Some studies have revealed evidence for proximity seeking following interpersonal rejection, whereas other studies have found evidence of relational distancing (Williams, 2007). This study examined whether both processes could occur simultaneously within face-to-face interactions. Participants were accepted or rejected by one person and then interacted with a new partner for the purposes of an impression-formation task. Conversations were recorded and transcribed. Dyads containing a previously rejected compared to accepted participant exhibited higher levels of linguistic style matching and reciprocated conversational content, suggestive of proximity seeking. However, rejected targets also rated their new partners as less kind and reported lower levels of rapport/liking for their partners, consistent with relational distancing. Partner evaluations were statistically mediated by targets’ expectations of rejection. We suggest that automatic proximity seeking and the appraisal-mediated devaluation of new partners reflect efforts to minimize the potential for and pain of future rejection. Recommendations for future research are discussed.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
2.
BernieriF. J.RosenthalR. (1991). Interpersonal coordination: Behavioral matching and interactional synchrony. In FeldmanR.RimeB. (Eds.), Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior (pp. 401–432). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BernsteinM. J.ClaypoolH. M. (2012). Social exclusion and pain sensitivity: Why exclusion sometimes hurts and sometimes numbs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 185–196. doi:10.1177/0146167211422449
4.
CassidyJ.KobakR. R. (1988). Avoidance and its relationship with other defensive processes. In BelskyJ.NezworskiT. (Eds.), Clinical implications of attachment (pp. 300–323). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
CohnM. A.MehlM. R.PennebakerJ. W. (2004). Linguistic markers of psychological change surrounding September 11, 2001. Psychological Science, 15, 697–683. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.1
6.
DeWallC. N.BaumeisterR. F. (2006). Alone but feeling no pain: Effects of social exclusion on physical pain tolerance and pain threshold, affective forecasting, and interpersonal empathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1–15. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.1
7.
DeWallC. N.ManerJ. K.RoubyD. A. (2009). Social exclusion and early-stage interpersonal perception: Selective attention to signs of acceptance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 729–741. doi:10.1097/PSY.0b013e3182464dd1
8.
EisenbergerN. I.LiebermanM. D.WilliamsK. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302, 290–292. doi:10.1126/science.1089134
9.
GardnerW. L.PickettC. L.BrewerM. B. (2000). Social exclusion and selective memory: How the need to belong influences memory for social events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 486–496. doi:10.1177/0146167200266007
10.
GonzalesA. L.HancockJ. T.PennebakerJ. W. (2010). Language style matching as a predictor of social dynamics in small groups. Communication Research, 37, 3–19. doi:10.1177/0093650209351468
11.
GriskeviciusV.GoldsteinN. J.MortensenC. R.CialdiniR. B.KenrickD. T. (2006). Going along versus going alone: When fundamental motives facilitate strategic (non)conformity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 281–294. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.281
12.
HadjistavropoulosT.CraigD. D. (2002). A theoretical framework for understanding self-report and observational measures of pain: A communications model. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 40, 551–570. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00072-9
13.
HayesA. F. (1998). Within-study meta-analysis: Pooling the significance of doubly nonindependent (nonoverlapping) correlations. Psychological Methods, 3, 32–45. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.1.32
14.
HessY. D.PickettC. L. (2010). Social rejection and self-versus other-awareness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 453–456. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.004
15.
IrelandM. E.PennebakerJ. W. (2010). Language style matching in writing: Synchrony in essays, correspondence, and poetry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 549–571. doi:10.1037/a0020386
16.
KnowlesM. L.GardnerW. L. (2008). Benefits of membership: The activation and amplification of group identities in response to social rejection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1200–1213. doi:10.1177/0146167208320062
17.
KrossE.BermanM. G.MischelW.SmithE. E.WagerT. D. (2011). Social rejection shares somatosensory representations with physical pain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)108, 6270–6275. doi:10.1073/pnas.1102693108
18.
LakinJ. L.ChartrandT. L. (2005). Exclusion and nonconscious behavioral mimicry. In WilliamsK. D.ForgasJ. P.Von HippelW. (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 279–295). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
19.
LakinJ. L.ChartrandT. L.ArkinR. M. (2008). I am too just like you: Nonconscious mimicry as an automatic behavioral response to social exclusion. Psychological Science, 19, 816–822. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02162.x
20.
MacDonaldG.LearyM. R. (2005). Why does social exclusion hurt? The relationship between social and physical pain. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 202–223. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.2.202
21.
