Casual sex has become a normative experience among young people, raising concerns regarding its well-being consequences. Prior findings on main effects of casual sex on well-being are mixed, suggesting possible moderating factors. Using longitudinal and weekly diary methodologies, this study examined the moderating influence of sociosexuality, a stable personality orientation toward casual sex, on psychological well-being (self-esteem, life satisfaction, depression, and anxiety) following penetrative (oral, vaginal, or anal) casual sex among single undergraduates. As predicted, sociosexuality moderated the effect of casual sex on well-being on a weekly basis across 12 consecutive weeks, over one semester, and over one academic year. Sociosexually unrestricted students typically reported higher well-being after having casual sex compared to not having casual sex; there were no such differences among restricted individuals. Few gender differences were found. Findings are discussed in terms of authenticity in one’s sexual behaviors.
AllisonR.RismanB. J. (2013). A double standard for “Hooking Up”: How far have we come toward gender equality?Social Science Research, 42, 1191–1206. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.04.006
2.
BaileyJ. M.KirkK. M.ZhuG.DunneM. P.MartinN. G. (2000). Do individual differences in sociosexuality represent genetic or environmentally contingent strategies? Evidence from the Australian twin registry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 537–545. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.78.3.537
3.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
4.
BaumeisterR. F.TwengeJ. M. (2002). Cultural suppression of female sexuality. Review of General Psychology, 6, 166–203. doi:10.1037//1089-2680.6.2.166
5.
BersaminM. M.ZamboangaB. L.SchwartzS. J.DonnellanM. B.HudsonM.WeisskirchR. S.CarawayS. J. (2014). Risky business: Is there an association between casual sex and mental health among emerging adults?Journal of Sex Research, 51, 43–51. doi:10.1080/00224499.2013.772088
6.
BussD. M.SchmittD. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.100.2.204
7.
CampbellA. (2008). The morning after and the night before. Human Nature, 19, 157–173. doi:10.1007/s12110-008-9036-2
8.
CooperM. L. (2002). Alcohol use and risky sexual behavior among college students and youth: Evaluating the evidence. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 101–117.
9.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
10.
de GraafH.SandfortT. G. M. (2004). Gender differences in affective responses to sexual rejection. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 395–403. doi:10.1023/B: ASEB.0000028892.63150.be
11.
Del GuidiceM. (2009). Sex, attachment, and the development of reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 1–21. doi:10.1017/S0140525X09000016
12.
DerogatisL. R. (1993). BSI: Administration, scoring and procedures manual (3rd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
13.
DiamondL. M.HuebnerD. M. (2012). Is good sex good for you? Rethinking sexuality and health. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 54–69. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00408.x
14.
EllisB. J.FigueredoA. J.BrumbachB. H.SchlomerG. L. (2009). Fundamental dimensions of environmental risk: The impact of harsh versus unpredictable environments on the evolution and development of life history strategies. Human Nature, 20, 204–268. doi:10.1007/s12110-009-9063-7
15.
FeldmanS. S.TurnerR. A.AraujoK. (1999). Interpersonal context as an influence on sexual timetables of youths: Gender and ethnic effects. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 9, 25–52. doi:10.1207/s15327795jra0901_2
16.
FielderR. L.CareyM. P. (2010a). Predictors and consequences of sexual “hookups” among college students: A short-term prospective study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1105–1119. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9448-4
17.
FielderR. L.CareyM. P. (2010b). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual hookups among first-semester female college students. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 36, 346–359. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2010.488118
18.
FielderR. L.WalshJ. L.CareyK. B.CareyM. P. (2014). Sexual hookups and adverse health outcomes: A longitudinal study of first-year college women. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 131–144. doi:10.1080/00224499.2013.848255
19.
GangestadS. W.SimpsonJ. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–644. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0000337X
20.
GarciaJ. R.ReiberC.MasseyS. G.MerriwetherA. M. (2012). Sexual hookup culture: A review. Review of General Psychology, 16, 161–176. doi:10.1037/a0027911
21.
GrelloC. M.WelshD. P.HarperM. S. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 255–267. doi:10.1080/00224490609552324
22.
GrelloC. M.WelshD. P.HarperM. S.DicksonJ. W. (2003). Dating and sexual relationship trajectories and adolescent functioning. Adolescent and Family Health, 3, 103–111.
23.
HigginsE. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94, 319–340. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319
24.
KernisM. H. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 1–26. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1401_01
25.
LevinR. J. (2007). Sexual activity, health and well-being: The beneficial roles of coitus and masturbation. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 22, 135–148. doi:10.1080/14681990601149197
26.
MonahanK. C.LeeJ. M. (2008). Adolescent sexual activity: Links between relational context and depressive symptoms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 917–927. doi:10.1007/s10964-007-9256-5
27.
OwenJ. J.FinchamF. (2011). Young adults’ emotional reactions after hooking up encounters. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 321–330. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9652-x
28.
OwenJ. J.FinchamF.MooreJ. (2011). Short-term prospective study of hooking up among college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 331–341. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9697-x
29.
OwenJ. J.QuirkK.FinchamF. (2013). Toward a more complete understanding of reactions to hooking up among college women. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. Advance publication ahead of print. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2012.751074
30.
OwenJ. J.RhoadesG. K.StanleyS. M.FinchamF. (2010). “Hooking up” among college students: Demographic and psychosocial correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 3, 103–111. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9414-1
31.
PaulE. L.WenzelA.HarveyJ. (2009). Hookups: A facilitator or a barrier to relationship initiation and intimacy development? In SprecherS.WenzelA.HarveyJ., (Eds.), Handbook of relationship initiation (pp. 375–390). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
32.
PavotW.DienerE. (1993). Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164–172. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4
33.
PenkeL.AsendorpfJ. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientation: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1113–1135. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113
34.
PetersenJ. L.HydeJ. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 21–38. doi:10.1037/a0017504
35.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S.CongdonR. (2010). HLM 7: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
36.
ReganP. C.DreyerC. S. (1999). Lust? Love? Status? Young adults’ motives for engaging in casual sex. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 11, 1–24. doi:10.1300/J056v11n01_01
37.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
Sandberg-ThomaS. E.Kamp DushC. M. (2014). Casual sexual relationships and mental health in adolescence and emerging adulthood. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 121–130. doi:10.1080/00224499.2013.821440
39.
SchmittD. P. (2005a). Is short-term mating the maladaptive result of insecure attachment? A test of competing evolutionary perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 747–768. doi:10.1177/0146167204271843
40.
SimpsonJ. A.GangestadS. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870–883. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.870
41.
SteppL. S. (2007). Unhooked: How young women pursue sex, delay love, and lose at both. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.
42.
TownsendJ. M.WassermanT. H. (2011). Sexual hookups among college students: Sex differences in emotional reactions. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40, 1173–1181. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9841-2
43.
VrangalovaZ. (In press). Hooking up and psychological wellbeing in college students: Short-term prospective links across different hookup definitions. Journal of Sex Research.
44.
VrangalovaZ. (2014). Does casual sex harm college students’ wellbeing? A longitudinal investigation of the role of motivation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, online ahead of print.doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0255-1
45.
WeaverS. J.HeroldE. S. (2000). Casual sex and women: Measurement and motivational issues. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 12, 23–41. doi:10.1300/J056v12n03_02
46.
WentlandJ. J.ReissingE. D. (2011). Taking casual sex not too casually: Exploring definitions of casual sexual relationships. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 20, 75–91.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
