Decades ago, social psychologists documented a juror decision-making bias called the race–crime congruency effect: a tendency to condemn Black men more than White men for stereotypically Black crimes but to do the reverse for stereotypically White crimes. We conducted two high-powered experiments (N = 2,520) to see whether this pattern replicates and to examine whether it is attenuated when the defendant is gay. When participants reported on what the average American juror would do (Experiment 1), we observed greater harshness toward Black defendants accused of stereotypically Black crimes but not the previously documented reversal for stereotypically White crimes. Defendant sexual orientation did not moderate this pattern. When participants reported their own judgments about the same criminal cases (Experiment 2), they expressed greater harshness toward White (vs. Black) defendants and toward heterosexual (vs. gay) defendants. These effects were not moderated by crime type. Implications for the race–crime congruency effect are discussed.
AxtJ. R.EbersoleC. R.NosekB. A. (2016). An unintentional, robust, and replicable pro-black bias in social judgment. Social Cognition, 34, 1–39.
2.
BeckettN. E.ParkB. (1995). Use of category versus individuating information: Making base rates salient. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 21–31.
3.
BlashillA. J.PowlishtaK. K. (2009). Gay stereotypes: The use of sexual orientation as a cue for gender-related attributes. Sex Roles, 61, 783–793.
4.
BodenhausenG. V. (1990). Second-guessing the jury: Stereotypic and hindsight biases in perceptions of court cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 1112–1121.
5.
BodenhausenG. V.WyerR. S.Jr. (1985). Effects of stereotypes on decision making and information-processing strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 267–282.
6.
CalabreseS. K.EarnshawV. A.MagnusM.HansenN. B.KrakowerD. S.UnderhillK.…DovidioJ. F. (2017). Sexual stereotypes ascribed to Black men who have sex with men: An intersectional analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0911-3
7.
CohenJ. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press.
8.
ColeE. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64, 170–180.
9.
CoxW. T. L.DevineP. G. (2015). Stereotypes possess heterogeneous directionality: a theoretical and empirical exploration of stereotype structure and content. PLoS One, 10, e0122292.
10.
CraigM. A.RichesonJ. A. (2014). More diverse yet less tolerant? How the increasingly diverse racial landscape affects White Americans’ racial attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 750–761.
11.
DevineP. G.ElliotA. J. (1995). Are racial stereotypes reallyfading? The Princeton trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1139–1150.
12.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (1986). Prejudice, discrimination, and racism: Historical trends and contemporary approaches. In DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 1–34). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
13.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (2000). Aversive racism and selection decisions: 1989 and 1999. Psychological Science, 11, 315–319.
14.
EberhardtJ. L.DaviesP. G.Purdie-VaughnsV. J.JohnsonS. L. (2006). Looking deathworthy: Perceived stereotypicality of Black defendants predicts capital-sentencing outcomes. Psychological Science, 17, 383–386.
15.
Else-QuestN. M.HydeJ. S. (2016). Intersectionality in quantitative psychological research: I. Theoretical and epistemological issues. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40, 155–170.
16.
GalinskyA. D.HallE. V.CuddyA. J. C. (2013). Gendered races: Implications for interracial marriage, leadership selection, and athletic participation. Psychological Science, 24, 498–506.
17.
GhavamiN.PeplauL. A. (2012). An intersectional analysis of gender and ethnic stereotypes: Testing three hypotheses. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 113–127.
18.
GilliamF. D.Jr.IyengarS. (2000). Prime suspects: The influence of local television news on the viewing public. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 560–573.
19.
GordonR. A.BindrimT. A.McNicholasM. L.WaldenT. L. (1988). Perceptions of blue-collar and white-collar crime: The effect of defendant race on simulated juror decisions. The Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 191–197.
20.
ItoT. A.UrlandG. R. (2003). Race and gender on the brain: Electrocortical measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 616–626.
21.
JohnsonK. L.FreemanJ. B.PaukerK. (2012). Race is gendered: How covarying phenotypes and stereotypes bias sex categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 116–131.
22.
JonesC. S.KaplanM. F. (2003). The effects of racially stereotypical crimes on juror decision-making and information-processing strategies. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1–13.
23.
KangS. K.BodenhausenG. V. (2015). Multiple identities in social perception and interaction: Challenges and opportunities. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 547–574.
24.
KasofJ. (1993). Sex bias in the naming of stimulus persons. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 140–163.
25.
KiteM. E.DeauxK. (1987). Gender belief systems: Homosexuality and the implicit inversion theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 83–96.
26.
KruegerJ.ClementR. W. (1994). The truly false consensus effect: An ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 596–610.
27.
KruschkeJ. K.LiddellT. M. (2017). The Bayesian new statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a Bayesian perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1221-4
28.
LakensD. (2017). Equivalence tests: A practical primer for t-tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 355–362.
29.
MaddoxK. B. (2004). Perspectives on racial phenotypicality bias. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 383–401.
30.
MearsD. P.CochranJ. C.LindseyA. M. (2016). Offending and racial and ethnic disparities in criminal justice: A conceptual framework for guiding theory and research informing policy. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 32, 78–103.
31.
MitchellT. L.HawR. M.PfeiferJ. E.MeissnerC. A. (2005). Racial bias in mock juror decision making: A meta-analytic review of defendant treatment. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 621–637.
32.
OosterhofN. N.TodorovA. (2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 105, 11087–11092.
33.
PasekJ.StarkT. H.KrosnickJ. A.TompsonT.PayneB. K. (2014). Attitudes toward Blacks in the Obama era: Changing distributions and impacts on job approval and electoral choice, 2008–2012. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78, 276–302.
34.
PedullaD. S. (2014). The positive consequences of negative stereotypes: Race, sexual orientation, and the job application process. Social Psychology Quarterly, 77, 75–94.
35.
PettigrewT. F. (2017). Social psychological perspectives on Trump supporters. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5, 107–116.
36.
PlantE. A.DevineP. G. (2001). Responses to other-imposed pro-Black pressure: Acceptance or backlash?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 486–501.
37.
Purdie-VaughnsV.EibachR. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59, 337–391.
38.
SchumanH.SteehC.BoboLKrysanM. (1997). Racial attitudes in America: Trends and interpretations(Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
SigallH.PageR. (1971). Current stereotypes: A little fading, a little faking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 247–255.
40.
StrohmingerN.GrayK.ChitucV.HeffnerJ.ScheinC.HeaginsT. B. (2016). The MR2: A multi-racial mega-resolution database of facial stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 1197–1204.
41.
TodorovA.OlivolaC. Y.DotschR.Mende-SiedleckiP. (2015). Social attributions from faces: Determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 519–545.
42.
WesternB. (2006). Punishment and inequality in America. New York, NY: Russell Sage.
43.
WilsonJ. P.RemediosJ. D.RuleN. O. (2017). Interactive effects of obvious and ambiguous social categories on perceptions of leadership: When double-minority status may be beneficial. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 888–900.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