MainM. (1990). Cross-cultural studies of attachment organization: Recent studies, changing methodologies, and the concept of conditional strategies. Human Development, 33, 48–61. doi:10.1159/000276502
22.
ManerJ. K.DeWallC. N.BaumeisterR. F.SchallerM. (2007). Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the 'porcupine problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 42–55. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.42
23.
MaxwellJ. A.SpielmannS. S.JoelS.MacDonaldG. (2013). Attachment theory as a framework for understanding responses to social exclusion. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 444–456. doi:10.1111/spc3.12037
24.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2003). The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 53–152). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(03)01002-5
25.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2011). Attachment, anger, and aggression. In ShaverP. R.MikulincerM. (Eds.), Human aggression and violence: Causes, manifestations, and consequences (pp. 241–257). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
26.
MoldenD. C.LucasG. M.GardnerW. L.DeanK.KnowlesM. L. (2009). Motivations for prevention or promotion following social exclusion: Being rejected versus being ignored. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 415–431. doi:10.1037/a0012958
27.
MoldenD. C.ManerJ. K. (2013). How and when social exclusion motivates social reconnection. In DewallC. N. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social exclusion (pp. 121–131). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
28.
MoskowitzD. S.HoM. R.Turcotte-TremblayA. (2007). Contextual influences on interpersonal complementarity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1051–1063. doi:10.1177/0146167207303024
29.
MurrayS. L.DerrickJ. L.LederS.HolmesJ. G. (2008). Balancing connectedness and self-protection goals in close relationships: A levels-of-processing perspective on risk regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 429–459. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.429
30.
NiederhofferK. G.PennebakerJ. W. (2002). Linguistic style matching in social interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21, 337–360. doi:10.1177/026192702237953
31.
OwenJ. E.Giese-DavisJ.CordovaM.KronenwetterC.GolantM.SpiegelD. (2006). Self-report and linguistic indicators of emotional expression in narratives as predictors of adjustment to cancer. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29, 335–345. doi:10.1007/s10865-006-9061-8
32.
PéloquinK.LafontaineM.BrassardA. (2011). A dyadic approach to the study of romantic attachment, dyadic empathy, and psychological partner aggression. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28, 915–942. doi:10.1177/0265407510397988
33.
PennebakerJ. W.FrancisM. E.BoothR. J. (2001). Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC2001. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Publishers.
34.
PennebakerJ. W.KingL. A. (1999). Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1296–1312. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1296
35.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/ BRM.40.3.879
36.
RogersR. W.Prentice-DunnS. (1981). Deindividuation and anger-mediated interracial aggression: Unmasking regressive racism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 63–73. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.1.63
37.
SedikidesC.CampbellW. K.ReederG. D.ElliotA. J. (1999). The relationship closeness induction task. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 23, 1–4.
38.
ShaverP. R.MikulincerM. (2002). Attachment-related psychodynamics. Attachment and Human Development, 4, 133–161. doi:10.1080/14616730210154171
39.
Smart RichmanL.LearyM. R. (2009). Reactions to discrimination, stigmatization, ostracism, and other forms of interpersonal rejection: A multimotive model. Psychological Review, 116, 365–383. doi:10.1037/a0015250
40.
SommerK. L.BenkendorfD. (2009). Looking before leaping: The role of social expectancies in attachment regulation following interpersonal rejection. In HarrisM. J. (Ed.), Bullying, rejection, and peer victimization: A social cognitive neuroscience perspective (pp. 225–250). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
41.
Tickle-DegnenL.RosenthalR. (1987). Group rapport and nonverbal behavior. In ClydeH. (Ed.) Group processes and intergroup relations. Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 9., pp. 113–136). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
TwengeJ. M.BaumeisterR. F.TiceD. M.StuckeT. S. (2001). If you can’t join them, beat them: Effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1058–1069. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1058
43.
TwengeJ. M.CantoneseK. R.BaumeisterR. F. (2003). Social exclusion and the deconstructed state: Time perception, meaninglessness, lethargy, lack of emotion, and self-awareness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 409–423. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.409
44.
TwengeJ. M.ZhangL.CataneseK. R.Dolan-PascoeB.LycheL. F.BaumeisterR. F. (2007). Replenishing connectedness: Reminders of social activity reduce aggression after social exclusion. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 205–224. doi:10.1348/014466605X90793
45.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
46.
WilliamsK. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425–452. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085641
47.
WilliamsK. D. (2009). Ostracism: A temporal need-threat model. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 41, pp. 279–314). New York, NY: Academic Press.
48.
WilliamsK. D.CheungC. K. T.ChoiW. (2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 748–762. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.748
