Recent psychological models of religion suggest that religious beliefs provide a form of psychological control. Independently, other research has found that an increase in psychological control can lead people to adopt riskier strategies. Hence, we hypothesized that activation of God concepts increases risk taking. In three studies, we found that God primes led to take greater risk taking as though participants were literally “taking a leap of faith.” In Study 2, we presented evidence that this effect could be mediated by increased psychological control. Although consistent with psychological models of religion, the findings also contradict some survey findings that religious people are less risk seeking. This inconsistency was addressed in Study 3 by looking at how religion, morality, and risk taking are related. Implications to a relational schema approach to study the effects of God primes are discussed.
AbarB.CarterK. L.WinslerA. (2009). The effects of maternal parenting style and religious commitment on self-regulation, academic achievement, and risk behavior among African-American parochial college students. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 259–273. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.03.008
2.
AklinW. M.LejuezC. W.ZvolenskyM. J.KahlercC. W.GwadzdM. (2005). Evaluation of behavioural measures of risk taking propensity with inner city adolescents. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 215–228. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2003.12.007
3.
AndersonC.GalinskyA.D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511–536. doi:10.1002/ejsp.324
4.
AtranS. (2002). In gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
5.
BaldwinM. W. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of information. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 461–484. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.3.461
6.
BaldwinM. W.CarrellS. E.LopezD. F. (1990). Priming relationship schemas: My advisor and the Pope are watching me from the back of my mind. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 435–454. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(90)90068-W
7.
BarghJ. A.ChartrandT. L. (2000). The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In ReisH. T.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 253–285), New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BatsonC. D.StocksE. L. (2004). Religion: Its core psychological functions. In GreenbergJ.KooleS. L.PyszczynskiT. (Eds.), Handbook of experimental existential psychology (pp. 141–155). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
9.
BergerP. L. (1967/1990). The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. New York, NY: Anchor Press.
10.
BirgegardA.GranqvistP. (2004). The correspondence between attachment to parents and God: Three experiments using subliminal separation cues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1122–1135. doi:10.1177/0146167204264266
11.
BushmanB. J.RidgeR. D.DasE.KeyC. W.BusathG. L. (2007). When God sanctions killing: Effect of scriptural violence on aggression. Psychological Science, 18, 204–207. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01873.x
12.
CarpenterT. P.MarshallM. A. (2009). An examination of religious priming and intrinsic religious motivation in the moral hypocrisy paradigm. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48, 386–393. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01454.x
13.
ChasteenA. L.BurdzyD. C.PrattJ. (2010). Thinking of God moves attention. Neuropsychologia, 48, 627–630. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.029
14.
DarleyJ.BatsonC. D. (1973). From Jerusalem to Jericho: A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 100–108. doi:10.1037/h0034449
15.
DavisD.SundahlI.LesboM. (2000). Illusory personal control as a determinant of bet size and type in casino craps games. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 1224–1242. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02518.x
16.
DiazJ. D. (2000). Religion and gambling in sin city: A statistical analysis of the relationship between religion and gambling patterns in Las Vegas residents. Social Science Journal, 37, 453–458. doi:10.1016/S0362-3319(00)00083-5
17.
DiClementeR. J.HansenW. B.PontonL. E., (Eds.). (1996). Handbook of adolescent health risk behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
18.
DijksterhuisA.PrestonJ.WegnerD. M.AartsH. (2008). Effects of subliminal priming of self and God on self-attribution of authorship for events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 2–9. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.01.003
19.
FeenyB. C.CollinsN. L. (2004). Interpersonal safe haven and secure base caregiving processes. In SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S. (Eds.), Adult attachment: Theory, research, and clinical application (pp. 300–338). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
20.
FreudS. (1927). The future of an illusion. London, England: Hogarth Press.
21.
GlucklichA. (2000). Sacred pain: Hurting the body for the sake of the soul. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22.
GorsuchR. L.McPhersonS. E. (1989). Intrinsic/extrinsic measurement: I/E-revised and single-item scales. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28, 348–354. doi:10.2307/1386745
23.
GranqvistP.MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2010). Religion as attachment: Normative processes and individual differences. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 49–59. doi:10.1177/1088868309348618
24.
HorswillM. S.McKennaF. P. (1999). The effect of perceived control on risk taking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 377–391. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb01392.x
25.
InzlichtM.TullettA. M. (2010). Reflecting on God: Religious primes can reduce neurophysiological response to errors. Psychological Science, 21, 1184–1190. doi:10.1177/0956797610375451
26.
KayA. C.GaucherD.McGregorI.NashK. (2010). Religious belief as compensatory control. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 37–48. doi:10.1177/1088868309353750
27.
KayA. C.GaucherD.NapierJ. L.CallanM. J.LaurinK. (2008). God and the government: Testing a compensatory control mechanism for the support of external systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 18–35. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.18
28.
KayA. C.WhitsonJ. A.GaucherD.GalinskyA. D. (2009). Compensatory control: Achieving order through the mind, our institutions, and the Heavens. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 264–268. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01649.x
29.
KerestesM.YounissJ.MetzE. (2004). Longitudinal patterns of religious perspective and civic integration. Applied Developmental Science, 8, 39–46. doi:10.1207/S1532480XADS0801_5
30.
