Political conservatives have been widely documented to regard out-group members as hostile, perceive individuals of ambiguous intent as malevolent, and favor aggressive solutions to intergroup conflict. A growing literature indicates that potential violent adversaries are represented using the dimensions of envisioned physical size/strength to summarize opponents’ fighting capacities relative to the self or in-group. Integrating these programs, we hypothesized that, compared to liberals, conservatives would envision an ambiguous out-group target as more likely to pose a threat, yet as vanquishable through force, and thus as less formidable. Participants from the United States (Study 1) and Spain (Study 2) assessed Syrian refugees, a group that the public widely suspects includes terrorists. As predicted, in both societies, conservatives envisioned refugees as more likely to be terrorists and as less physically formidable. As hypothesized, this “Gulliver effect” was mediated by confidence in each society’s capacity to thwart terrorism via aggressive military or police measures.
AltemeyerB. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality.” In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47–92). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
2.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.
3.
CararroL.CastelliL.MacchiellaC. (2011). The automatic conservative: Ideology-based attentional asymmetries in the processing of valenced information. PLoS One, 6, e26456.
4.
DoddM. D.BalzerA.JacobsC. M.GruszczynskiM. W.SmithK. B.HibbingJ. R. (2012). The political left rolls with the good and the political right confronts the bad: Connecting physiology and cognition to preferences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 367, 640–649.
5.
DuguidM. M.GoncaloJ. A. (2012). Living large: The powerful overestimate their own height. Psychological Science, 23, 36–40.
6.
FesslerD. M. T.HolbrookC. (2013). Friends shrink foes: The presence of comrades decreases the envisioned physical formidability of an opponent. Psychological Science, 94, 797–802.
7.
FesslerD. M. T.HolbrookC. (2014). Marching into battle: Synchronous walking diminishes the conceptualized formidability of an antagonist in men. Biology Letters, 10. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2014.0592
8.
FesslerD. M. T.HolbrookC. (2016). Synchronized behavior increases assessments of the formidability and cohesion of coalitions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37, 502–509.
9.
FesslerD. M. T.HolbrookC.DashoffD. (2016). Dressed to kill? Visible markers of coalitional affiliation enhance conceptualized formidability. Aggressive Behavior, 42, 299–309.
10.
FesslerD. M. T.HolbrookC.GervaisM. (2014). Men’s physical strength moderates conceptualizations of prospective foes in two disparate human societies. Human Nature, 25, 393–409.
11.
FesslerD. M. T.HolbrookC.SnyderJ. K. (2012). Weapons make the man (larger): Formidability is represented as size and strength in humans. PLoS One, 7, e32751. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032751
12.
FesslerD. M. T.PisorA. C.HolbrookC. (in press). Red state of fear: Conservatism predicts increased credulity regarding putative hazards. Manuscript available upon request.
13.
FesslerD. M. T.PisorA. C.HolbrookC. (under review). Political orientation predicts credulity regarding putative hazards. Manuscript available upon request.
14.
FrederickD. A.PeplauL. A. (2007). The UCLA Body Matrices II: Computer-generated images of men and women varying in body fat and muscularity/breast size to assess body satisfaction and preferences. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Memphis, TN.
HerrmannR. K.TetlockP. E.VisserP. S. (1999). Mass public decisions to go to war: A cognitive-interactionist framework. American Political Science Review, 93, 553–573.
17.
HibbingJ. R.SmithK. B.AlfordJ. R. (2014). Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37, 297–307.
18.
HolbrookC.FesslerD. M. T. (2013). Sizing up the threat: The envisioned physical formidability of terrorists tracks their leaders’ failures and successes. Cognition, 127, 46–56.
19.
HolbrookC.FesslerD. M. T.NavarreteC. (2016). Looming large in others’ eyes: Racial stereotypes illuminate dual adaptations for representing threat versus prestige as physical size. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37, 67–78.
20.
HolbrookC.FesslerD. M. T.PollackJ. (2016). With God on your side: Religious primes reduce the envisioned physical formidability of a menacing adversary. Cognition, 146, 387–392.
21.
IBM Corp. (2013). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 22.0) [Computer software]. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
22.
JohnsonD. D. P.McDermottR.CowdenJ.TingleyD. (2012). Dead certain: Confidence and conservatism predict aggression in simulated international crisis decision-making. Human Nature, 23, 98–126.
JostJ. T.AmodioD. M. (2012). Political ideology as motivated social cognition: Behavioral and neuroscientific evidence. Motivation and Emotion, 36, 55–64.
25.
JostJ. T.GlaserJ.KruglanskiA. W.SullowayF. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.
26.
JostJ. T.NapierJ. L.ThorisdottirH.GoslingS. D.PalfaiT. P.OstafinB. (2007). Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 989–1007.
27.
KanaiR.FeildenT.FirthC.ReesG. (2011). Political orientations are correlated with brain structure in young adults. Current Biology, 21, 677–680.
28.
López-RodríguezL.VázquezA.AtranS.GingesJ.SheikhH.GómezA. (under review). Identity fusion moderates the perception of in-group and out-group formidability.
29.
McLeanS. P.GarzaJ. P.WiebeS. A.DoddM. D.SmithK. B.HibbingJ. R.EspyK. A. (2014). Applying the Flanker task to political psychology: A research note. Political Psychology, 35, 831–840.
30.
OxleyD. R.SmithK. B.AlfordJ. R.HibbingM. V.MillerJ. L.ScaloraM.…HibbingJ. R. (2008). Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science, 321, 1667–1670.
31.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
32.
PyszczynskiT.AbdollahiA.SolomonS.GreenbergJ.CohenF.WeiseD. (2006). Mortality salience, martyrdom, and military might: The great Satan versus the axis of evil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 525–537.
33.
RobinsonJ. P.WrightsmanL. S.AndrewsF. M. (Eds.). (1991). Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
34.
SheikhH.GómezÁ.AtranS. (2016). Empirical evidence for the devoted actor model. Current Anthropology, 57, S000.
35.
VigilJ. M. (2010). Political leanings vary with facial expression processing and psychosocial functioning. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 13, 547–558.
36.
von RuedenC.GurvenM.KaplanH. (2008). The multiple dimensions of male social status in an Amazonian society. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 402–415.
37.
YapA.MasonM. F.AmesD. R. (2013). The powerful size others down: The link between power and estimates of others’ size. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 591–594.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
