Thought Calibration

Abstract

Previous research suggests that people draw inferences about their attitudes and preferences based on their own thoughtfulness. The current research explores how observing other individuals make decisions more or less thoughtfully can shape perceptions of those individuals and their decisions and ultimately impact observers’ willingness to be influenced by them. Three studies suggest that observing others make more (vs. less) thoughtful decisions generates more positive reactions when a choice is difficult but more negative reactions when a choice is easy. In essence, people perceive the quality of others’ decisions to be greater when other individuals engage in the right amount of thinking for the situation. These assessments then affect observers’ own decisions and openness to influence.

Keywords

thoughtfulness attitudes liking social influence decision difficulty

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ariely

Norton

M. I.

(2011). From thinking too little to thinking too much: A continuum of decision making. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2, 39–46.

Clary

E. G.

Tesser

(1983). Reactions to unexpected events: The naïve scientist and interpretive activity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 609–620.

Finkelman

Paul

. (1985). Slavery in the courtroom. An annotated bibliography of American cases. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, Illustrated. xxvii, 312 pp. Reprinted 1998 by The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd. LCCN 98-11284. ISBN 1-886363-48-X.

Hayes

A. F

. (2012). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Inbar

Botti

Hanko

(2011). Decision speed and choice regret: When haste feels like waste. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 533–540.

Johnson

M. A.

(1989). Variables associated with friendship in an adult population. Journal of Social Psychology, 129, 379–390.

Karmarkar

U. R.

Tormala

Z. L.

(2010). Believe me, I have no idea what I'm talking about: The effects of source certainty on consumer involvement and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 1033−1049.

Mayer

N. D.

Tormala

Z. L.

(2010). “Think” versus “feel” framing effects in persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 443–454.

Reich

Tormala

Z. L.

(2013). When contradictions foster persuasion: An attributionalperspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 426–439.

10.

Rucker

D. D.

Petty

R. E.

Briñol

(2008). What's in a frame anyway? A meta-cognitive analysis of the impact of one versus two sided message framing on attitude certainty. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18, 137–149.

11.

Sniezek

J. A.

Van Swol

L. M.

(2001). Trust, confidence, and expertise in a judge-advisor system. Organizational Behavior Human Decision Processes, 84, 288–307.

12.

Tetlock

P. E.

Kristel

Elson

Green

Lerner

(2000). The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 853–870.

13.

Tormala

Z. L.

Clarkson

J. J.

Henderson

M. D.

(2011). Does fast or slow evaluation foster greater certainty? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 422–434.

14.

Wakimoto

Fujihara

(2004). The correlation between intimacy and objective similarity in interpersonal relationships. Social Behavior and Personality, 32, 95–102.

15.

Zhang

Fitzsimons

(1999). Choice process satisfaction: The influence of attribute alignability and option limitation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77, 192–214.