What is the extent and nature of religious prosociality? If religious prosociality exists, is it parochial and extended selectively to coreligionists or is it generalized regardless of the recipient? Further, is it driven by preferences to help others or by expectations of reciprocity? We examined how much of a US$0.30 bonus Mechanical Turk workers would share with the other player whose religion was prominently displayed during two online resource allocation games. In one game (but not the other), the recipient could choose to reciprocate. Results from both games showed that the more central religion was in participants’ lives, the more of the bonus they shared, regardless of whether they were giving to atheists or Christians. Furthermore, this effect was most clearly related to self-reported frequency of “thinking about religious ideas” rather than belief in God or religious practice/experience. Our findings provide evidence of generalized religious prosociality and illuminate its basis.
AhmedA. M. (2009). Are religious people more prosocial? A quasi-experimental study with Madrasah pupils in a rural community in India. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48, 368–374.
2.
AhmedA. M.SalasO. (2009). Is the hand of God involved in human cooperation?International Journal of Social Economics, 36, 70–80.
3.
AndersonL.MellorJ.MilyoJ. (2010). Did the devil make them do it? The effects of religion in public goods and trust games. Kyklos, 63, 163–175.
4.
AtkinsonQ. D.BourratP. (2011). Beliefs about God, the afterlife and morality support the role of supernatural policing in human cooperation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 41–49.
5.
BaileyR. C.DoriotP. D. (1985). Perceptions of professionals who express religious beliefs. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 13, 167–170.
6.
BaileyR. C.YoungM. D. (1986). The value and vulnerability of perceived religious involvement. The Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 693–694.
7.
BearA.RandD. G. (2016). Intuition, deliberation, and the evolution of cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 936–941.
8.
BellemareC.KrögerS. (2007). On representative social capital. European Economic Review, 51, 183–202.
9.
Ben-NerA.McCallB. P.StephaneM.WangH. (2009). Identity and in-group/out-group differentiation in work and giving behaviors: Experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 72, 153–170.
10.
BenzM.MeierS. (2008). Do people behave in experiments as in the field?—Evidence from donations. Experimental Economics, 11, 268–281.
11.
BergJ.DickhautJ.McCabeK. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 122–142.
12.
De BottonA. (2012). Religion for Atheists: A Non-believer’s Guide to the Uses of Religion. New York City, NY: Pantheon Books.
13.
EckelC. C.GrossmanP. J. (2003). Rebate versus matching: Does how we subsidize charitable contributions matter?Journal of Public Economics, 87, 681–701.
14.
EckelC. C.GrossmanP. J. (2004). Giving to secular causes by the religious and nonreligious: An experimental test of the responsiveness of giving to subsidies. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33, 271–289.
15.
EdgellP.GerteisJ.HartmannD. (2006). Atheists as “other”: Moral boundaries and cultural membership in American society. American Sociological Review, 71, 211–234.
16.
EverettJ. A.FaberN. S.CrockettM. (2015). Preferences and beliefs in ingroup favoritism. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 9.
17.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior research methods, 41(4), 1149–1160.
18.
ForsytheR.HorowitzJ. L.SavinN. E.SeftonM. (1994). Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 6, 347–369.
19.
FranzenA.PointnerS. (2013). The external validity of giving in the dictator game. Experimental Economics, 16, 155–169.
20.
GalenL. W. (2012). Does religious belief promote prosociality? A critical examination. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 876–906. doi:10.1037/a0028251
21.
GervaisW. M. (2011). Finding the faithless: Perceived atheist prevalence reduces anti-atheist prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 543–556.
22.
GervaisW. M.ShariffA. F.NorenzayanA. (2011). Do you believe in atheists? Distrust is central to anti-atheist prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1189–1206.
23.
HoutM.FischerC. S. (2002). Why more Americans have no religious preference: Politics and generations. American Sociological Review, 67, 165–190.
24.
HuberS.HuberO. W. (2012). The centrality of religiosity scale (CRS). Religions, 3 (3), 710–724.
25.
JamesW. (1985). The varieties of religious experience (Vol. 13). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1902)
26.
LewisV. A.MacGregorC. A.PutnamR. D. (2013). Religion, networks, and neighborliness: The impact of religious social networks on civic engagement. Social Science Research, 42, 331–346.
27.
McKayR.EffersonC.WhitehouseH.FehrE. (2011). Wrath of God: Religious primes and punishment. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 278, 1858–1863.
28.
MonsmaS. V. (2007). Religion and philanthropic giving and volunteering: Building blocks for civic responsibility. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion, 3, 1–28.
29.
OrbellJ.GoldmanM.MulfordM.DawesR. (1992). Religion, context, and constraint toward strangers. Rationality and Society, 4, 291–307.
30.
PaciottiB.RichersonP.BaumB.LubellM.WaringT.McElreathR.…EdstenE. (2011). Are religious individuals more generous, trusting, and cooperative? An experimental test of the effect of religion on prosociality. Research in Economic Anthropology, 31, 267–305.
31.
PeysakhovichA.NowakM. A.RandD. G. (2014). Humans display a ‘cooperative phenotype’ that is domain general and temporally stable. Nature Communications, 5, 1–8.
PrestonJ. L.RitterR. S.Ivan HernandezJ. (2010). Principles of religious prosociality: A review and reformulation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 574–590.
34.
PutnamR. D.CampbellD. E. (2010). American grace. How religion divides and Unites Us. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
35.
RandD. G.GreeneJ. D.NowakM. A. (2012). Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature, 489, 427–430.
36.
RandD. G.NewmanG. E.WurzbacherO. (2015). Social context and the dynamics of cooperative choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 28, 159–166.
RuffleB. J.SosisR. (2006). Cooperation and the in-group-out-group bias: A field test on Israeli kibbutz members and city residents. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 60, 147–163.
39.
ShenhavA.RandD. G.GreeneJ. D. (2012). Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 423–438.
40.
TanJ. H. (2006). Religion and social preferences: An experimental study. Economics Letters, 90, 60–67.
41.
TanJ. H.VogelC. (2008). Religion and trust: An experimental study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 832–848.
42.
XygalatasD. (2013). Effects of religious setting on cooperative behavior: A case study from Mauritius. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 3, 91–102.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
