Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Happy faces are categorized faster as “happy” than angry faces as “angry,” the happy face advantage. Here, we show across three experiments that the size of the happy face advantage for male Caucasian faces varies as a function of the other faces they are presented with. A happy face advantage was present if the male Caucasian faces were presented among male African American faces, but absent if the same faces were presented among female faces, Caucasian or African American. The modulation of the happy face advantage for male Caucasian faces was observed even if the female Caucasian/male African American faces had neutral expressions. This difference in the happy face advantage for a constant set of faces as a function of the other faces presented indicates that it does not reflect on a stimulus-dependent bottom-up process but on the evaluation of the expressive faces within a specific context.

Keywords

emotional expressions happy face advantage emotion categorization face processing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aguado

Garcia-Gutierrez

Serrano-Pedraza

(2009). Symmetrical interaction of sex and expression in face classification tasks. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 71, 9–25. doi:10.3758/APP.71.1.9

Beaupré

M. G.

Hess

(2005). Cross-cultural emotion recognition among Canadian ethnic groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 355–370. doi:10.1177/0022022104273656

Becker

D. V.

Anderson

U. S.

Mortensen

C. R.

Neufeld

S. L.

Neel

(2011). The face in the crowd effect unconfounded: Happy faces, not angry faces, are more efficiently detected in single- and multiple-target visual search tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 637–659. doi:10.1037/a0024060

Becker

D. V.

Kenrick

D. T.

Neuberg

S. L.

Blackwell

K. C.

Smith

D. M.

(2007). The confounded nature of angry men and happy women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 179–190. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.179

Bijlstra

Holland

R. W.

Wigboldus

D. H. J.

(2010). The social face of emotion recognition: Evaluations versus stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 657–663. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010

Calvo

M. G.

Nummenmaa

(2008). Detection of emotional faces: Salient physical features guide effective visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 471–494. doi:10.1037/a0012771

Cottrell

C. A.

Neuberg

S. L.

(2005). Different emotional reactions to different groups: A socio-functional threat-based approach to “prejudice”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 770–789. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.770

Craig

B. M.

Mallan

K. M.

Lipp

O. V.

(2012). The effect of poser race on the happy categorization advantage depends on stimulus type, set size, and presentation duration. Emotion, 12, 1303–1314. doi:10.1037/a0028622

Eagly

A. H.

Kite

M. E.

(1987). Are stereotypes of nationalities applied to both women and men? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 451–462.

10.

Farell

(1988). Comparison requirements and attention in identical-nonidentical stimulus discriminations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 707–715.

11.

Forster

K. I.

Forster

J. C.

(2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 35, 116–124. doi:10.3758/BF03195503

12.

Hess

Adams

R. B.

Jr Grammer

Kleck

R. E.

(2009). Face gender and emotion expression: Are angry women more like men? Journal of Vision, 9, 1–8. doi:10.1167/9.12.19

13.

Hugdahl

Iversen

P. M.

Johnsen

B. H.

(1993). Laterality for facial expressions: Does the sex of subjects interact with the sex of the stimulus face? Cortex, 29, 325–331.

14.

Hugenberg

(2005). Social categorization and the perception of facial affect: Target race moderates the response latency advantage for happy faces. Emotion, 5, 267–276. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.267

15.

Hugenberg

Sczesny

(2006). On wonderful women and seeing smiles: Social categorization moderates the happy face response latency advantage. Social Cognition, 24, 516–539. doi:10.1521/soco.2006.24.5.516

16.

Leppänen

J. M.

Hietanen

J. K.

(2003). Affect and face perception: Odors modulate the recognition advantage of happy faces. Emotion, 3, 315–326. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.3.4.315

17.

Meissner

C. A.

Brigham

J. C.

(2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 3–35. doi:10.1037//1076-8971.7.1.3

18.

Navarrete

C. D.

Olsson

A. K.

Mendes

W. B.

Thomsen

Sidanius

(2009). Fear extinction to an out-group face: The role of target gender. Psychological Science, 20, 155–158. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02273.x

19.

Öhman

(2009). Of snakes and faces: An evolutionary perspective on the psychology of fear. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50, 543–552. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00784.x

20.

Purkis

H. M.

Lipp

O. V.

Edwards

M. E.

Barnes

(2009). An increase in stimulus arousal has differential effects on the processing speed of pleasant and unpleasant stimuli. Motivation and Emotion, 33, 353–361. doi:10.1007/s11031-009-9144-2

21.

Righart

de Gelder

(2008). Rapid influence of emotional scenes on encoding of facial expressions: an ERP study. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3, 270–278. doi:10.1093/scan/nsn021

22.

Robinson

M. D.

Storbeck

Meier

B. P.

Kirkeby

B. S.

(2004). Watch out! That could be dangerous: Valence-arousal interactions in evaluative processing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1472–1484. doi:10.1177/0146167204266647

23.

Rowles

M. E.

Lipp

O. V.

Mallan

K. M.

(2012). On the resistance to extinction of fear conditioned to angry faces. Psychophysiology, 49, 375–380. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01308.x

24.

Tottenham

Tanaka

J. W.

Leon

A. C.

McCarry

Nurse

Hare

T. A.

Nelson

(2009). The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Research, 168, 242–249. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2008.05.006

25.

Wallis

Lipp

O. V.

Vanman

E. J.

(2012). Face age and sex modulate the other-race effect in face recognition. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1712–1721. doi:10.3758/s13414-012-0359-z

26.

Wieser

M. J.

Brosch

(2012). Faces in context: A review and systematization of contextual influences on affective face processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 471. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00471

27.

Zarate

M. A.

Smith

E. R.

(1990). Person categorization and stereotyping. Social Cognition, 8, 161–185. doi:10.1521/soco.1990.8.2.161

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.25 MB

0.00 MB

A Happy Face Advantage With Male Caucasian Faces

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material