We examined whether psychological distance from interpersonal transgressions can promote victim forgiveness via high-level construal. Participants responded to conflict vignettes. In Experiment 1, we found a positive effect of temporal distance on forgiveness, mediated by construal level. In Experiment 2, we found a positive effect of physical distance on construal level (2a) and a positive effect of construal level on forgiveness (2b). In Experiment 3, we found that construal level promotes forgiveness via reduced perceptions of transgression severity. Together, our experiments demonstrate that increasing victims’ psychological distance from interpersonal transgressions promotes forgiveness due to high-level construal. Implications for construal level theory and for research on forgiveness are discussed.
AlterA. L.OppenheimerD. M.ZemlaJ. C. (2010). Missing the trees for the forest: Construal level account of the illusion of explanatory depth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 436–451. doi:10.1037/a0020218
2.
AquinoK.TrippT. M.BiesR. J. (2006). Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 653–668. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.653
3.
Bar-AnanY.LibermanN.TropeY.AlgomD. (2007). Automatic processing of psychological distance: Evidence from a stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 610–622. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.610
4.
BerryJ. W.WorthingtonE. L.JrParrottL.O’ConnorL. E.WadeN. G. (2001). Dispositional forgivingness: Development and construct validity of the Transgression Narrative Test of Forgivingness (TNTF). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1277–1290. doi:10.1177/01461672012710004
5.
BoonS. D.SulskyL. M. (1997). Attributions of blame and forgiveness in romantic relationships: A policy-capturing study. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 19–44.
6.
CheungI.OlsonJ. M. (2013). Sometimes it’s easier to forgive my transgressor than your transgressor: Effects of subjective temporal distance on forgiveness for harm to self or close other. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 195–200. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00997.x
7.
CoughlinA. (2015). Rumination, time, and forgiveness: Are changes in thinking over time associated with the development of forgiveness (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia.
8.
DarwentK. M.FujitaK.WakslakC. J. (2010). On the role of abstraction in global and local processing phenomena. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 198–202. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2010.502094
9.
EatonJ.StruthersC. W.SantelliA. G. (2006). Dispositional and state forgiveness: The role of self-esteem, need for structure, and narcissism. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 371–380. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.02.005
10.
EnrightR. D., & the Human Development Study Group. (1994). Piaget on the moral development of forgiveness: Identity or reciprocity?Human Development, 37, 63–80.
11.
EyalT.LibermanN. (2012). Morality and psychological distance: A construal level theory perspective. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil. Herzliya series on personality and social psychology (pp. 185–202). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
12.
EyalT.LibermanN.TropeY. (2008). Judging near and distant virtue and vice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1204–1209. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.012
13.
FehrR.GelfandM. J.NagM. (2010). The road to forgiveness: A meta-analytic synthesis of its situational and dispositional correlates. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 894–914. doi:10.1037/a0019993
14.
FreitasA. L.GollwitzerP. M.TropeY. (2004). The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding others’ self-regulatory efforts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 739–752. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.04.003
15.
FujitaK.HendersonM. D.MarloneD.EngJ.TropeY.LibermanN. (2006). Spatial distance and mental construal of social events. Psychological Science, 17, 278–282. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01698.x
16.
FujitaK.TropeY.LibermanN.Levin-SagiM. (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 351–367. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.351
17.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
18.
HendersonM. D. (2013). When seeing the forest reduces the need for trees: The role of construal level in attraction to choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 676–683. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.001
19.
JiaL.HirtE. R.KarpenS. C. (2009). Lessons from a Faraway land: The effect of spatial distance on creative cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1127–1131. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.05.015
20.
KarremansJ. C.AartsH. (2007). The role of automaticity in determining the inclination to forgive close others. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 902–917. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.012
21.
KarremansJ. C.SmithP. K. (2010). Having the power to forgive: When the experience of power increases interpersonal forgiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1010–1023. doi:10.1177/0146167210376761
22.
LibermanN.ForsterJ. (2009). Distancing from experienced self: How global-versus-local perception affects estimation of psychological distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 203–216. doi:10.1037/a0015671
23.
LibermanN.TropeY.StephanE. (2007). Psychological distance. In KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (Vol. 2, pp. 353–383). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24.
MageeJ. C.MillikenF. J.LurieA. R. (2010). Power and the construal of a crisis: The immediate aftermath of September 11, 2001. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 354–370. doi:10.1177/0146167209360418
25.
McCulloughM. E. (2001). Forgiveness: Who does it and how do they do it?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 194–197. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00147
26.
McCulloughM. E.FinchamF. D.TsangJ. (2003). Forgiveness, forbearance, and time: The temporal unfolding of transgression-related interpersonal motivations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 540–557. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.540.
27.
McCulloughM. E.HoytW. T. (2002). Transgression-related motivational dispositions: Personality substrates of forgiveness and their links to the Big Five. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1556–1573. doi:10.1177/014616702237583
28.
McCulloughM. E.LunaL. R.BerryJ. W.TabakB. A.BonoG. (2010). On the form and function of forgiving: Modeling the time-forgiveness relationship and testing the valuable relationship hypothesis. Emotion, 10, 358–376. doi:10.1037/a0019349
29.
McCulloughM. E.RachalK. C.SandageS. J.WorthingtonE. L.JrBrownS. W.HightT. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586–1603. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1586
30.
McCulloughM. E.RootL. M.CohenA. D. (2006). Writing about the benefits of an interpersonal transgression facilitates forgiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 887–897. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.74.5.887
31.
McCulloughM. E.SandageS. J.WorthingtonE. L.Jr. (1997). To forgive is human. Downers Grove, IL: Inter Varsity.
32.
McCulloughM. E.WorthingtonE. L.JrRachalK. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321–336. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.321
33.
McNultyJ. K. (2010). Forgiveness increases the likelihood of subsequent partner transgressions in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 787–790. doi:10.1037/a0021678
34.
McNultyJ. K. (2011). The dark side of forgiveness: The tendency to forgive predicts continued psychological and physical aggression in marriage. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 770–783. doi:10.1177/0146167211407077
35.
PronkT. M.KarremansJ. C.OverbeekG.VermulstA. A.WigboldusD. H. J. (2010). What it takes to forgive: When and why executive functioning facilitates forgiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 119–131. doi:10.1037/a0017875
36.
RimS.HansenJ.TropeY. (2013). What happens why? Psychological distance and focusing on causes versus consequences of events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 457–472. doi:10.1037/a0031024
37.
Schmid MastM.JonasK.HallJ. A. (2009). Give a person power and he or she will show interpersonal sensitivity: The phenomenon and its why and when. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 835–850. doi:10.1037/a0016234
38.
SmithP. K.TropeY. (2006). You focus on the forest when you’re in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 578–596. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.578
39.
SoderbergC. K.CallahanS. P.KochersbergerA. O.AmitE.LedgerwoodA. (2015). The effects of psychological distance on abstraction: Two meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 525–548. doi:10.1037/bul0000005
40.
SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P.FongG. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845–851. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845
41.
StruthersC. W.DupuisR.EatonJ. (2005). Promoting forgiveness among co-workers following a workplace transgression: The effects of social motivation training. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 37, 299–308. doi:10.1037/h0087264
TropeY.LibermanN. (2010). Construal level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440–463. doi:10.1037/a0018963
44.
VallacherR. R.WegnerD. M. (1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 660–671. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.660
45.
WohlM. J. A.McGarthA. L. (2007). The perception of time heals all wounds: Temporal distance affects willingness to forgive following an interpersonal transgression. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 33, 1023–1035. doi:10.1177/0146167207301021
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
