The present research provides the first systematic empirical investigation into superhumanization, the attribution of supernatural, extrasensory, and magical mental and physical qualities to humans. Five studies test and support the hypothesis that White Americans superhumanize Black people relative to White people. Studies 1–2b demonstrate this phenomenon at an implicit level, showing that Whites preferentially associate Blacks versus Whites with superhuman versus human words on an implicit association test and on a categorization task. Studies 3–4 demonstrate this phenomenon at an explicit level, showing that Whites preferentially attribute superhuman capacities to Blacks versus Whites, and Study 4 specifically shows that superhumanization of Blacks predicts denial of pain to Black versus White targets. Together, these studies demonstrate a novel and potentially detrimental process through which Whites perceive Blacks.
BonhamV. L. (2001). Race, ethnicity, and pain treatment: Striving to understand the causes and solutions to the disparities in pain treatment. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 29, 52–68.
2.
BrandtM. J.ReynaC. (2011). The chain of being a hierarchy of morality. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 428–446.
3.
BrewerM. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307–324.
4.
CarringtonB. (2010). Race, sport and politics: The sporting Black diaspora. London, England: Sage.
5.
CottrellC. A.NeubergS. L. (2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A sociofunctional threat-based approach to “prejudice.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 770–789.
6.
CrowdusG.GeorgakasD. (2001). Thinking about the power of images: An interview with Spike Lee. Cineaste26, 4–9.
7.
CzoppA. M.MonteithM. J. (2006). Thinking well of African Americans: Measuring complimentary stereotypes and negative prejudice. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28, 233–250.
8.
DemoulinS.SaraglouV.Van PachterbekeM. (2008). Infra-humanizing others, supra-humanizing Gods: The emotional hierarchy. Social Cognition, 26, 235–247.
9.
DevineP. G.ElliotA. J. (1995). Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton Trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1139–1150.
10.
DrweckiB. B.MooreC. F.WardS. E.PrkachinK. M. (2011). Reducing racial disparities in pain treatment: The role of empathy and perspective-taking. Pain, 152, 1001–1006.
11.
EckbladM.ChapmanL. J. (1983). Magical ideation as an indicator of schizotypy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 215.
12.
EntineJ. (2000). Taboo: Why Black athletes dominate sports and why we’re afraid to talk about it. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
13.
GoffP. A.EberhardtJ. L.WilliamsM. J.JacksonM. C. (2008). Not yet human: Implicit knowledge, historical dehumanization, and contemporary consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 292–306.
14.
GrayH. M.GrayK.WegnerD. M. (2007). Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315, 619.
15.
GrayK.WegnerD. M. (2009). Moral typecasting: Divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 505–520.
16.
GrayK.WegnerD. M. (2011). To escape blame, don’t be a hero—Be a victim. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 516–519.
17.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.
18.
GreenwaldA. G.NosekB. A.BanajiM. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. an improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.
19.
HaidtJ. (2003). Elevation and the positive psychology of morality. In KeyesC. L. M.HaidtJ. (Eds.). Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived (pp. 275–289). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
20.
HaidtJ.AlgoeS. (2004). Moral amplification and the emotions that attach us to saints and demons. In GreenbergJ.KooleS. L.PyszczynskiT. A. (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 322–335). New York, NY: Guilford.
21.
Harris-LacewellM. (2001). African American political attitudes and the myth of Black women’s strength. Women & Politics, 23, 1–33.
22.
HaslamN. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 252–264.
23.
HaslamN.KashimaY.LoughnanS.ShiJ.SuitnerC. (2008). Subhuman, inhuman, and superhuman: Contrasting humans with nonhumans in three cultures. Social Cognition, 26, 248–258.
24.
HaslamN.LoughnanS. (2014). Dehumanization and infrahumanization. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 399–423.
25.
HicksH. J. (2003). Hoodoo economics: White men’s work and Black men’s magic in contemporary American film. Camera Obscura, 18, 27–55.
26.
HodsonG.CostelloK. (2007). Interpersonal disgust, ideological orientations, and dehumanization as predictors of intergroup attitudes. Psychological Science, 18, 691–698.
27.
HugheyM. W. (2009). Cinethetic racism: White redemption and Black stereotypes in “Magical Negro” films. Social Problems, 56, 543–577.
28.
KayA. C.DayM. V.ZannaM. P.NussbaumA. D. (2013). The insidious (and ironic) effects of positive stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 287–291.
29.
LeyensJ-P.PaladinoP. M.Rodriguez-TorresR.VaesJ.DemoulinS.Rodriguez-PerezA.GauntR. (2000). The emotional side of prejudice: The attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 186–197.
30.
MacDonaldD. A. (2000). Spirituality: Description, measurement, and relation to the five factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 68, 153–197.
31.
MadonS.GuyllM.AboufadelK.MontielE.SmithA.PalumboP.JussimL. (2001). Ethnic and national stereotypes: The Princeton trilogy revisited and revised. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 996–1010.
32.
MathurV. A.HaradaT.LipkeT.ChiaoJ. Y. (2010). Neural basis of extraordinary empathy and altruistic motivation. Neuroimage, 51, 1468–1475.
33.
MinearM.ParkD. C. (2004). Lifespan database of adult facial stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, 36, 630–633.
34.
NederhofA. J. (1985). Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 263–280.
35.
PayneB. K. (2001). Prejudice and perception: The role of automatic and controlled processes in misperceiving a weapon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 181–192.
36.
PitnerR. O.AstorR. A.BenbenishtyR.Haj-YahiaM. M.ZeiraA. (2003). The effects of group stereotypes on adolescents’ reasoning about peer retribution. Child Development, 74, 413–425.
37.
RattanA.LevineC. S.DweckC. S.EberhardtJ. L. (2012). Race and the fragility of the legal distinction between juveniles and adults. PLoS ONE, 7, e36680.
38.
ScottA. B. (2006). Superpower vs. supernatural: Black superheroes and the quest for a mutant reality. Journal of Visual Culture, 5, 295–314.
39.
SignorellaM. L.BiglerR. S.LibenL. S. (1993). Developmental differences in children’s gender schemata about others: A meta-analytic review. Developmental Review, 13, 147–183.
40.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In WorchelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
41.
TobacykJ. J. (1988). A revised paranormal belief scale. Unpublished manuscript, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA.
42.
TrawalterS.HoffmanK. M.WaytzA. (2012). Racial bias in perceptions of others’ pain. PLoS ONE, 7, e48546.
43.
VikiG. T.CalitriR. (2008). Infrahuman outgroup or suprahuman ingroup: The role of nationalism and patriotism in the infrahumanization of outgroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1054–1061.
44.
VikiG. T.WinchesterL.TitshallL.ChisangoT.PinaA.RussellR. (2006). Beyond secondary emotions: The infrahumanization of outgroups using human-related and animal-related words. Social Cognition, 24, 753–775.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
