How do stressful life events impact well-being, and how does their impact differ from person to person? In contrast to work focusing on discrete classes of responding, the current study examines the adequacy of a model where responses to stressors are characterized by a population average and continuous variability around that average. Using decades of yearly data from a large German longitudinal study examining effects of divorce, spousal loss, and unemployment, we found that (1) in the overall population, life satisfaction was diminished for years preceding stressors and only incompletely recovered with the passage of time, and (2) there were large between-person differences around the average response, following normal and heavier-tailed continuous distributions rather than discrete classes. These findings provide a multilevel model of responses to stressors and suggest that individual differences can be understood in terms of continuous variation around what is typical for a given event and population.
AnusicI.YapS. C.LucasR. E. (2014). Testing set-point theory in a Swiss national sample: Reaction and adaptation to major life events. Social Indicators Research, 119, 1265–1288.
2.
BolgerN.LaurenceauJ. P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York, NY: Guilford.
3.
BonannoG. A.WestphalM.ManciniA. D. (2011). Resilience to loss and potential trauma. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 7, 511–535.
4.
BurkeC. T.ShroutP. E.BolgerN. (2007). Individual differences in adjustment to spousal loss: A nonlinear mixed model analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 405–415.
5.
CarnelleyK. B.WortmanC. B.BolgerN.BurkeC. T. (2006). The time course of grief reactions to spousal loss: Evidence from a national probability sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 476–492.
6.
ChangL. J.ReddanM.AsharY. K.EisenbarthH.WagerT. D. (2015). The challenges of forecasting resilience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, 26–27.
7.
CheungF.LucasR. E. (2014). Assessing the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures: Results from three large samples. Quality of Life Research, 23, 2809–2818.
8.
ClarkA. E.DienerE.GeorgellisY.LucasR. E. (2008). Lags and leads in life satisfaction: A test of the baseline hypothesis. The Economic Journal, 118, F222–F243.
9.
FrederickS.LoewensteinG. (1999). Hedonic adaptation. In KahnemanD.DienerE.SchwarzN. (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 302–329). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
10.
FujitaF.DienerE. (2005). Life satisfaction set-point: Stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 158–164.
11.
Galatzer-LevyI. R.BonannoG. A. (2016). It’s not so easy to make resilience go away: Commentary on Infurna and Luthar (2016). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 1951–1998.
12.
Galatzer-LevyI. R.BonannoG. A.ManciniA. D. (2010). From marianthal to latent growth mixture modeling: A return to the exploration of individual differences in response to unemployment. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 3, 116–125.
13.
GelmanA.HillJ. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
14.
GhideyW.LesaffreE.VerbekeG. (2010). A comparison of methods for estimating the random effects distribution of a linear mixed model. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 19, 575–600.
15.
HartiganJ. A.HartiganP. M. (1985). The dip test of unimodality. The Annals of Statistics, 13, 70–84.
16.
InfurnaF. J.LutharS. S. (2016). Resilience to major life stressors is not as common as thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 175–194.
17.
InfurnaF. J.LutharS. S. (2017). The multidimensional nature of resilience to spousal loss. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 926.
18.
InfurnaF. J.WiestM.GerstorfD.RamN.SchuppJ.WagnerG. G.HeckhausenJ. (2017). Changes in life satisfaction when losing one’s spouse: Individual differences in anticipation, reaction, adaptation, and longevity in the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP). Ageing and Society, 37, 899–934.
19.
LangeN.RyanL. (1989). Assessing normality in random effects models. The Annals of Statistics, 17, 624–642.
20.
LucasR. E. (2005). Time does not heal all wounds: A longitudinal study of reaction and adaptation to divorce. Psychological Science, 16, 945–950.
21.
LucasR. E. (2007). Adaptation and the set-point model of subjective well-being does happiness change after major life events. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 75–79.
22.
LucasR. E.ClarkA. E.GeorgellisY.DienerE. (2003). Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: Reactions to changes in marital status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 527–539.
23.
LucasR. E.ClarkA. E.GeorgellisY.DienerE. (2004). Unemployment alters the set point for life satisfaction. Psychological science, 15, 8–13.
24.
LucasR. E.DonnellanM. B. (2012). Estimating the reliability of single-item life satisfaction measures: Results from four national panel studies. Social Indicators Research, 105, 323–331.
25.
LuhmannM.HofmannW.EidM.LucasR. E. (2012). Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 592–615.
26.
LutharS. S.CicchettiD.BeckerB. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71, 543–562.
27.
LykkenD.TellegenA. (1996). Happiness is a stochastic phenomenon. Psychological Science, 7, 186–189.
28.
ManciniA. D.BonannoG. A.ClarkA. E. (2011). Stepping off the hedonic treadmill. Journal of Individual Differences, 32, 144–152.
29.
McCullochC. E.NeuhausJ. M. (2011). Prediction of random effects in linear and generalized linear models under model misspecification. Biometrics, 67, 270–279.
30.
MuthénB. (2004). Latent variable analysis. The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 345–368). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
PinheiroJ. C.BatesD. M. (2000). Linear mixed effects models. Mixed effects models in S and S-Plus. New York: Springer Verlag.
32.
RamN.GrimmK. J. (2009). Methods and measures: Growth mixture modeling: A method for identifying differences in longitudinal change among unobserved groups. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33, 565–576.
33.
RussoS. J.MurroughJ. W.HanM. H.CharneyD. S.NestlerE. J. (2012). Neurobiology of resilience. Nature Neuroscience, 15, 1475–1484.
34.
VerbekeG.MolenberghsG. (2013). The gradient function as an exploratory goodness-of-fit assessment of the random-effects distribution in mixed models. Biostatistics, 14, 477–490.
35.
WagnerG. G.FrickJ. R.SchuppJ. (2007). Enhancing the power of household panel studies: The case of the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP). Schmollers Jahrbuch, 127, 139–169.
36.
WoodS. N. (2006) Generalized additive models: An introduction with R. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall–CRC.
37.
WoodS. N.GoudeY.ShawS. (2015). Generalized additive models for large data sets. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 64, 139–155.
38.
YapS. C.AnusicI.LucasR. E. (2012). Does personality moderate reaction and adaptation to major life events? Evidence from the British Household Panel Survey. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 477–488.
39.
ZuurA. F.SavelievA. A.IenoE. N. (2014). A beginner’s guide to generalized additive mixed models with R. Newburgh, England: Highland Statistics.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
