Members of stigmatized social groups are typically more authoritarian than their nonstigmatized or higher status counterparts. We draw on research demonstrating that authoritarianism compensates for the negative effects of stigma to predict that this endorsement will be more psychologically beneficial (and less harmful) for the stigmatized compared to their high-status counterparts. Consistent with this idea, data from the 2008 (N = 2,322) and 2012 (N = 5,916) American National Election Study indicate that for members of stigmatized social groups (low income, low education, and ethnic minority), authoritarian child rearing values have more positive psychological effects than for members of high-status groups. These results were robust to covariates, including demographics, religiosity, political ideology, and cognitive style.
AdornoT. W.Frenkel-BrunswikE.LevinsonD. J.SanfordR. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
2.
AltemeyerB. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
AydinN.KruegerJ. I.FischerJ.HahnD.KastenmüllerA.FreyD.FischerP. (2012). “Man’s best friend:” How the presence of a dog reduces mental distress after social exclusion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 48, 446–449.
BrandtM. J.HenryP. J. (2012). Gender inequality and gender differences in authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1301–1315.
6.
BrandtM. J.ReynaC. (2014). To love or hate thy neighbor: The role of core motives in explaining the link between fundamentalism and racial prejudice. Political Psychology, 35, 207–223.
7.
CacioppoJ. T.HawkleyL. C. (2009). Perceived social isolation and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 447–454.
8.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E.Feng KaoC. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306–307.
9.
CrockerJ.VoelklK.TestaM.MajorB. (1991). Social stigma: The affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 218–228.
10.
EdlundL.PandeR. (2002). Why have women become left-wing? The political gender gap and the decline in marriage. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 917–961.
11.
FarnenR. F.MeloenJ. D. (2000). Democracy, authoritarianism and education: A cross-national empirical survey. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
12.
FedericoC. M. (2004). Predicting attitude extremity: The interactive effects of schema development and the need to evaluate and their mediation by evaluative integration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1281–1294.
13.
FedericoC. M.FisherE. L.DeasonG. (2011). Expertise and the ideological consequences of the authoritarian predisposition. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75, 686–708.
14.
FeldmanS. (2003). Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 24, 41–74.
15.
FeldmanS.StennerK. (1997). Perceived threat and authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 18, 741–770.
16.
GebauerJ. E.SedikidesC.NeberichW. (2012). Religiosity, social self-esteem, and psychological adjustment on the cross-cultural specificity of the psychological benefits of religiosity. Psychological Science, 23, 158–160.
17.
Gibson-DavisC. M. (2009). Money, marriage, and children: Testing the financial expectations and family formation theory. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 146–160.
18.
HärkönenJ.DronkersJ. (2006). Stability and change in the educational gradient of divorce. A comparison of seventeen countries. European Sociological Review, 22, 501–517.
19.
HenryP. J. (2008). College sophomores in the laboratory redux: Influences of a narrow database on social psychology’s view of the nature of prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 19, 49–71.
20.
HenryP. J. (2009). Low-status compensation: A theory for understanding the role of status in cultures of honor. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 451–466.
21.
HenryP. J. (2011). The role of stigma in understanding ethnicity differences in authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 32, 419–438.
22.
HetheringtonM.WeilerJ. (2009). Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
23.
HetheringtonM.SuhayE. (2011). Authoritarianism, threat, and Americans’ support for the war on terror. American Journal of Political Science, 55, 546–560.
24.
JarvisW. B. G.PettyR. E. (1996). The need to evaluate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 172–194.
25.
JettenJ.HaslamS. A.BarlowF. K. (2013). Bringing back the system: One reason why conservatives are happier than liberals is that higher socioeconomic status gives them access to more group memberships. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 6–13.
26.
JohnsonS. E.RichesonJ. A.FinkelE. J. (2011). Middle class and marginal? Socioeconomic status, stigma, and self-regulation at an elite university. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 838–858.
27.
KahnemanD.KruegerA. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20, 3–24.
28.
LimC.PutnamR. D. (2010). Religion, social networks, and life satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 75, 914–933.
29.
LipsetS. M. (1959). Democracy and working-class authoritarianism. American Sociological Review, 24, 482–501.
30.
LucasR. E. (2005). Time does not heal all wounds a longitudinal study of reaction and adaptation to divorce. Psychological Science, 16, 945–950.
31.
MandelD. R.OmorogbeP. (2014). Political differences in past, present, and future life satisfaction: Republicans are more sensitive than democrats to political climate. PloS One, 9, e98854.
32.
MajorB.O’BrienL. T. (2005). The social psychology of stigma. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 393–421.
33.
MroczekD. K.SpiroA.III (2005). Change in life satisfaction during adulthood: Findings from the veterans affairs normative aging study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 189–202.
34.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2011). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
35.
NapierJ. L.JostJ. T. (2008a). The “Antidemocratic Personality” revisited: A cross-national investigation of working-class authoritarianism. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 595–617.
36.
NapierJ. L.JostJ. T. (2008b). Why are conservatives happier than liberals?Psychological Science, 19, 565–572.
37.
Okulicz-KozarynA. (2010). Religiosity and life satisfaction across nations. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 13, 155–169.
38.
OnraetE.Van HielA.DhontK. (2013). The relationship between right-wing ideological attitudes and psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 509–522.
39.
OnraetE.Van HielA.DhontK.PattymS. (2013). Internal and external threat in relationship with right-wing attitudes. Journal of Personality, 81, 233–248.
40.
OnraetE.Van HielA. (2014). Are right-wing adherents mentally troubled? Recent insights on the relationship of right-wing attitudes with threat and psychological ill-being. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 35–40.
41.
PinelE. C. (1999). Stigma consciousness: The psychological legacy of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 114–128.
42.
RuiterS.Van TubergenF. (2009). Religious attendance in cross-national perspective: A multilevel analysis of 60 countries. American Journal of Sociology, 115, 863–895.
43.
SalesS. M. (1973). Threat as a factor in authoritarianism: An analysis of archival data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 44–57.
44.
SchumannK.RossM. (2010). Why women apologize more than men: Gender differences in thresholds for perceiving offensive behavior. Psychological Science, 21, 1649–1655.
45.
ShafferB.DuckittJ. (2013). The dimensional structure of people’s fears, threats, and concerns and their relationship with right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation. International Journal of Psychology, 48, 6–17.
46.
StennerK. (2005). The authoritarian dynamic. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
47.
StephensN. M.MarkusH. R.TownsendS. S. (2007). Choice as an act of meaning: The case of social class. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 814–830.
48.
StillmanT. F.BaumeisterR. F.LambertN. M.CrescioniA. W.DeWallC. N.FinchamF. D. (2009). Alone and without purpose: Life loses meaning following social exclusion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 686–694.
49.
StoneA. A.SchwartzJ. E.BroderickJ. E.DeatonA. (2010). A snapshot of the age distribution of psychological well-being in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 9985–9990.
50.
Van BeestI.WilliamsK. D. (2006). When inclusion costs and ostracism pays, ostracism still hurts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 918.
51.
Van HielA.De ClercqB. (2009). Authoritarianism is good for you: Right-wing authoritarianism as a buffering factor for mental distress. European Journal of Personality, 23, 33–50.
52.
WitterR. A.StockW. A.OkunM. A.HaringM. J. (1985). Religion and subjective well-being in adulthood: A quantitative synthesis. Review of Religious Research, 26, 332–342.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
