A set of studies explored the possibility to instill hope for peace in the context of intractable conflicts. The first study examined Jewish-Israelis’ hopes for peace following a message from an out-group communicator. Results show that participants’ hopes increased after viewing a Palestinian conclude that the conflict was solvable. This held true regardless of whether the Palestinian communicator identified as a militant or a peace activist. However, Jewish-Israelis’ hopes for peace were not altered when an article, ostensibly written by conflict experts, concluded that the Palestinian–Israeli conflict was resolvable. In order to explore whether these trends are unique to group members involved in intergroup conflict, we replicated the study on uninvolved third-party participants. The article offers a comparison of belief malleability between those who experience conflict first hand and those who observe it from afar and presents strategies that may instill hope for peace in group members immersed in protracted violent conflicts.
AdwanS.Bar-TalD.WexlerB. E. (2014). Portrayal of the other in Palestinian and Israel schoolbooks: A comparative study. Political Psychology. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12227
2.
AverillJ.SundararajanL. (2005). Hope as a rhetoric: Cultural narratives of wishing and coping. In EliottJ. (Ed.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on hope (pp. 133–166). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
3.
Bar-TalD. (1998). Societal beliefs in times of intractable conflict: The Israeli case. International Journal of Conflict Management, 9, 22–50.
4.
Bar-TalD. (2001). Why does fear override hope in societies engulfed by intractable conflict, as it does in the Israeli society?Political Psychology, 22, 601–627.
5.
Bar-TalD. (2007). Sociopsychological foundations of intractable conflicts. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1430–1453. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1177/0002764207302462
6.
Bar-TalD. (2013). Intractable conflicts. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Bar-TalD.HalperinE.OrenN. (2010). Sociopsychological barriers to peace making: The case of the Israeli Jewish society. Social Issues and Policy Review, 4, 63–109.
8.
Bar-TalD.RosenY. (2009). Peace education in societies involved in intractable conflicts: Direct and indirect models. Review of Educational Research, 79, 557–575.
9.
BerinskyA. J.HuberG. A.LenzG. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20, 351–368. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr057
10.
BitonY.SalomonG. (2006). Peace in the eyes of Israeli and Palestinian youths: Effects of collective narratives and peace education program. Journal of Peace Research, 43, 167–180. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1177/0022343306061888
ChaikenS.DuckworthK. L.DarkeP. (1999). When parsimony fails…Psychological Inquiry, 10, 118–123.
13.
Cohen-ChenS.CrispR. J.HalperinE. (2015). Perceptions of a changing world induce hope and promote peace in intractable conflicts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 498–512. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215573210
14.
Cohen-ChenS.HalperinE.CrispR. J.GrossJ. J. (2014). Hope in the Middle East: Malleability beliefs, hope, and the willingness to compromise for peace. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 67–75. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613484499
15.
ColemanP. T. (2003). Characteristics of protracted, intractable conflict: Toward the development of a metaframework-I. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 9, 1–37.
16.
DechenauxE.KovenockD.SheremetaR. M. (2014). A survey of experimental research on contests, all-pay auctions and tournaments. Experimental Economics, 1–61. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-014-9421-0
17.
De ZavalaA. G.FedericoC. M.CisłakA.SiggerJ. (2008). Need for closure and competition in intergroup conflicts: Experimental evidence for the mitigating effect of accessible conflict-schemas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 84–105. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.438
18.
DownieR. S. (1963). Hope. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 24, 248–251. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.2307/2104466
19.
FeldmanS.JohnstonC. (2014). Understanding the determinants of political ideology: Implications of structural complexity: Understanding political ideology. Political Psychology, 35, 337–358. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12055
20.
GingesJ.AtranS.MedinD.ShikakiK. (2007). Sacred bounds on rational resolution of violent political conflict. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 7357–7360.
21.
GoodmanJ. K.CryderC. E.CheemaA. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples: Data collection in a flat world. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 213–224. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1753
22.
HalperinE.RussellA. G.TrzesniewskiK. H.GrossJ. J.DweckC. S. (2011). Promoting the Middle East peace process by changing beliefs about group malleability. Science, 333, 1767–1769. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1126/science.1202925
23.
HammackP. L. (2006). Identity, conflict, and coexistence life stories of Israeli and Palestinian adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21, 323–369. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1177/0743558406289745
24.
HayesA. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
25.
JarymowiczM.Bar-TalD. (2006). The dominance of fear over hope in the life of individuals and collectives. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 367–392. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.302
26.
KelmanH. C. (1998). Social-psychological contributions to peacemaking and peacebuilding in the Middle East. Applied Psychology, 47, 5–28.
27.
KriesbergL. (1998). Intractable conflicts. In WeinerE. (Ed.), The handbook of interethnic coexistence (pp. 332–342). New York, NY: Continuum.
28.
LazarusR. (1999). Hope: An emotion and a vital coping resource against despair. Social Research, 66, 653–678.
29.
MaozI. (2000). An experiment in peace: Reconciliation-aimed workshops of Jewish-Israeli and Palestinian youth. Journal of Peace Research, 37, 721–736. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1177/0022343300037006004
30.
MaozI.ShikakiK. (2014, 12). Joint Israeli Palestinian poll. The Harry S. Truman Research Institute for the Advancement of Peace, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
NeumanW. R.MarcusG.CriglerA.MackuenM. (2007). Theorizing affect’s effects. In NeumanW. R.MarcusG.CriglerA.MackuenM. (Eds.), The affect effect (pp. 1–20). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33.
PenningtonN.HastieR. (1991). Cognitive theory of Juror decision making: The story model, A. Cardozo Law Review, 13, 519.
34.
PettyR. E.WheelerS. C.BizerG. Y. (1999). Is there one persuasion process or more? Lumping versus splitting in attitude change theories. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 156–163.
35.
RouhanaN. N.Bar-TalD. (1998). Psychological dynamics of intractable ethnonational conflicts: The Israeli–Palestinian case. American Psychologist, 53, 761.
36.
SagyS.AdwanS. (2006). Hope in times of threat: The case of Israeli and Palestinian youth. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76, 128–133. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.76.1.128
37.
StaatsS. R. (1989). Hope: A comparison of two self-report measures for adults. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 366–375.
38.
StotlandE. (1969). The psychology of hope. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
39.
TelhamiS.KullS. (2013). Israeli and Palestinian public opinion on negotiating a final status peace agreement. Washington, DC: Saban Center at the Brookings Institution.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
