Recent work demonstrates that harboring secrets influences perceptual judgments and actions. Individuals carrying secrets make judgments consistent with the experience of being weighed down, such as judging a hill as steeper and judging distances to be farther. In the present article, two studies examined whether revealing a secret would relieve the burden of secrecy. Relative to a control condition, thinking about a secret led to the judgments of increased hill slant, whereas revealing a secret eliminated that effect (Study 1). Additionally, relative to a control condition, thinking about a secret led to judgments of increased distance, and again, revealing a secret eliminated that effect (Study 2). Sharing secrets with others might relieve the perceived physical burden from secrecy.
BhallaM.ProffittD. R. (1999). Visual–motor recalibration in geographical slant perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1076–1096.
2.
BuhrmesterM. D.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.
3.
ColeS. W.KemenyM. E.TaylorS. E.VisscherB. R. (1996). Elevated physical health risk among gay men who conceal their homosexual identity. Health Psychology, 15, 243–251.
4.
DownsJ. S.HolbrookM. B.ShengS.CranorL. F. (2010). Are your participants gaming the system? Screening Mechanical Turk workers. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 2399–2402). New York, NY: ACM.
5.
FörsterJ.LibermanN. (2001). The role of attribution of motivation in producing post-suppressional rebound. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 377–390.
6.
FrijnsT.FinkenauerC. (2009). Longitudinal associations between keeping a secret and psychosocial adjustment in adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 33, 145–154.
7.
GilbertD. T.HixonJ. G. (1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 509–517.
8.
GoldD. B.WegnerD. M. (1995). The origins of ruminative thought: Trauma, incompleteness, nondisclosure, and suppression. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1245–1261.
9.
HortonJ. J.RandD. G.ZeckhauserR. J. (2011). The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics, 4, 399–425.
10.
IJzermanH.SeminG. R. (2009). The thermometer of social relations: Mapping social proximity on temperature. Psychological Science, 20, 1214–1220.
11.
JostmannN.LakensD.SchubertT. (2009). Weight as an embodiment of importance. Psychological Science, 20, 1169–1174.
12.
KellyA. E.YipJ. J. (2006). Is keeping a secret or being a secretive person linked to psychological symptoms?Journal of Personality, 74, 1349–1369.
13.
LaneJ. D.WegnerD. M. (1995). The cognitive consequences of secrecy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 237–253.
14.
LeeS. W. S.SchwarzN. (2010). Dirty hands and dirty mouths: Embodiment of the moral-purity metaphor is specific to the motor modality involved in moral transgression. Psychological Science, 21, 1423–1425.
15.
LeporeS. J.SmythJ. M. (2002). The writing cure: How expressive writing promotes health and emotional well-being. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16.
LibermanN.FörsterJ. (2000). Expression after suppression: A motivational explanation of post-suppressional rebound. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 190–203.
17.
MaasJ.WismeijerA. A. J.van AssenM. A. L. M.AquariusA. E. A. M. (2011). Is it bad to have secrets? Cognitive preoccupation as a toxic element of secrecy. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 12, 23–37.
18.
MartinL. L.TesserA. (1989). Toward a motivational and structural theory of ruminative thought. In UlemanJ. S.BarghJ. A. (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 306–326). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
19.
MeierB. P.SchnallS.SchwarzN.BarghJ. A. (2012). Embodiment in social psychology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 705–716.
20.
MillerG. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
21.
OppenheimerD. M.MeyvisT.DavidenkoN. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 867–872.
22.
PennebakerJ. W. (1989). Confession, inhibition, and disease. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 22, pp. 211–244). New York, NY: Academic Press.
23.
PennebakerJ. W. (1993). Putting stress into words: Health, linguistic, and therapeutic implications. Behavior Research and Therapy, 31, 539–548.
24.
PennebakerJ. W. (1997). Opening up: The healing power of expressing emotion. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
25.
PiazzaJ. R.BeringJ. M. (2010). The coevolution of secrecy and stigmatization. Human Nature, 21, 290–308.
26.
ProffittD. R. (2006). Embodied perception and the economy of action. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 110–122.
ProffittD. R.StefanucciJ.BantonT.EpsteinW. (2003). The role of effort in perceiving distance. Psychological Science, 14, 106–112.
30.
RodriguezR. R.KellyA. E. (2006). Health effects of disclosing personal secrets to imagined accepting versus non-accepting confidants. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25, 1023–1047.
31.
SchnallS.HarberK. D.StefanucciJ. K.ProffittD. R. (2008). Social support and the perception of geographical slant. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1246–1255.
32.
SchneiderI. K.RutjensB. T.JostmannN. B.LakensD. (2011). Weighty matters: Importance literally feels heavy. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 474–478.
33.
ShermanJ. W.LeeA. Y.BessenoffG. R.FrostL. A. (1998). Stereotype efficiency reconsidered: Encoding flexibility under cognitive load. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 589–606.
34.
SlepianM. L.MasicampoE. J.ToosiN. R.AmbadyN. (2012). The physical burdens of secrecy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 619–624.
35.
SlepianM. L.OikawaM.SmythJ. M. (in press). Suppressing thoughts of evaluation while being evaluated. Journal of Applied Social Psychology.
36.
SlepianM. L.RuleN. O.AmbadyN. (2012). Proprioception and person perception: Politicians and professors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1621–1628.
37.
SmythJ. M. (1998). Written emotional expression: Effect sizes, outcome types, and moderating variables. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 174–184.
38.
SparrowB.WegnerD. M. (2006). Unpriming: The deactivation of thoughts through expression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1009–1019.
39.
VangelistiA. (1994). Family secrets: Forms, functions, and correlates. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 113–135.
40.
VrijA.NunkoosingK.PatersonB.OosterwegelA.SoukaraS. (2002). Characteristics of secrets and the frequency, reasons and effects of secrets keeping and disclosure. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 56–70.
41.
WarrenF. (2006). My secret: A postsecret book. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
42.
WegnerD. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101, 34–52.
43.
WegnerD. M.ErberR.ZanakosS. (1993). Ironic processes in the mental control of mood and mood-related thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1093–1104.
44.
WegnerD. M.SchneiderD. J.KnutsonB.McMahonS. R. (1991). Polluting the stream of consciousness: The effect of thought suppression on the mind’s environment. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 15, 141–152.
45.
WegnerD. M.ZanakosS. (1994). Chronic thought suppression. Journal of Personality, 62, 615–640.
