Given the power of belonging needs to shape individuals’ thoughts, feelings, and behavior, we posited that people’s desire for reconnection even influences judgments of physical distance. We hypothesized that rejection motivates individuals to distance themselves from sources of rejection and draw near those who are accepting. We tested this hypothesis in five studies. Participants recalled someone who had rejected or accepted them previously (Study 1), tossed a ball with inclusive and exclusive confederates (Study 2), and relived a past rejection, acceptance, or failure in the presence of an uninvolved other (Studies 3–5). Participants provided retrospective estimates of distance to rejecting and accepting others (Studies 1–2) and to uninvolved others (Studies 3–5). Participants reported that (1) accepting others were closer than rejecting others and (2) uninvolved others were closer than nonsocial targets after rejection but not acceptance or failure. Findings suggest that individuals distort perceptions of distance to serve belonging needs.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
AinsworthM. D. S.BellS. M. (1970). Attachment, exploration, and separation: Illustrated by the behavior of one-year-olds in a strange situation. Child Development, 41, 49–67.
3.
BalcetisE.DunningD. (2010). Wishful seeing: More desired objects are seen as closer. Psychological Science, 21, 147–152. doi:10.1177/0956797609356283
4.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
5.
BowlbyJ. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. New York, NY: Basic Books.
6.
BrewerM. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482. doi:10.1177/0146167291175001
7.
BuckleyK. E.WinkelR. E.LearyM. R. (2004). Reactions to acceptance and rejection: Effects of level and sequence of relational evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 14–28. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00064-7
8.
CacioppoJ. T.PriesterJ. R.BerntsonG. G. (1993). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes: II. Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 5–17. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.5
9.
CameronJ. J.StinsonD. A.GaetzR.BalchenS. (2010). Acceptance is in the eye of the beholder: Self-esteem and motivated perceptions of acceptance from the opposite sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 513–529. doi:10.1037/a0018558
10.
CavalloJ. V.FitzsimonsG. M.HolmesJ. G. (2009). Taking chances in the face of threat: Romantic risk regulation and approach motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 737–751. doi:10.1177/0146167209332742
11.
DeWallC. N.ManerJ. K.RoubyD. A. (2009). Social exclusion and early-stage interpersonal perception: Selective attention to signs of acceptance following social exclusion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 729–741. doi:10.1037/a0014634
12.
DowneyG.FeldmanS. I. (1996). Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1327–1343. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.6.1327
13.
FörsterJ.StrackF. (1996). Influence of overt head movements on memory for valenced words: A case of conceptual-motor compatibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 421–430. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.421
14.
GableS. L.ReisH. T.ElliotA. J. (2000). Behavioral activation and inhibition in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1135–1149. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1135
15.
GardnerW. L.PickettC. L.BrewerM. B. (2000). Social exclusion and selective memory: How the need to belong influences memory for social events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 486–496. doi:10.1177/0146167200266007
16.
GardnerW. L.PickettC. L.KnowlesM. (2005). Social snacking and social shielding: Using social symbols, selves, and surrogates in the service of belonging needs. In WilliamsK.ForgasJ.von HippelW. (Eds.), The social out-cast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 227–241). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
17.
HollandR. W.RoederU.van BaarenR. B.BrandtA. C.HannoverB. (2004). Don’t stand so close to me: Then effects of self-construal on interpersonal closeness. Psychological Science, 15, 237–242. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00658.x
18.
KahnA.McGaugheyT. A. (1977). Distance and liking: When moving close produces increased liking. Sociometry, 40, 138–144.
19.
KnowlesM. L.GardnerW. L. (2008). Benefits of membership: The activation and amplification of group identities in response to social rejection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1200–1213. doi:10.1177/0146167208320062
20.
LaurenceauJ.TroyA. B.CarverC. S. (2005). Two distinct emotional experiences in romantic relationships: Effects of perceptions regarding approach of intimacy and avoidance of conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1123–1133. doi:10.1177/0146167205274447
21.
LearyM. R.KellyK. M.CottrellC. A.SchreindorferL. S. (2007). Individual differences in the need to belong: Mapping the nomological network. Unpublished manuscript, Duke University, Durham, NC.
22.
LoomisJ. M.Da SilvaJ. A.FujitaN.FukusimaS. S. (1992). Visual space perception and visually directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 906–921. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.906
23.
LucasG. M.KnowlesM. L.GardnerW. L.MoldenD. C.JefferisV. E. (2010). Increasing social engagement among lonely individuals: The role of acceptance cues and promotion motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1346–1359. doi:10.1177/0146167210382662
24.
ManerJ. K.DeWallC. N.BaumeisterR. F.SchallerM. (2007). Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the “porcupine problem.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 42–55. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.42
25.
ManerJ. K.MillerS. L.SchmidtN. B.EckelL. A. (2010). The endocrinology of exclusion: Rejection elicits motivationally tuned changes in progesterone. Psychological Science, 21, 581–588. doi:10.1177/0956797610362676
26.
MargucJ.Van KleefG. A.FörsterJ. (2012). Stepping back while staying engaged: When facing an obstacle increases psychological distance. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 379–386. doi:10.1177/1948550611423842
27.
MehrabianA. (1968). Relationship of attitude to seated posture, orientation, and distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 26–30. doi:10.1037/h0026384
28.
MurrayS. L.DerrickJ. L.LederS.HolmesJ. G. (2008). Balancing connectedness and self-protection goals in close relationships: A levels-of-processing perspective on risk regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 429–459. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.429
29.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.CollinsN. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 641–666. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.641
30.
PickettC. L.GardnerW. L.KnowlesM. L. (2004). Getting a cue: The need to belong and enhanced sensitivity to social cues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1095–1107. doi:10.1177/0146167203262085
31.
PowersK. E.HeathertonT. F. (2012). Characterizing socially avoidant and affiliative responses to social exclusion. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 6, 1–5. doi:10.3389/fnint.2012.00046
32.
ProffittD. R.StefanucciJ.BantonT.EpsteinW. (2003). The role of effort in perceiving distance. Psychological Science, 14, 106–112. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01427
33.
SchachterS. (1959). The psychology of affiliation: Experimental studies of the sources of gregariousness. Oxford, England: Stanford University Press.
34.
SchnallS.HarberK. D.StefanucciJ. K.ProffittD. R. (2008). Social support and the perception of geographical slant. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1246–1255. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.011
35.
SlepianM. L.YoungS. G.RuleN. O.WeisbuchM.AmbadyN. (2012). Embodied impression formation: Social judgments and motor cues to approach and avoidance. Social Cognition, 30, 232–240. doi:10.1521/soco.2012.30.2.232
36.
StefanucciJ. K.ProffittD. R. (2009). The roles of altitude and fear in the perception of height. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 424–438. doi:10.1037/a0013894
37.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
38.
WittJ. K.ProffittD. R.EpsteinW. (2004). Perceiving distance: A role of effort and intent. Perception, 33, 577–590. doi:10.1068/p5090
39.
WoodsA. J.PhilbeckJ. W.DanoffJ. V. (2009). The various perceptions of distance: An alternative view of how effort affects distance judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1104–1117. doi:10.1037/a0013622
40.
XiaoY. J.Van BavelJ. J. (2012). See your friends close and your enemies closer: Social identity threat shapes the representation of physical distance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 959–972. doi:10.1177/0146167212442228
41.
ZadroL.BolandC.RichardsonR. (2006). How long does it last? The persistence of the effects of ostracism in the socially anxious. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 692–697. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.10.007
