Five studies tested the relationship between narcissism and support for hierarchy. Narcissism was associated with endorsing group-based hierarchy, income inequality, and hierarchy in business (Studies 1a–1b) and with liking organizations with a hierarchical structure (Studies 2a–2b). Analyses suggested that more narcissistic participants’ preference for a hierarchy may have been due at least partly to their current high standing in that hierarchy (Studies 1a–1b) or their expectation that they will rise in rank (Studies 2a–2b). When participants learned about an organization where it was possible or impossible to rise in rank, there was a positive relationship between narcissism and support for hierarchy if it was possible to rise in rank, whereas the same relationship was negative if it was not possible to rise in rank (Study 3). These studies provide evidence consistent with the idea that narcissistic individuals prefer hierarchies because they are or think they will be on the top.
AckermanR. A.WittE. A.DonnellanM. B.TrzesniewskiK. H.RobinsR. W.KashyD. A. (2011). What does the Narcissistic Personality Inventory really measure?Assessment, 18, 67–87. doi:10.1177/1073191110382845
2.
AdlerN. E.EpelE. S.CastellazzoG.IckovicsJ. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy White women. Health Psychology, 19, 586–592. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586
3.
AndersonC.KilduffG. J. (2009). Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 491–503. doi:10.1037/a0014201
4.
AndersonC.WillerR.KilduffG. J.BrownC. E. (2012). The origins of deference: When do people prefer lower status?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 1077–1088. doi:10.1037/a0027409
BenderskyC.ShahN. P. (2013). The downfall of extraverts and rise of neurotics: The dynamic process of status allocation in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 387–406. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0316
Bleske-RechekA.RemikerM. W.BakerJ. P. (2008). Narcissistic men and women think they are so hot—But they are not. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 420–424. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.05.018
9.
BloomM. (1999). The performance effects of pay dispersion on individuals and organizations. The Academy of Management Journal, 42, 25–40. doi:10.2307/256872
10.
BrunellA. B.GentryW. A.CampbellW. K.HoffmanB. J.KuhnertK. W.DeMareeK. G. (2008). Leader emergence: The case of the narcissistic leader. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1663–1676. doi:10.1177/0146167208324101
11.
CampbellW. K.FosterJ. D. (2007). The narcissistic self: Background, an extended agency model, and ongoing controversies. In SedikidesC.SpencerS. (Eds.), Frontiers in social psychology: The self (pp. 115–138). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
12.
CampbellW. K.RudichE. A.SedikidesC. (2002). Narcissism, self-esteem, and the positivity of self-views: Two portraits of self-love. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 358–368. doi:10.1177/0146167202286007
13.
CarnahanT.McFarlandS. (2007). Revisiting the Stanford Prison Experiment: Could participant self-selection have led to cruelty?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 603–614. doi:10.1177/0146167206292689
14.
FriesenJ. P.KayA. C.EibachR. P.GalinskyA. D. (2014). Seeking structure in social organization: Compensatory control and the psychological advantages of hierarchy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 590–609. doi:10.1037/a0035620
15.
GabrielM. T.CritelliJ. W.EeJ. S. (1994). Narcissistic illusions in self-evaluations of intelligence and attractiveness. Journal of Personality, 62, 143–155. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00798.x
16.
GoncaloJ. A.FlynnF. J.KimS. H. (2010). Are two narcissists better than one? The link between narcissism, perceived creativity, and creative performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1484–1495. doi:10.1177/0146167210385109
17.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B.Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big Five Personality Domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504–528. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
18.
GrijalvaE.HarmsP. D.NewmanD. A.GaddisB. H.FraleyC. (2015). Narcissism and leadership: A meta-analytic review of linear and nonlinear relationships. Personnel Psychology, 68, 1–47. doi:10.1111/peps.12072
19.
GrijalvaE.NewmanD. A.TayL.DonnellanM. B.HarmsP. D.RobinsR. W.YanT. (2015). Gender differences in narcissism: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 261–310. doi:10.1037/a0038231
20.
HalevyN.ChouE. Y.GalinskyA. D.MurnighanJ. K. (2012). When hierarchy wins: Evidence from the National Basketball Association. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 398–406. doi:10.1177/1948550611424225
21.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and condition process analysis: A regression based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
22.
HodsonG.HoggS. M.MacInnisC. C. (2009). The role of “dark personalities” (narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy), Big Five personality factors, and ideology in explaining prejudice. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 686–690. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.005
23.
Jaime-CastilloA. M. (2008, 6). Expectations of social mobility, meritocracy, and demand for redistribution in Spain. Paper presented at the Inequality Beyond Globalization Conference, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
24.
JohnO. P.RobinsR. W. (1994). Accuracy and bias in self-perception: Individual differences in self-enhancement and the role of narcissism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 206–219. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.206
25.
JostJ. T.HunyadyO. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 111–153. doi:10.1080/10463280240000046
26.
JostJ. T.ThompsonE. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209–232. doi:10.1006/jesp.1999.1403
27.
LeeI. C.PrattoF.JohnsonB. T. (2011). Intergroup consensus/disagreement in support of group-based hierarchy: An examination of socio-structural and psycho-cultural factors. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 1029–1064. doi:10.1037/a0025410
28.
MageeJ. C.GalinskyA. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 351–398. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1298493
29.
NevickaB.De HooghA. H. B.Van VianenA. E. M.BeersmaB.McIlwainD. (2011). All I need is a stage to shine: Narcissists’ leader emergence and performance. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 910–925. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.011
30.
PaulhusD. L.WilliamsK. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563. doi:10.1016/ S0092-6566(02)00505-6
31.
PiffP. K. (2014). Wealth and the inflated self: Class, entitlement, and narcissism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 34–43. doi:10.1177/0146167213501699
32.
PrattoF.SidaniuisJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
33.
RaskinR.TerryH. (1988). A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and some further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890–902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.890
34.
RosenthalS. A.PittinskyT. L. (2006). Narcissistic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 617–633. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.005
35.
SchwartzS. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19–45. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x
36.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
37.
SpurkD.KellerA. C.HirschiA. (2015). Do bad guys get ahead or fall behind? Relationships of the dark triad of personality with objective and subjective career success. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 113–121. doi:10.1177/1948550615609735
38.
Van BerkelL.CrandallC. S.EidelmanS.BlancharJ. (2015). Hierarchy, dominance and deliberation: Egalitarian values require mental effort. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1207–1222. doi:10.1177/0146167215591961
39.
WilleB.De FruytF.De ClercqB. (2013). Expanding and reconceptualizing aberrant personality at work: Validity of five-factor model aberrant personality tendencies to predict career outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 66, 173–223. doi:10.1111/peps.12016
40.
Zeigler-HillV.WallaceM. T. (2011). Racial differences in narcissistic tendencies. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 456–467. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2011.06.001
41.
ZitekE. M.TiedensL. Z. (2012). The fluency of social hierarchy: The ease with which hierarchical relationships are seen, remembered, learned, and liked. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 98–115. doi:10.1037/a0025345
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
