Perceivers use gender-atypical nonverbal cues to categorize others as lesbian/gay, and the same cues help to explain the occurrence of antigay prejudice. Although these patterns replicate across recent studies, their proximal causes have received little attention. It remains unclear, for example, why the gender-atypical appearances common among sexual minority individuals arouse negative evaluations. Here, we tested whether perceptions of communicative intent—believing that targets’ visible features are deliberately enacted in order to convey aspects of their identities—may help to explain observed links between sexual orientation categorization, gender typicality, and prejudice. In Study 1, gender-atypical body motions were associated with the perception that targets were intentionally trying to communicate their identity, and perceptions of communicative intent predicted expressions of antigay prejudice. Study 2 replicated these effects with static facial images. Collectively, these findings highlight communicative intent as an important factor predicting antigay prejudice in the early moments of social perception.
AllenV. L.AtkinsonM. L. (1981). Identification of spontaneous and deliberate behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 5, 224–237.
2.
AmbadyN.HallahanM.ConnerB.1999. Judgmetns of sexual orientation from thin slices of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 538–547.
3.
AndersonN. H. (1968). Likeableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 272–279.
4.
BarghJ. A. (1999). The cognitive monster: The case against controllability of automatic stereotype effects. In ChaikenS.TropeY. (Eds.), Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology (pp. 361–382). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
5.
BauerD. J.PreacherK. J.GilK. M. (2006). Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 11, 142–163.
6.
BemS. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk as a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.
8.
BussD. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evoluationary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–14.
9.
ColeS. W.KemenyM. E.TaylorS. E.VisscherB. R.FaheyJ. L. (1996). Accelerated course of human immunodeficiency virus infection in gay men who conceal their homosexual identity. Psychosomatic Medicine, 58, 219–231.
10.
CorlissH. L.CochranS. D.MaysV. M. (2002). Reports of parental maltreatment during childhood in a United States population-based survey of homosexual, bisexual, and heterosexual adults. Child Abuse & Neglect, 26, 1165–1178.
11.
CranfordJ. A.ShroutP. E.IidaM.RafaeliE.YipT.BolgerN. (2006). A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: Can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 917–929.
12.
DevineP. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18.
13.
FagotB. I. (1977). Consequences of moderate cross-gender behavior in preschool children. Child Development, 48, 902–907.
14.
FazioR. H.DuntonB. C. (1997). Categorization by race: The impact of automatic and controlled components of racial prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 451–470.
15.
FeinmanS. (1981). Why is cross-sex-role behavior more approved for girls than for boys?A status characteristic approach. Sex Roles, 7, 289–300.
16.
FreemanJ. B.JohnsonK. L.AmbadyN.RuleN. O. (2010). Sexual orientation perception involves gendered facial cues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1318–1331.
17.
GilbertD. T.HixonJ. G. (1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 509–517.
18.
GrantP. R.HolmesJ. G. (1981). The integration of implicit personality theory schemas and stereotype images. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 107–115.
19.
HaslamN.LevyS. R. (2006). Essentialist beliefs about homosexuality: Structure and implications for prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 471–485.
20.
HayesA. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analyses in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420.
21.
HerekG. M.JobeJ. B.CarneyR. M.1996. Out in force: Sexual orientation and the military. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22.
HornS. S. (2007). Adolescents’ acceptance of same-sex peers based on sexual orientation and gender expression. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 363–371.
23.
JayaratneT. E.YbarraO.SheldonJ. P.BrownT. N.FeldbaumM.PfefferC. A.PettyE. M. (2006). White Americans’ genetic lay theories of race differences and sexual orientation: Their relationship with prejudice toward blacks, and gay men and lesbians. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 9, 77–94.
24.
JohnsonK. L.GhavamiN. (2011). At the crossroads of conspicuous and concealable: What race categories communicate about sexual orientation. PLoS ONE, 6, e18025.
25.
JohnsonK. L.GillS.ReichmanV.TassinaryL. G. (2007). Swagger, sway, and sexuality: Judging sexual orientation from body motion and morphology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 321–334.
26.
JonesE. E.FarinaA.HastorfA. H.MarkusH.MillerD. T.ScottR. A. (1984). Social stigma: The psychology of marked relationships. New York, NY: Freeman.
27.
LandoltM. A.BartholomewK.SaffreyC.OramD.PerlmanD. (2004). Gender nonconformity, childhood rejection, and adult attachment: A study of gay men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 117–128.
28.
LickD. J.DursoL. E.JohnsonK. L. (2013). Minority stress and physical health among sexual minorities. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 521–548.
29.
LickD. J.JohnsonK. L. (2013). Fluency of visual processing explains prejudiced evaluations of minority targets. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 419–425.
30.
LickD. J.JohnsonK. L. (in press-a). Perceptual underpinnings of antigay prejudice: Negative evaluations of sexual minority targets arise early in person perception on the basis of visibly gendered features. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
31.
LickD. J.JohnsonK. L. (in press-b). Recalibrating gender perception: Face aftereffects and the perceptual underpinnings of gender-related biases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
32.
LickD. J.JohnsonK. L.GillS. V. (2013). Deliberate changes to gendered body motion influence basic social perceptions. Social Cognition, 31, 657–672.
33.
LoJ.HealyT. (2000). Flagrantly flaunting it? Contesting perceptions of local identity among urban Vancouver lesbians. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 4, 29–44.
34.
ManusovV.RodriguezJ. S. (1989). Intentionality behind nonverbal messages: A perceiver’s perspective. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 13, 15–21.
35.
PachankisJ. E. (2007). The psychological implications of concealing a stigma: A cognitive-affective-behavioral model. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 328–345.
36.
PloderlM.FartacekR. (2009). Childhood gender nonconformity and harassment as predictors of suicidality among gay, lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual Austrians. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 400–410.
37.
RaginsB. R.SinghR.CornwellJ. M. (2007). Making the invisible visible: Fear and disclosure of sexual orientation at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1103–1118.
38.
RuleN. O.AmbadyN. (2008). Brief exposures: Male sexual orientation is accurately perceived at 50 ms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1100–1105.
39.
RuleN. O.AmbadyN.AdamsR. B.JrMacraeC. N. (2008). Accuracy and awareness in the perception and categorization of male sexual orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1019–1028.
40.
RuleN. O.AmbadyN.HallettK. C. (2009). Female sexual orientation is perceived accurately, rapidly, and automatically from the face and its features. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1245–1251.
41.
SandnabbaN. K.AhlbergC. (1999). Parents’ attitudes and expectations about children’s cross-gender behavior. Sex Roles, 40, 249–263.
42.
SinclairL.KundaZ. (1999). Reactions to a black professional: Motivated inhibition and activation of conflicting stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 885–904.
43.
SternC.WestT. V.JostJ. T.RuleN. O. (2013). The politics of gaydar: Ideological differences in the use of gendered cues in categorizing sexual orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 520–541.
44.
ThompsonE. M.SinclairK. O.WilchinsR.RussellS. T. (2013). It's how you look or what you like: Gender harassment at school and its association with student adjustment. In R. Brooks, M. McCormack, & K. Bhopal (Eds.), Contemporary Debates in the Sociology of Education, (pp 149–167). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
45.
TskhayK. O.RuleN. O. (2013). Accuracy in categorizing perceptually ambiguous groups: A review an meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychological Review, 17, 72–86.
46.
ZhaoX.LynchJ. G.JrChenQ. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 197–206.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
