In two experimental studies, we used a moral self-evaluation implicit association task to investigate reactions to personal moral transgressions. In Study 1, negative self-evaluation was higher after participants had been blamed for being late to the experiment compared to a control condition. In Study 2, participants imagined committing either (a) a moral transgression or (b) no moral wrongdoing. In the transgression condition, negative self-evaluation was increased compared to the control condition. This effect was particularly pronounced among participants high in dispositional shame-proneness. Moreover, in the transgression condition, negative moral self-evaluation mediated the effect of shame-proneness on the preference for physical cleansing products. The present findings contribute to a better understanding of the cognitive and affective processes that underlie moral motivation.
AquinoK.ReedA. I. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440.
2.
BackM. D.SchmukleS. C.EgloffB. (2009). Predicting actual behavior from the explicit and implicit self-concept of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 533–548.
3.
BanduraA. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In KurtinesW. M.GewirtzJ. L (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development, Vol. 1: Theory; Vol. 2: Research; Vol. 3: Application (pp. 45–103). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
BanduraA. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26.
5.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
CookD. R. (1991). Shame, attachment, and addictions: Implications for family therapists. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, Addictions and the family, 13, 405–419.
7.
de HoogeI. E.ZeelenbergM.BreugelmansS. M. (2010). Restore and protect motivations following shame. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 111–127.
8.
De HouwerJ.Teige-MocigembaS.SpruytA.MoorsA. (2009). Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 347.
9.
DijksterhuisA. (2004). I like myself but I don’t know why: Enhancing implicit selfesteem by subliminal evaluative conditioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 345–355.
10.
FergusT. A.ValentinerD. P.McGrathP. B.JenciusS. (2010). Shame- and guilt-proneness: Relationships with anxiety disorder symptoms in a clinical sample. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24, 811–815.
11.
Giner-SorollaR. (2012). Judging passions moral emotions in persons and groups. Psychology Press.
12.
Giner-SorollaR.PiazzaJ.EspinosaP. (2011). What do the TOSCA guilt and shame scales really measure: Affect or action?Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 445–450.
13.
GrayN. S.BrownA. S.MacCullochM. J.SmithJ.SnowdenR. J. (2005). An implicit test of the associations between children and sex in pedophiles. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 304.
14.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464.
15.
GreenwaldA. G.NosekB. A.BanajiM. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.
16.
GrummM.NestlerS.von CollaniG. (2009). Changing explicit and implicit attitudes: The case of self-esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 327–335.
17.
HaidtJ.JosephC. (2008). The moral mind: How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. In CarruthersP.LaurenceS.StichS. (Eds.), The innate mind Volume 3: Foundations and the future, evolution and cognition (pp. 367–391). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
18.
HofmannW.BaumertA. (2010). Immediate affect as a basis for intuitive moral judgement: An adaptation of the affect misattribution procedure. Cognition & Emotion, 24, 522–535.
19.
KocherscheidtK.FiedlerP.KronmüllerK.-T.BackenstraßM.MundtC. (2002). Zur empirischen Unterscheidung von Scham und Schuld: Beschreibung und evaluierung der dt. Version des TOSCA. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 23, 217–224.
20.
KrohneH. W.EgloffB.KohlmannC.-W.TauschA. (1996). Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der “Positive and Negative Affect Schedule” (PANAS). Diagnostica, 42, 139–156.
21.
LewisH. B. (1971). Shame and guilt in neurosis. Psychoanalytic Review, 58, 419–438.
22.
LutwakN.PanishJ.FerrariJ. (2003). Shame and guilt: Characterological vs. behavioral self-blame and their relationship to fear of intimacy. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 909–916.
23.
NiedenthalP. M.TangneyJ. P.GavanskiI. (1994). “If only I weren’t” versus “If only I hadn’t”: Distinguishing shame and guilt in conterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 585–595.
24.
PeruginiM.LeoneL. (2009). Implicit self-concept and moral action. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 747–754.
25.
PinelesS. L.StreetA. E.KoenenK. C. (2006). The differential relationships of shame-proneness and guilt-proneness to psychological and somatization symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25, 688–704.
26.
PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D.HayesA. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227.
27.
RizviS. L. (2010). Development and preliminary validation of a new measure to assess shame: The shame inventory. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 32, 438–447.
28.
TangneyJ. P.DearingR. L.WagnerP.GramzowR. (2000). Test of self-conscious affect-3 (TOSCA-3). Fairfax, VA: George Maison University.
29.
TangneyJ. P.StuewigJ.MashekD. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345–372.
30.
TangneyJ. P.YoumanK.StuewigJ. (2009). Proneness to shame and proneness to guilt. In LearyM. R.HoyleR. H. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 192–209). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
31.
TracyJ. L.RobinsR. W. (2004). Putting the self into self-conscious emotions: A theoretical model. Psychological Inquiry, 15, 103–125.
32.
TracyJ. L.RobinsR. W. (2006). Appraisal antecedents of shame and guilt: Support for a theoretical model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1339–1351.
33.
UhlmannE.SwansonJ. (2004). Exposure to violent video games increases automatic aggressiveness. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 41–52.
34.
von CollaniG.HerzbergP. Y. (2003). Zur internen Struktur des globalen Selbstwertgefühls nach Rosenberg. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 24, 9–22.
35.
YiS.BaumgartnerH. (2011). Coping with guilt and shame in the impulse buying context. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 458–467.
36.
ZhongC.-B.LiljenquistK. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313, 1451–1452.
