Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

What are the spontaneous stereotypes that U.S. citizens hold about the U.S. states? We complemented insights from theory-driven approaches to this question with insights from a novel data-driven approach. Based on pile sorting and spatial arrangement similarity ratings for the states, we computed two cognitive maps of the states. Based on ratings for the states on ∼20 candidate dimensions, we interpreted the dimensions that spanned the two maps (Studies 1 and 2). Consistent with the agency/socioeconomic success, conservative-progressive beliefs, and communion (ABC) model of spontaneous stereotypes, these dimensions that participants spontaneously used to rate the states’ similarity included prosperity (A) and ideology (B) stereotypes (states seen as more liberal and atheist were seen as more educated and wealthy). Study 3 showed that states seen as more average on A and B were stereotyped as more likable. Additionally, Study 3 showed that interstate similarity in stereotypic ideology and prosperity mattered, as it predicted interstate prejudice.

Keywords

spontaneous stereotypes U.S. states ideology prosperity ABC model

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abele

A. E.

Wojciszke

(2014). Communal and agentic content in social cognition: A dual perspective model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 195–255.

Alves

Koch

Unkelbach

(2016). My friends are all alike—The relation between liking and perceived similarity in person perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 62, 103–117.

Alves

Koch

Unkelbach

(2017a). The “common good” phenomenon: Why similarities are positive and differences are negative. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146, 512–528.

Alves

Koch

A. S.

Unkelbach

(2017b). Why good is more alike than bad: Processing implications. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21, 72–82.

Alves

Unkelbach

Burghardt

Koch

A. S.

Krüger

Becker

V. D.

(2015). A density explanation of valence asymmetries in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 43, 896–909.

Chang

J. J.

Carroll

J. D.

(1969). How to use PROFIT, a computer program for property fitting by optimizing nonlinear or linear correlation. Murray Hill, NJ: Bell Telephone Laboratories.

Cuddy

A. J.

Fiske

S. T.

Kwan

V. S.

Glick

Demoulin

Leyens

J. P.

… Ziegler

(2009). Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 1–33.

Fiske

S. T.

Cuddy

A. J.

Glick

(2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.

Fiske

S. T.

Neuberg

S. L.

(1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1–74.

10.

Goldstone

R. L.

Medin

D. L.

Halberstadt

(1997). Similarity in context. Memory & Cognition, 25, 237–255.

11.

Hout

M. C.

Goldinger

S. D.

(2016). SpAM is convenient, but also satisfying: Reply to Verheyen et al. (2016). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 383–387.

12.

Hout

M. C.

Goldinger

S. D.

Ferguson

R. W.

(2013). The versatility of SpAM: A fast, efficient, spatial method of data collection for multidimensional scaling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 256–281.

13.

Hout

M. C.

Papesh

M. H.

Goldinger

S. D.

(2012). Multidimensional scaling. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews (WIREs): Cognitive Science, 4, 93–103.

14.

Imhoff

Koch

(2017). How orthogonal are the Big Two of social perception? On the curvilinear relation between agency and communion. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 122–137.

15.

Inzlicht

Schmeichel

B. J.

Macrae

C. N.

(2014). Why self-control seems (but may not be) limited. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 127–133.

16.

Jaworska

Chupetlovska-Anastasova

(2009). A review of multidimensional scaling (MDS) and its utility in various psychological domains. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 5, 1–10.

17.

Kervyn

Fiske

S. T.

Malone

(2012). Brands as intentional agents framework: How perceived intentions and ability can map brand perception. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 166–176.

18.

Kervyn

Fiske

S. T.

Yzerbyt

V. Y.

(2013). Integrating the stereotype content model (warmth and competence) and the Osgood semantic differential (evaluation, potency, and activity). European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 673–681.

19.

Koch

Alves

Krüger

Unkelbach

(2016). A general valence asymmetry in similarity: Good is more alike than bad. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 1171–1192.

20.

Koch

Imhoff

Dotsch

Unkelbach

Alves

(2016). The ABC of stereotypes about groups: Agency/socio-economic success, conservative-progressive beliefs, and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 675–709.

21.

Koch

Imhoff

Dotsch

Unkelbach

Alves

(2017). Stereotypes about conservative-progressive beliefs serve as guides to regulate the tradeoff between behavioral exploitation and exploration. Manuscript in preparation.

22.

Kruskal

J. B.

Wish

(1978). Multidimensional scaling (Vol. 11). London, England: Sage.

23.

Lammers

Koch

A. S.

Conway

Brandt

M. J.

(in press). The political domain appears simpler to the politically extreme than to political moderates. Social Psychological and Personality Science.

24.

Magee

J. C.

Galinsky

A. D.

(2008). 8 social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. The Academy of Management Annals, 2, 351–398.

25.

McPherson

Smith-Lovin

Cook

J. M.

(2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.

26.

Shaver

Schwartz

Kirson

O’Connor

(1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1061–1068.

27.

Tolman

E. C.

(1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 55, 189–208.

28.

Unkelbach

Fiedler

Bayer

Stegmüller

Danner

(2008). Why positive information is processed faster: The density hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 36–49.

29.

Young

F. W.

Takane

Lewyckyj

(1978). ALSCAL: A nonmetric multidimensional scaling program with several individual-differences options. Behavior Research Methods, 10, 451–453.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

2.77 MB

Studying the Cognitive Map of the U.S. States

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material