People experience pleasantness when they act toward a stimulus in an affectively coherent (e.g., approaching positive stimuli and avoiding negative stimuli) versus incoherent manner. Nevertheless, it is unclear how misattributing this pleasantness resulting from affective coherence can impact human judgment. To this end, we examined the impact of misattributing the pleasantness of affective coherence to a subsequent target (Study 1), depending on the saliency of the target (Study 2). We found that experiencing affective coherence led to more positive impressions of subsequently encountered targets than did experiencing affective incoherence. These results expand our understanding of the role affect can play in human judgment. We discuss some limitations and implications of these findings.
BarghJ. A.ChartrandT. L. (2000). The mind in the middle: A practical guild to priming and automaticity research. In ReisH. T.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 253–285). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BaumeisterR. F.DeWallC. N.VohsK. D.AlquistJ. L. (2010). Does emotion cause behavior (apart from making people do stupid, destructive things)? In AgnewC. R.CarlstonD. E.GrazianoW. G.KellyJ. R. (Eds.), Then a miracle occurs: Focusing on behavior in social psychological theory and research (pp. 119–136). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
3.
CenterbarD. B.CloreG. L. (2006). Do approach-avoidance actions create attitudes?Psychological Science, 17, 22–29.
4.
CenterbarD. B.SchnallS.CloreG. L.GarvinE. D. (2008). Affective incoherence: When affective concepts and embodied reactions clash. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 560–578.
5.
CesarioJ.PlaksJ. E.HigginsE. T. (2006). Automatic social behavior as motivated preparation to interact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 893–910.
6.
ChenM.BarghJ. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 215–224.
7.
CloreG. L. (1992). Cognitive phenomenology: Feelings and the constructions of judgment. In MartisL. L.TesserA. (Eds.), The construction of social judgment (pp. 133–164). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
CloreG. L.ColcombeS. (2003). The parallel worlds of affective concepts and feelings. In MuschJ.KlauerK. C. (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 335–370). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
CloreG. L.GasperK.GarvinE. (2001). Affect as information. In ForgasJ. P. (Ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 121–144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
CloreG. L.HuntsingerJ. R. (2009). How the object of affect guides its impact. Emotion Review, 1, 39–54.
11.
DeMarreeK. G.LoerschC. (2009). Who am I and who are you? Priming and the influence of self versus other focused attention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 440–443.
12.
DeMarreeK. G.MorrisonK. R.WheelerS. C.PettyR. E. (2011). Self-ambivalence and resistance to subtle self-change attempts. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 674–686.
13.
DijksterhuisA. (2004). I like myself but I don’t know why: Enhancing implicit self-esteem by subliminal evaluative conditioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 345–355.
14.
DruV.CretenetJ. (2008). Influence of unilateral motor behaviors on the judgment of valenced stimuli. Cortex, 44, 717–727.
15.
FayantM. P.MullerD.NurraC.AlexopoulosT.Palluel-GermainR. (2011). Moving forward is not only a metaphor: Approach and avoidance lead to self-evaluative assimilation and contrast. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 241–245.
16.
GreifenederR.BlessH.PhamM. T. (2011). When do people rely on affective and cognitive feelings in judgment? A review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 107–141.
17.
HigginsE. T. (2005). Value from regulatory fit. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 209–213.
18.
HigginsE. T.IdsonL. C.FreitasA. L.SpiegelS.MoldenD. C. (2003). Transfer of value from fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1140–1153.
19.
HigginsE. T.RholesW. S.JonesC. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141–154.
20.
ItoT.CacioppoJ. (2005). Variations on a human universal: Individual differences in positivity offset and negativity bias. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 1–26.
21.
ItoT. A.LarsenJ. T.SmithN. K.CacioppoJ. T. (1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: the negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 887–900.
22.
JonesC. R.FazioR. H.OlsonM. A. (2009). Implicit misattribution as a mechanism underlying evaluative conditioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 933–948.
23.
KawakamiK.PhillsC. E.SteeleJ. R.DovidioJ. F. (2007). (Close) distance makes the heart grow fonder: Improving implicit racial attitudes and interracial interactions through approach behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 957–971.
24.
LayardR. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
25.
LoerschC.PayneB. K. (2011). The situated inference model: An integrative account of the effects of primes on perception, behavior, and motivation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 234–252.
26.
NeumannR.StrackF. (2000). Approach and avoidance: The influence of proprioceptive and exteroceptive cues on encoding of affective information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 39–48.
27.
NussinsonR.SeibtB.HäfnerM.StrackF. (2010). Come a bit closer: Approach motor actions lead to feeling similar and behavioral assimilation. Social Cognition, 28, 40–58.
28.
SchwarzN.CloreG. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 513–523.
29.
SchwarzN.CloreG. L. (2003). Mood as information: 20 years later. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 296–303.
30.
SkowronskiJ. J.CarlstonD. E. (1987). Social judgment and social memory: The role of cue diagnosticity in negativity, positivity, and extremity biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 689–699.
31.
SrullT. K.WyerR. S. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660–1672.
32.
ThompsonE. P.RomanR. J.MoskowitzG. B.ChaikenS.BarghJ. A. (1994). Accuracy motivation attenuates covert priming: The systematic reprocessing of social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 479–489.
33.
TuckerD. M.WilliamsonP. A. (1984). Asymmetric neural control systems in human self-regulation. Psychological Review, 91, 185–215.
34.
VaughnL. A.HarknessA. R.ClarkE. K. (2010). The effect of incidental experiences of regulatory fit on trust. Personal Relationships, 17, 57–69.
35.
VaughnL. A.HesseS. J.PetkovaZ.TrudeauL. (2009). “This story is right on”: The impact of regulatory fit on narrative engagement and persuasion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 447–456.
36.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
