Past studies have found that multicultural approaches to diversity can reduce prejudice and stimulate positive intergroup relations. The current research explored a possible negative side effect of multiculturalism: whether organizational diversity structures geared toward multiculturalism can conceal racial discrimination and delegitimize racial discrimination claims. Three studies found that, even when objective information was indicative of discrimination, both Whites and racial minorities perceived organizations which had diversity policies emphasizing multiculturalism as more fair toward minorities. This perception of (false) fairness led individuals to perceive less racial discrimination and to view claims of racial discrimination against that organization as less legitimate. Furthermore, we found that organizational multiculturalism and externally granted diversity awards both produced a (false) fairness effect. The results suggest an irony of multicultural diversity structures: They can create a false fairness effect that conceals and delegitimizes discrimination.
ApfelbaumE. P.PaukerK.SommersS. R.AmbadyN. (2010). In blind pursuit of racial equality?Psychological Science, 21, 1587–1592.
2.
ApfelbaumE. P.StephensN. M.ReagansR.E. (2016). Beyond one-size-fits-all: Tailoring diversity approaches to social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 547–566.
3.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2006). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
4.
BradyL. M.KaiserC. R.MajorB.KirbyT. A. (2015). It’s fair for us: Diversity structures cause women to legitimize discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 57, 100–110.
5.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.
6.
BurkardA. W.KnoxS. (2004). Effect of therapist color-blindness on attributions and empathy in cross-cultural counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 387–397.
7.
DoverT. L.MajorB.KaiserC. R. (2014). Diversity initiatives, status, and system-justifying beliefs: When and how diversity efforts de-legitimize discrimination claims. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17, 485–493.
8.
DovidioJ. F.SaguyT.GaertnerS. L. (2010). Appreciating the role of the “individual mind” in diversity science: Commonality, harmony, and change. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 108–114.
9.
EdelmanL. B.KriegerL. H.EliasonS. R.AlbistonC. R.MellemaV. (2011). When organizations rule: Judicial deference to institutionalized employment structures. American Journal of Sociology, 117, 888–954.
10.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
11.
GalinskyA. D.ToddA. R.HomanA. C.PhillipsK. W.ApfelbaumE. P.SasakiS. J.…MadduxW. W. (2015). Maximizing the gains and minimizing the pains of diversity. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 742–748.
12.
GündemirS.DovidioJ. F.HomanA. C.De DreuC. K. W. (2017). The impact of organizational diversity ideologies on minority employees’ leadership self-perceptions and goals. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 24, 172–188
13.
GutiérrezA. S.UnzuetaM. M. (2010). The effect of interethnic ideologies on the likability of stereotypic vs. counterstereotypic minority targets. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 775–784.
14.
HarrisonD. A.KravitzD. A.MayerD. M.LeslieL. M.Lev-AreyD. (2006). Understanding attitudes toward affirmative action programs in employment: Summary and meta-analysis of 35 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1013–1036.
15.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.
16.
HoggM. A.TerryD. I. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25, 121–140.
17.
HomanA. C.BuengelerC.EckhoffR. A.Van GinkelW. P.VoelpelS. C. (2015). The interplay of diversity training and diversity beliefs on team creativity in nationality diverse teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1456–1467.
18.
JoshiY. (2014) The trouble with inclusion. Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law, 21, 207–265.
19.
KaiserC. R.MajorB. (2006). A social psychological perspective on perceiving and reporting discrimination. Law and Social Inquiry, 31, 801–830.
20.
KaiserC. R.MajorB.JurcevicI.DoverT. L.BradyL. M.ShapiroJ. R. (2013). Presumed fair: Ironic effects of organizational diversity structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 504–519.
21.
KalevA.DobbinF.KellyE. (2006). Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review, 71, 589–617.
22.
KauffM.AsbrockF.ThörnerS.WagnerU. (2013). Side effects of multiculturalism: The interaction effect of a multi-cultural ideology and authoritarianism on prejudice and diversity beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 305–320.
23.
KellyE.DobbinF. (1998). How affirmative action became diversity management: Employer response to antidiscrimination law 1961 to 1996. American Behavioral Scientist, 41, 960–984.
KouchakiM. (2011). Vicarious moral licensing: The influence of others’ past moral actions on moral behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 702–715.
26.
KrantzJ. H.DalalR. (2000). Validity of web-based psychological research. In BirnbaumM. H. (Ed.), Psychological experiments on the internet (pp. 35–60). New York, NY: Academic Press.
27.
LeslieL. M.MayerD. M.KravitzD. A. (2014). The stigma of affirmative action: A stereotyping-based theory and meta-analytic test of the consequences for performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 964–989.
28.
MoninB.MillerD. T. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 33–43.
29.
OppenheimerD. M.MeyvisT.DavidenkoN. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867–872.
30.
PaolacciG.ChandlerJ.IpeirotisP. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411–419.
31.
PlautV. C.GarnettF. G.BuffardiL. E.Sanchez-BurksJ. (2011). “What about me?” Perceptions 18 of exclusion and Whites’ reactions to multiculturalism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 337–353.
32.
PlautV. C.ThomasK. M.GorenM. J. (2009). Is multiculturalism or colorblindness better for minorities?Psychological Science, 20, 444–446.
33.
Purdie-VaughnsV.SteeleC. M.DaviesP. G.DitlmannR.CrosbyJ. R. (2008). Social identity contingencies: How diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 615–630.
34.
RattanA.AmbadyN. (2013). Diversity ideologies and intergroup relations: An examination of colorblindness and multiculturalism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 12–21.
35.
RichesonJ. A.NussbaumR. J. (2004). The impact of multiculturalism versus color-blindness on racial bias. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 417–423.
36.
SlaterS. F.WeigandR. A.ZwirleinT. J. (2008). The business case for commitment to diversity. Business Horizons, 51, 201–209.
37.
StevensF. G.PlautV. C.Sanchez-BurksJ. (2008). Unlocking the benefits of diversity: All-inclusive multiculturalism and positive organizational change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44, 116–133.
38.
ToddA. R.GalinskyA. D. (2012). The reciprocal link between multiculturalism and perspective-taking: How ideological and self-regulatory approaches to managing diversity reinforce each other. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1394–1398.
39.
TylerT. R.BladerS. (2003). Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349–361.
40.
TylerT. R.LindA. E. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 115–191). New York, NY: Academic Press.
41.
VerkuytenM. (2005). Ethnic group identification and group evaluation among minority and majority groups: Testing the multiculturalism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 121–138.
42.
VorauerJ. D.GagnonA., & SasakiS. J. (2009). Salient intergroup ideology and intergroup interaction. Psychological Science, 20, 838–845.
43.
VorauerJ. D.SasakiS. J. (2011). In the worst rather than the best of times: Effects of salient intergroup ideology in threatening intergroup interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 307–320.
44.
WolskoC.ParkB.JuddC. M.WittenbrinkB. (2000). Framing interethnic ideology: Effects of multicultural and color-blind perspectives on judgments of groups and individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 635–654.
45.
YogeeswaranK.DasguptaN. (2014). The devil is in the details: Abstract versus concrete construals of multiculturalism differentially impact intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 772–789.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
