Mate poaching refers to efforts to attract people who are already involved in committed relationships. The current dyadic, 5-week prospective study examined mate poaching behaviors in the context of opposite-sex friendships. Actors’ mate poaching behaviors predicted decreases in their friend’s commitment to their romantic partners, increases in their friend’s perceptions of actors’ mate value, and increases in their friend’s romantic desire for actors over time. These results are the first to suggest an interpersonal process in which mate poaching behaviors elicit psychological changes in targets that facilitate actors’ mate poaching goals. Furthermore, these results are the first to demonstrate the effectiveness of mate poaching tactics in friendships.
ArnockyS.SunderaniS.VaillancourtT. (2013). Mate-poaching and mating success in humans. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 65–83.
2.
BirnbaumG. E.ReisH. T. (2012). When does responsiveness pique sexual interest? Attachment and sexual desire in initial acquaintanceships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 946–958.
3.
Bleske-RechekA.SomersE.MickeC.EricksonL.MattesonL.StoccoC.…RitchieL. (2012). Benefit or burden? Attraction in cross-sex friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 569–596.
4.
BolgerN.LaurenceauJ.-P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
5.
BussD. M. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 616–628. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.616
6.
BussD. M.ShackelfordT. K. (1997). From vigilance to violence: Mate retention tactics in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 346–361.
7.
DaviesA. P.ShackelfordT. K. (2015). Comparisons of the effectiveness of mate-attraction tactics across mate poaching and general attraction and across types of romantic relationships. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 140–144.
8.
DaviesA. P.ShackelfordT. K.HassR. G. (2010). Sex differences in perceptions of benefits and costs of mate poaching. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 441–445.
9.
EastwickP. W.FinkelE. J. (2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 245–264.
10.
EdlundJ. E.SagarinB. J. (2014). The mate value scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 72–77.
11.
EndersC. K.TofighiD. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121–138.
12.
FosterJ. D.JonasonP. K.ShriraI.CampbellW. K.ShiverdeckerL. K.VarnerS. C. (2014). What do you get when you make somebody else’s partner your own? An analysis of relationships formed via mate poaching. Journal of Research in Personality, 52, 78–90.
13.
GangestadS. W.SimpsonJ. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–587.
14.
HalatsisP.ChristakisN. (2009). The challenge of sexual attraction within heterosexuals’ cross-sex friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 919–937.
15.
HatfieldE.SprecherS. (2009). The passionate love scale. In FisherT. D.DavisC. M.YaberW. L.DavisS. L. (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures: A compendium (3rd ed., pp. 466–468). Thousand Oaks, CA: Taylor & Francis.
16.
HendrickC.HendrickS. (1986). A theory and method of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 392–402.
17.
HolmbergD.VeroffJ. (1996). Rewriting relationship memories: The effects of courtship and wedding scripts. In FletcherG. J. O.FitnessJ. (Eds.), Knowledge structures in close relationships: A social psychological approach (pp. 345–368). New York, NY: Lawrence.
18.
JohnsonD. J.RusbultC. E. (1989). Resisting temptation: Devaluation of alternative partners as a means of maintaining commitment in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 967–980.
19.
JonasonP. K.LiN. P.BussD. M. (2010). The costs and benefits of the Dark Triad: Implications for mate poaching and mate retention tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 373–378.
20.
KaplanD. L.KeysC. B. (1997). Sex and relationship variables as predictors of sexual attraction in cross-sex platonic friendships between young heterosexual adults. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 191–206.
21.
KardumI.Hudek-KnezevicJ.SchmittD. P.GrundlerP. (2015). Personality and mate poaching experiences. Personality and Individual Differences, 75, 7–12.
22.
LeB.DoveN. L.AgnewC. R.KornM. S.MutsoA. A. (2010). Predicting nonmarital romantic relationship dissolution: A meta-analytic synthesis. Personal Relationships, 17, 377–390.
23.
LemayE. P.JrNealA. M. (2013). The wishful memory of interpersonal responsiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 653–672.
24.
LydonJ. E.MeanaM.SepinwallD.RichardsN.MaymanS. (1999). The commitment calibration hypothesis: When do people devalue attractive alternatives?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 152–161.
25.
McFarlandC.RossM. (1987). The relation between current impressions and memories of self and dating partners. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 228–238. doi:10.1177/0146167287132008
26.
MillerR. S. (1997). Inattentive and contented: Relationship commitment and attention to alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 758–766.
27.
MogilskiJ.WadeT. J. (2013). Friendship as a relationship infiltration tactic during human mate poaching. Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 926–943.
28.
MuthénB.AsparouhovT. (2012). Bayesian structural equation modeling: A more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychological Methods, 17, 313–335.
29.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 599–620.
30.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
31.
NealA. M.LemayE. P. (2014). How partners’ temptation leads to their heightened commitment The interpersonal regulation of infidelity threats. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31, 938–957.
32.
NicholsonJ. (2013). Avoiding the friend zone: Becoming a girlfriend or boyfriend. Psychology Today. Retrieved fromhttp://www.psychologytoday.com
33.
NisbettR. E.WilsonT. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.
34.
RusbultC. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101–117.
35.
RusbultC. E.MartzJ. M.AgnewC. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357–391.
36.
SanitiosoR.KundaZ.FongG. T. (1990). Motivated recruitment of autobiographical memories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 229–241. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.2.229
37.
SchmittD. P. (2004). Patterns and universals of mate poaching across 53 nations: The effects of sex, culture, and personality on romantically attracting another person’s partner. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 560–584.
38.
SchmittD. P.BussD. M. (2001). Human mate poaching: Tactics and temptations for infiltrating existing mateships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 894–917.
39.
SelyaA. S.RoseJ. S.DierkerL. C.HedekerD.MermelsteinR. J. (2012). A practical guide to calculating Cohen’s f2, a measure of local effect size, from PROC MIXED. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 111.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
