Disgust motivates pathogen avoidance, but it is unclear why it is also reported toward moral violations. Previous explanations have focused on identifying the type of violation specific to disgust. Here, we propose that people express disgust toward any type of moral violation in order to communicate particular motives. Unlike anger, which can be seen as self-interested, disgust communicates a more principled, moral motivation. Two experiments show that observers infer more moral motivation from an expression of disgust and more self-interested motivation from anger. Two further experiments testing participants’ own expression decisions demonstrate that disgust is chosen more to show moral concern and anger is chosen to protest harm to one’s self-interest. By shifting focus to the interpersonal effects of emotion expressions, these findings offer a new perspective for understanding the role of disgust in morality.
CannonP. R.SchnallS.WhiteM. (2010). Transgressions and expressions: Affective facial muscle activity predicts moral judgments. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 325–331. doi:10.1177/1948550610390525
2.
ChapmanH. A.AndersonA. K. (2013). Things rank and gross in nature: A review and synthesis of moral disgust. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 300–327. doi:10.1037/a0030964
3.
ChapmanH. A.KimD. A.SusskindJ. M.AndersonA. K. (2009). In bad taste: Evidence for the oral origins of moral disgust. Science, 323, 1222–1226. doi:10.1126/science.1165565
4.
CottonJ. L.O’NeillB. S.GriffinA. (2008). The “name game”: Affective and hiring reactions to first names. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23, 18–39. doi:10.1108/02683940810849648
5.
CurtisV.AungerR.RabieT. (2004). Evidence that disgust evolved to protect from risk of disease. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 271, S131–S133. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2003.0144
6.
DanovitchJ.BloomP. (2009). Children’s extension of disgust to physical and moral events. Emotion, 9, 107–112. doi:10.1037/a0014113
7.
DunnJ. R.SchweitzerM. E. (2005). Feeling and believing: The influence of emotion on trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 736–748. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.736
8.
FischerA. H.MansteadA. S. R. (2008). Social functions of emotion. In LewisM.HavilandJ.Feldman BarrettL. (Eds.), Handbook of emotion (3rd ed., pp. 456–469). New York, NY: Guilford.
9.
FridlundA. J. (1994). Human facial expression: An evolutionary view. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
10.
FrijdaN. H. (1994). Emotions are functional, most of the time. In EkmanP.DavidsonR. J. (Eds.), The nature of emotion: Fundamental questions (pp. 112–126). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
11.
Giner-SorollaR. (2012). Judging passions: Moral emotions in persons and groups. London, England: Psychology Press.
12.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.NosekB. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029–1046. doi:10.1037/a0015141
13.
HareliS.HessU. (2010). What emotional reactions can tell us about the nature of others: An appraisal perspective on person perception. Cognition & Emotion, 24, 128–140. doi:10.1080/02699930802613828
14.
HareliS.HessU. (2012). The social signal value of emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 26, 385–389. doi:10.1080/02699931.2012.665029
15.
HindeR. A. (1985). Was ‘the expression of the emotions’ a misleading phrase?Animal Behaviour, 33, 985–992. doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(85)80032-4
16.
HorbergE. J.OveisC.KeltnerD.CohenA. B. (2009). Disgust and the moralization of purity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 963–976. doi:10.1037/a0017423
17.
HutchersonC. A.GrossJ. J. (2011). The moral emotions: A social-functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 719–737. doi:10.1037/a0022408
18.
InbarY.PizarroD. A. (2014). Pollution and purity in moral and political judgment. In WrightJ.SarkissianH. (Eds.), Advances in experimental moral psychology: Affect, character, and commitments (pp. 111–129). New York: Bloomsbury Academic Continuum Press.
19.
KeltnerD.HaidtJ. (1999). Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognition & Emotion, 13, 505–521. doi:10.1080/026999399379168
20.
KuppensP.Van MechelenI.SmitsD. J.De BoeckP. (2003). The appraisal basis of anger: Specificity, necessity and sufficiency of components. Emotion, 3, 254–269. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.3.3.254
21.
LangnerO.DotschR.BijlstraG.WigboldusD. H.HawkS. T.Van KnippenbergA. (2010). Presentation and validation of the Radboud faces database. Cognition & Emotion, 24, 1377–1388. doi:10.1080/02699930903485076
22.
OatenM.StevensonR. J.CaseT. I. (2009). Disgust as a disease-avoidance mechanism. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 303–321. doi:10.1037/a0014823
23.
ParkinsonB. (2005). Do facial movements express emotions or communicate motives?Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 278–311. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0904_1
24.
PizarroD.InbarY.HelionC. (2011). On disgust and moral judgment. Emotion Review, 3, 267–268. doi:10.1177/1754073911402394
25.
RosemanI. J.WiestC.SwartzT. S. (1994). Phenomenology, behaviors, and goals differentiate discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 206–221. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.67.2.206
26.
RozinP.LoweryL.ImadaS.HaidtJ. (1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 574–586. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.574
27.
RussellP. S.Giner-SorollaR. (2013). Bodily moral disgust: What it is, how it is different from anger, and why it is an unreasoned emotion. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 328–351. doi:10.1037/a0029319
28.
SellA.ToobyJ.CosmidesL. (2009). Formidability and the logic of human anger. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 15073–15078. doi:10.1073/pnas.0904312106
29.
TyburJ. M.LiebermanD.GriskeviciusV. (2009). Microbes, mating, and morality: Individual differences in three functional domains of disgust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 103–122. doi:10.1037/a0015474
30.
TyburJ. M.LiebermanD.KurzbanR.DeScioliP. (2013). Disgust: Evolved function and structure. Psychological Review, 120, 65–84. doi:10.1037/a0030778
31.
Van BeestI. V.van KleefG. A.Van DijkE. V. (2008). Get angry, get out: The interpersonal effects of anger communication in multiparty negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 993–1002. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.02.008
32.
van DoornE. A.van KleefG. A.van der PligtJ. (2015). Deriving meaning from others’ emotions: Attribution, appraisal, and the use of emotions as social information. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01077
33.
van KleefG. A. (2009). How emotions regulate social life: The Emotions as Social Information (EASI) model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 184–188. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01633.x
34.
van KleefG. A.De DreuC. K.MansteadA. S. (2004). The interpersonal effects of anger and happiness in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 57–76. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.57
35.
ZhongC. B.HouseJ. (2014). Dirt, pollution, and purity: A metaphorical perspective on morality. In LandauM. J.RobinsonM.MeierB. (Eds.), Metaphorical thought in social life (pp. 109–131). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
