlC.UnkelbachC.KlauerK. C. (2012). Dissociating contingency awareness and conditioned attitudes: Evidence of contingency-unaware evaluative conditioning. Journal of experimental psychology. General, 141, 539–557. doi:10.1037/a0026477
29.
JohnO. P.DonahueE. M.KentleR. L. (1998). The Big Five Inventory: Studies of reliability and validity. Berkeley: University of California, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
30.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
31.
KiehlK. A.SmithA. M.HareR. D.MendrekA.ForsterB. B.BrinkJ.LiddleP. F. (2001). Limbic abnormalities in affective processing by criminal psychopaths as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Biological Psychiatry, 50, 677–684. doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(01)01222-7
32.
LandwehrJ. R.GollaB.ReberR. (2017). Processing fluency: An inevitable side effect of evaluative conditioning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 124–128. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.004
33.
LangF. R.LüdtkeO.AsendorpfJ. B. (2001). Testgüte und psychometrische Äquivalenz der deutschen Version des Big Five Inventory (BFI) bei jungen, mittelalten und altenErwachsenen [Validity and psychometric equivalence of the German version of the Big Five Inventory in young, middle-aged and old adults]. Diagnostica, 47(3), 111–121. doi:10.1026//0012-1924.47.3.111
34.
LangP. J.BradleyM. M.CuthbertB. N. (2005). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and in- struction manual (Tech. Rep. A-6). Gainesville: University of Florida.
35.
LarsenR. J.DienerE. (1987). Affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic: A review. Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 1–39. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(87)90023-7
36.
LeinerD. J. (2014). SoSci Survey(Version 2.5.00-i) [Computer software]. Retrieved fromhttps://www.soscisurvey.de
37.
LeveyA. B.MartinI. (1981). Personality and conditioning. In EysenckH. J. (Ed.), A model for personality (pp. 123–168). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-67783-0_5
38.
LissekS.PowersA. S.McClureE. B.PhelpsE. A.WoldehawariatG.GrillonC.PineD. S. (2005). Classical fear conditioning in the anxiety disorders: A meta-analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 1391–1424. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2004.10.007
39.
LucasR. E.BairdB. M. (2004). Extraversion and emotional reactivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 473–485. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.3.473
40.
LucasR. E.DienerE.GrobA.SuhE. M.ShaoL. (2000). Cross-cultural evidence for the fundamental features of extraversion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 452–468. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.3.452
41.
MaasC. J. M.HoxJ. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1, 86–92. doi:10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86
42.
MatthewsG.GillilandK. (1999). The personality theories of H.J. Eysenck and J.A. Gray: A comparative review. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 583–626. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00158-5
43.
MichelaJ. L. (1990). Within-person correlational design and analysis. In ClarkC. H. M. S. (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology, Vol. 11. Research methods in personality and social psychology (pp. 279–311). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
PaulhusD. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598–609. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598
45.
PavlovI. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
46.
PinelesS. L.VogtD. S.OrrS. P. (2009). Personality and fear responses during conditioning: Beyond extraversion. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 48–53. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.003
47.
SchönbrodtF. D.PeruginiM. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize?Journal Of Research In Personality, 47, 609–612. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009
48.
SnijdersT. A. B.BoskerR. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
49.
SotoC. J.JohnO. P. (2009). Ten facet scales for the Big Five Inventory: Convergence with NEO PI-R facets, self-peer agreement, and discriminant validity. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 84–90. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.10.002
50.
SpenceK. W.SpenceJ. T. (1964). Relation of eyelid conditioning to manifest anxiety, extraversion, and rigidity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 144–149. doi:10.1037/h0044881.
51.
SpenceK. W.TaylorJ. A. (1953). The relation of conditioned response strength to anxiety in normal, neurotic, and psychotic subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 265–272. doi:10.1037/h0056392
52.
SteadR.FekkenG. C. (2014). Agreeableness at the core of the dark triad of personality. Individual Differences Research, 12, 131–141.
53.
TaylorJ. A. (1951). The relationship of anxiety to the conditioned eyelid response. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 81–92. doi:10.1037/h0059488
54.
WaltherE. (2002). Guilty by mere association: Evaluative conditioning and the spreading attitude effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 919–934. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.919
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