KirkpatrickL. A. (1999). Attachment and religious representations and behavior. In CassidyJ.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 803–822). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
31.
KrayL. J.PaddockE. L.GalinskyA. D. (2008). The effect of past performance on expected control and risk attitudes in integrative negotiations. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 1, 161–178. doi:10.1111/j.1750-4716.2008.00009.x
32.
LangerE. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311–328. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.311
33.
LaurinK.KayA. C.FitzsimonsG. M. (2012). Divergent effects of activating thoughts of God on self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 4–21. doi:10.1037/a0025971
34.
LejuezC. W.AklinW. M.ZvolenskyM. J.PedullaC. M. (2003). Evaluation of Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) as a predictor of adolescent real-world risk-taking behaviors. Journal of Adolescence, 26, 475–479. doi:10.1016/S0140-1971(03)00036-8
35.
LejuezC. W.ReadJ. P.KahlerC. W.RichardsJ. B.RamseyS. EStuartG. L.BrownR. A. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 75–84. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.8.2.75
36.
LeungK.BondM. H. (2004). Social axioms: A model for social beliefs in multi-cultural perspective. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 119–197. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(04)36003-X
37.
LevensonH. (1981). Differentiating among internality, powerful others and chance. In LefcourtH. M. (Ed.), Research with the locus of control construct (Vol. 1, pp. 15–63). London, United Kingdom: Academic Press.
MalinowskyB. (1948). Magic, science and religion and other essays. New York, NY: Doubleday.
40.
McCulloughM. E.WilloughbyB. L. B. (2009). Religion, self-regulation, and self-control: Associations, explanations and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 69–93. doi:10.1037/a0014213
41.
McKayR.EffersonC.FehrE. (2010). Wrath of god: Priming and punishment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 1858–1863. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.2125
42.
MikulincerM.GillathO.HalevyV.AvihouN.AvidanS.EshkoliN. (2001). Attachment theory and reactions to others’ needs: Evidence that activation of the sense of attachment security promotes empathic responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1205–1224. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.81.6.1205
43.
MurrayK. M.CiarrocchiJ. W.Murray-SwankN. A. (2007). Spirituality, religiosity, shame and guilt as predictors of sexual attitudes and experiences. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 35, 222–234.
44.
NordgrenL. F.van der PligtJ.van HarreveldF. (2007). Unpacking perceived control in risk perception: The mediating role of anticipated regret. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20, 533–544. doi:10.1002/bdm.565
45.
NuttalJ.NuttalA. (2009). The mountains of England and Wales (3rd ed., Vol. 1). Cumbria, UK: Cicerone.
46.
PoulsonR. L.EpplerM. A.SatterwhiteT. N.WuenschK. L.BassL. A. (1998). Alcohol consumption, strength of religious beliefs, and risky sexual behavior in college students. Journal of American College Health, 46, 227–232. doi:10.1080/07448489809600227
47.
Randolph-SengB.NielsenM. E. (2007). Honesty: One effect of primed religious representations. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17, 303–315. doi:10.1080/10508610701572812
48.
ReynoldsB.OrtengrenA.RichardsJ. B.de WitH. (2006). Dimensions of impulsive behavior: Personality and behavioral measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 305–315. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.03.024
49.
RotterJ. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies of internal versus external control of reinforcements. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1–28.
SaroglouV.CorneilleO.Van CappellenP. (2009). “Speak, Lord, your servant is listening”: Religious priming activates submissive thoughts and behaviors. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 19, 143–54. doi:10.1080/10508610902880063
52.
SaroglouV.JaspardJ. -M. (2001). Does religion affect humour creation? An experimental study. Mental Health, Religion, and Culture, 4, 33–46. doi:10.1080/713685611
53.
ShariffA. F.NorenzayanA. (2007). God is watching you: Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18, 803–809. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01983.x
54.
SinhaJ. W.CnaanR. A.GellesR. W. (2007). Adolescent risk behaviors and religion: Findings from a national study. Journal of Adolescence, 30, 231–249. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.02.005
55.
SkinnerE. (1996). A guide to constructs of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 549–570. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.549
56.
SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P.FongG. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective in examining psychological process than mediational analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845–851. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845
57.
VictoroffJ.KruglanskiA. W. (2009). Psychology of terrorism: Classic and contemporary insights. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
58.
WallstenT. S.PleskacT. J.LejuezC. W. (2005). Modeling behavior in a clinically diagnostic sequential risk-taking task. Psychological Review, 112, 862–880. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.862
59.
WeberE. U.BlaisA.BetzN. E. (2006). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale for adult populations. Judgment and Decision Making, 1, 263–290. doi:10.1002/bdm.414
60.
Weisbuch-RemingtonM.MendesW. B.SeeryM. D.BlascovitchJ. (2005). The nonconscious influence of religious symbols in motivated performance situations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1203–1216. doi:10.1177/0146167205274448
61.
WestW. (2000). Psychotherapy and spirituality: Crossing the line between therapy and religion. London, UK: Sage.
62.
YatesJ. F.StoneE. R. (1992). The risk construct. In YatesJ. F. (Ed.), Risk-taking behavior (pp. 1–26). New York, NY: John Wiley.
