Research indicates that existential threat may motivate in-group members to retaliate against out-group members. Less is known about the impact of alignment with one’s religious or national group on retaliatory activity. We addressed this deficiency in a longitudinal study before, and soon after, the beginning of the 2015 Palestinian Stabbing Intifada—a terror wave that is still ongoing. We assessed the predictive power of Israeli’s “identity fusion” (a visceral, family like bond to a group) to either religion or country. We found that fusion with religion (rather than country) predicted endorsement of retaliatory activity, especially after the intifada began. This pattern persisted even when controlling for rival measures such as religiosity, fundamentalism, and conservatism. Apparently, even in relatively secular Israel, ideological commitments to religion foment retaliatory activity that may precipitate further aggression. Future interventions might therefore address issues pertaining to religious identities, even when the conflict appears political or territorial.
AltemeyerB.HunsbergerB. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 113–133.
2.
AtranS.SheikhH.GómezÁ. (2014). Devoted actors sacrifice for close comrades and sacred cause. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 17702–17703. doi:10.1073/pnas.1420474111
BuhrmesterM. D.FraserW. T.LanmanJ. A.WhitehouseH.SwannW. B.Jr. (2014). When terror hits home: Identity fused Americans who saw Boston bombing victims as “family” provided aid. Self and Identity, 14, 253–270. doi:10.1080/ 15298868.2015.992465
5.
Canetti-NisimD.HalperinE.SharvitK.HobfollS. E. (2009). A new stress-based model of political extremism: Personal exposure to terrorism, psychological distress, and exclusionist political attitudes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53, 363–389. doi:10.1177/0022002709333296
6.
FredmanL. A.BuhrmesterM. D.GómezA.FraserW. T.TalaifarS.BrannonS.SwannW. B.Jr. (2015). Identity fusion, extreme pro-group behavior, and the path to defusion. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9, 468–480. doi:10.1111/spc3.12193
7.
GingesJ.HansenI.NorenzayanA. (2009). Religion and support for suicide attacks. Psychological Science, 20, 224–230.
8.
GómezA.BrooksM.BuhrmesterM.VázquezA.JettenJ.SwannW. B.Jr. (2011). On the nature of identify fusion: Insights into the construct and a new measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 918–933. doi:10.1037/a0022642
9.
HalperinE. (2008). Group-based hatred in intractable conflict in Israel. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52, 713–736.
10.
HalperinE. (2011). Emotional barriers to peace: Emotions and public opinion of Jewish Israelis about the peace process in the Middle East. Peace and Conflict, 17, 22–45.
11.
HalperinE.Canetti-NisimD.Hirsch-HoeflerS. (2009). The central role of group-based hatred as an emotional antecedent of political intolerance: Evidence from Israel. Political Psychology, 30, 93–123.
12.
HalperinE.PoratR.TamirM.GrossJ. J. (2013). Can emotion regulation change political attitudes in intractable conflicts? From the laboratory to the field. Psychological Science, 24, 106–111.
13.
HammackP. L.PileckiA.CaspiN.StraussA. A. (2011). Prevalence and correlates of delegitimization among Jewish Israeli adolescents. Peace and Conflict, 17, 151–178.
14.
HaushoferJ.BiletzkiA.KanwisherN. (2010). Both sides retaliate in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 17927–17932.
15.
HewstoneM.CairnsE.VociA.HambergerJ.NiensU. (2006). Intergroup contact, forgiveness, and experience of “the troubles” in Northern Ireland. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 99–120.
16.
HogeR. (1972). A validated intrinsic religious motivation scale. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 11, 369–376.
17.
KelmanH. C. (1999). The interdependence of Israeli and Palestinian national identities: The role of the other in existential conflicts. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 581–600.
18.
KirkpatrickL. A. (1993). Fundamentalism, Christian orthodoxy, and intrinsic religious orientation as predictors of discriminatory attitudes. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 32, 256–268.
19.
LivingstoneA.HaslamS. A. (2008). The importance of social identity content in a setting of chronic social conflict: Understanding intergroup relations in Northern Ireland. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 1–21
20.
MaozI. (2003). Peace-building with the hawks: Attitude change of Jewish-Israeli hawks and doves following dialogue encounters with Palestinians. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 701–714.
21.
MaozI.EidelsonR. J. (2007). Psychological bases of extreme policy preferences how the personal beliefs of Israeli–Jews predict their support for population transfer in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1476–1497.
22.
MaozI.McCauleyC. (2005). Psychological correlates of support for compromise: A polling study of Jewish–Israeli attitudes toward solutions to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Political Psychology, 26, 791–808.
23.
MaozI.McCauleyC. (2008). Threat, dehumanization, and support for retaliatory aggressive policies in asymmetric conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52, 93–116.
24.
MaozI.McCauleyC. (2011). Explaining support for violating out-group human rights in conflict: Attitudes toward principles of human rights, trust in the out-group, and intergroup contact. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 891.
25.
RoccasS.KlarY.LiviatanI. (2006). The paradox of group-based guilt: Modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group’s moral violations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 698–711.
26.
RosenmannA. (2015). Alignment with globalized Western culture: Between inclusionary values and an exclusionary social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 26–43.
27.
RouhanaN. N.Bar-TalD. (1998). Psychological dynamics of intractable ethnonational conflicts: The Israeli–Palestinian case. American Psychologist, 53, 761.
28.
SagemanM. (2004). Understanding terror networks. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
29.
SalomonG. (2004). A narrative-based view of coexistence education. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 273–287.
30.
Schori-EyalN.HalperinE.Bar-TalD. (2014). Three layers of collective victimhood: Effects of multileveled victimhood on intergroup conflicts in the Israeli–Arab context. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 778–794.
31.
SosisR.RuffleB. J. (2003). Religious ritual and cooperation: Testing for a relationship on Israeli religious and secular Kibbutzim1. Current Anthropology, 44, 713–722.
32.
SwannW. B.JrBuhrmesterM.GómezÁ.JettenJ.BastianB.VázquezA.…ZhangA. (2014). What makes a group worth dying for? Identity fusion fosters perception of familial ties, promoting self-sacrifice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 912–926.
33.
SwannW. B.JrGómezA.BuhrmesterM. D.López-RodríguezL.JiménezJ.VázquezA. (2014). Contemplating the ultimate sacrifice: Identity fusion channels pro-group affect, cognition, and moral decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 713–727.
34.
SwannW. B.JrGómezA.SeyleC.MoralesF.HuiciC. (2009). Identity fusion: The interplay of personal and social identities in extreme group behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 995–1011. doi:10.1037/a0013668
35.
SwannW. B.JrJettenJ.GómezA.WhitehouseH.BastianB. (2012). When group membership gets personal: A theory of identity fusion. Psychological Review, 119, 441–456. doi:10.1037/a0028589
36.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 33, 74.
37.
WhitehouseH.JongJ.BuhrmesterM. D.GomezA.BastianB.KavanaghC. M.…GavriletsS. (2016). The evolution of extreme cooperation via shared dysphoric experiences. Manuscript submitted for publication.
38.
WhitehouseH.McQuinnB.BuhrmesterM. D.SwannW. B.Jr. (2014). Brothers in arms: Libyan revolutionaries bond like family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 17783–17785.
39.
ZavalaD.GolecA.CislakA.WesolowskaE. (2010). Political conservatism, need for cognitive closure, and intergroup hostility. Political Psychology, 31, 521–541.
