Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Across three experiments, participants formed a larger number of categories when in a state of high, compared to low, psychological power. Moreover, in contrast to prior categorization research, which suggests forming more categories is tantamount to reduced breadth of categorization, high-power participants also formed a larger number of superordinate (i.e., more abstract) categories than low-power participants. The present findings enhance the understanding of power in relation to categorization and simultaneously highlight the distinction between number and abstraction as fundamental aspects of categorization.

Keywords

power breadth of categorization abstraction

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albarracín

Handley

I. M.

Noguchi

McCulloch

K. C.

Leeper

… Hart

W. P.

(2008). Increasing and decreasing motor and cognitive output: A model of general action and inaction goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 510–523.

Block

Buss

D. M.

Block

J. H.

Gjerde

P. F.

(1981). The cognitive style of breadth of categorization: Longitudinal consistency of personality correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 770–779.

Chen

Ybarra

Kiefer

A. K.

(2004). Power and impression formation: The effects of power on the desire for morality and competence information. Social Cognition, 22, 391–421.

Chi

M. T. H.

Feltovich

P. J.

Glaser

(1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.

French

J. R. P.

Jr Raven

(1959). The bases of social power. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

Friedman

R. S.

Förster

(2000). The effects of approach and avoidance motor actions on the elements of creative insight. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 477–492.

Galinsky

A. D.

Gruenfeld

D. H.

Magee

J. C.

(2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453–466.

Galinsky

A. D.

Magee

J. C.

Gruenfeld

D. H.

Whitson

J. A.

Liljenquist

K. A.

(2008). Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1450–1466.

Galinsky

A. D.

Rucker

D. D.

Magee

J. C.

(2015). Power: Past findings, present considerations, and future directions. In Simpson

J. A.

Dovidio

J. F.

(Assoc. Eds.), Mikulincer

Shaver

P. R.

(Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 3: Interpersonal relationships (pp. 421–460). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

10.

Goldberg

L. R.

(1986). The validity of rating procedures to index the hierarchical level of categories. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 323–347.

11.

Gruenfeld

D. H.

(1995). Status, ideology, and integrative complexity on the U.S. Supreme Court: Rethinking the politics of political decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 5–20.

12.

Gruenfeld

D. H.

Preston

(2000). Upending the status quo: Cognitive complexity in U.S. Supreme Court justices who overturn legal precedent. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1013–1022.

13.

Gruenfeld

D. H.

Thomas-Hunt

M. C.

Kim

P. H.

(1998). Cognitive flexibility, communication strategy, and integrative complexity in groups: Public versus private reactions to majority and minority status. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 202–226.

14.

Guinote

(2007). Power affects basic cognition: Increased attentional inhibition and flexibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 685–697.

15.

Guinote

Judd

C. M.

Brauer

(2002). Effects of power on perceived and objective group variability: Evidence that more powerful groups are more variable. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 708–721.

16.

Gülden

Ü.

Chakravarti

Morwitz

V. G.

(2010). Categories create mind-sets: The effect of exposure to broad versus narrow categorizations on subsequent unrelated decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 659–671.

17.

Hamilton

R. W.

Puntoni

Tavassoli

N. T.

(2010). Categorization by groups and individuals. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 112, 70–81.

18.

Huang

Galinsky

A. D.

Gruenfeld

D. H.

Guillory

L. E.

(2011). Powerful postures vs. powerful roles: Which is the proximate correlate of thought and behavior? Psychological Science, 22, 95–102.

19.

Isen

A. M.

Daubman

K. A.

(1984). The influence of affect on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1206–1217.

20.

Lammers

Galinsky

A. D.

Gordijn

E. H.

Otten

(2012). Power increases social distance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 282–290.

21.

Langner

C. A.

Keltner

(2008). Social power and emotional experience: Actor and partner effects within dyadic interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 848–856.

22.

Lee

Ariely

(2006). Shopping goals, goal concreteness, and conditional promotions. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 60–70.

23.

Levy

S. R.

Freitas

A. L.

Salovey

(2002). Construing action abstractly and blurring social distinctions: Implications for perceiving homogeneity among, but also empathizing with and helping, others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1224–1238.

24.

Liberman

Sagristano

M. D.

Trope

(2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 523–534.

25.

Lin

E. L.

Murphy

G. L.

Shoben

E. J.

(1997). The effects of prior processing episodes on basic-level superiority. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 50, 25–48.

26.

Magee

J. C.

Milliken

F. J.

Lurie

A. R.

(2010). Power differences in the construal of a crisis: The immediate aftermath of September 11, 2001. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 354–370.

27.

Magee

J. C.

Smith

P. K.

(2013). The social distance theory of power. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 158–186.

28.

Markman

A. B.

Wisniewski

E. J.

(1997). Similar and different: The differentiation of basic-level categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 54–70.

29.

Medin

D. L.

Lynch

E. B.

Coley

J. D.

Atran

(1997). Categorization and reasoning among tree experts: Do all roads lead to Rome? Cognitive Psychology, 32, 49–96.

30.

Mikulincer

Kedem

Paz

(1990). Anxiety and categorization: I. The structure and boundaries of mental categories. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 805–814.

31.

Mikulincer

Paz

Kedem

(1990). Anxiety and categorization: II. Hierarchical levels of mental categories. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 815–821.

32.

Murray

Sujan

Hirt

E. R.

Sujan

(1990). The influence of mood on categorization: A cognitive flexibility interpretation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 411–425.

33.

Overbeck

J. R.

Park

(2001). When power does not corrupt: Superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 549–565.

34.

Overbeck

J. R.

Park

(2006). Powerful perceivers, powerless objects: Flexibility of powerholders’ social attention. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 227–243.

35.

Pople

H. E.

(1977). The formation of composite hypotheses in diagnostic problem solving: An exercise in synthetic reasoning. In Reddy

(Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1030–1037). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

36.

Quinn

W. M.

Kinoshita

(2008). Congruence effect in semantic categorization with masked primes with narrow and broad categories. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 286–306.

37.

Rosch

(1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192–233.

38.

Rosch

Mervis

C. B.

(1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.

39.

Rosch

Mervis

C. B.

Gray

W. D.

Johnson

D. M.

Boyes-Braem

(1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382–439.

40.

Shafto

Coley

J. D.

(2003 ). Development of categorization and reasoning in the natural world: Novices to experts, naive similarity to ecological knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 641–649

41.

Sligte

D. J.

de Dreu

C. K. W.

Nijstad

B. A.

(2011). Power, stability of power, and creativity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 891–897.

42.

Smallman

Roese

N. J.

(2008). Preference invites categorization. Psychological Science, 19, 1228–1232.

43.

Smith

P. K.

Trope

(2006). You focus on the forest when you’re in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 578–596.

44.

Smith

P. K.

Wigboldus

D. H. J.

Dijksterhuis

(2008). Abstract thinking increases one’s sense of power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 378–385.

45.

Stel

van Dijk

Smith

P. K.

van Dijk

W. W.

Djalal

F. M.

(2012). Lowering the pitch of your voice makes you feel more powerful and think more abstractly. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 497–502.

46.

Trope

Liberman

(2010). Construal level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440–463.

47.

Watson

Clark

L. A.

Tellegen

(1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.

48.

Wortman

P. M.

(1972). Medical diagnosis: An information processing approach. Computers and Biomedical Research, 5, 315–328.

Power and Categorization

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References