Is there a dark side to organic food? Eskine reported that participants exposed to organic food became much more morally judgmental and much less prosocial relative to participants exposed to neutral or comfort foods. This research sparked tremendous media interest, but was based on one experiment with a small sample size. We report three attempts to replicate Eskine using samples conferring high power, preregistered analysis plans, and original materials. Across two direct replications and an online conceptual replication, we found that organic food exposure has little to no effect on moral judgments (d = 0.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] [−0.14, 0.26], N = 377) and prosocial behavior (d = 0.03, 95% CI [−0.17, 0.23], N = 377). Mere exposure to organic food is probably not sufficient to substantially change moral behavior.
AertsensJ.MondelaersK.VerbekeW.BuysseJ.Van HuylenbroeckG. (2011). The influence of subjective and objective knowledge on attitude, motivations and consumption of organic food. British Food Journal, 113, 1353–1378. doi:10.1108/00070701111179988
2.
BlankenI.van de VenN.ZeelenbergM. (2015). A meta-analytic review of moral licensing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. doi:10.1177/0146167215572134
3.
BrandtM. J.IJzermanH.DijksterhuisA.FarachF. J.GellerJ.Giner-SorollaR.…van ‘t VeerA. (2014). The replication recipe: What makes for a convincing replication?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 217–224. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005
CummingG. (2011). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
6.
CusackM.VezenkovaN.GottschalkC.Calin-JagemanR. J. (2015). Direct and Conceptual Replications of Burgmer & Englich (2012): Power may have little to no effect on motor performance. PLOS ONE, 10, e0140806. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0140806
7.
DupontW. D.PlummerW. D. (1998). Power and sample size calculations for studies involving linear regression. Controlled Clinical Trials, 19, 589–601. Retrieved fromhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9875838
8.
EskineK. J. (2013). Wholesome foods and wholesome morals?: Organic foods reduce prosocial behavior and harshen moral judgments. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 251–254. doi:10.1177/1948550612447114
HedgesL. V. (1981). Distribution theory for glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 6, 107–128. doi:10.3102/10769986006002107
11.
KleinR. A.RatliffK. A.VianelloM.AdamsR. B.BahníkŠ.BernsteinM. J.…NosekB. A. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “Many Labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142–152. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000178
MazarN.ZhongC.-B. (2010). Do green products make us better people?Psychological Science : A Journal of the American Psychological Society / APS, 21, 494–498. doi:10.1177/0956797610363538
MondelaersK.VerbekeW.Van HuylenbroeckG. (2009). Importance of health and environment as quality traits in the buying decision of organic products. British Food Journal, 111, 1120–1139. doi:10.1108/00070700910992952
16.
MoninB.MillerD. T. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 33–43. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.33
17.
NuijtenM. B.HartgerinkC. H. J.van AssenM. A. L. M.EpskampS.WichertsJ. M. (2015). The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013). Behavior Research Methods. doi:10.3758/s13428-015-0664-2
18.
OppenheimerD. M.MeyvisT.DavidenkoN. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867–872. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009
RandD. G.PeysakhovichA.Kraft-ToddG. T.NewmanG. E.WurzbacherO.NowakM. a.GreeneJ. D. (2014). Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation. Nature Communications, 5, 3677. doi:10.1038/ncomms4677
21.
SahotaA. (2008). The global market for organic food and drink. In WillerH.Yussefi-MenzlerM.SorensenN. (Eds.), The World of organic agriculture: Statistics and emerging trends 2008 (pp. 53–58). New York, NY: Routledge.
22.
SimmonsJ. P.NelsonL. D.SimonsohnU. (2012). A 21 Word solution. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–4. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2160588
23.
SimonsohnU. (2015). Small telescopes: Detectability and the evaluation of replication results. Psychological Science, 26, 559–569. doi:10.1177/0956797614567341
24.
TrueloveH. B.Carricoa. R.WeberE. U.RaimiK. T.VandenberghM. P. (2014). Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and theoretical framework. Global Environmental Change, 29, 127–138. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.004
25.
Van RheeH. J.SuurmondR.HakT. (2015). User manual for meta-essentials: Workbooks for meta-analyses. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Erasmus Research Institute of Management. Retrieved fromwww.erim.eur.nl/research-support/meta-essentials
26.
WheatleyT.HaidtJ. (2005). Hypnotic disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science, 16, 780–784. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01614.x
27.
YoungN. S.IoannidisJ. P. a.Al-UbaydliO. (2008). Why current publication practices may distort science. PLoS Medicine, 5, e201. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050201
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
