We propose that dissent decisions involve a tension between shorter term group stability goals and longer term group change goals. Strongly identified members may be animated by either goal, and their behavior with respect to group norms is influenced by which is currently dominant. In two experiments, we manipulated construal level, a factor that affects goal selection, such that people are more likely to make decisions that further long-term goals at high (vs. low) construal level. As predicted, at high construal level, strong identifiers were more willing to dissent from group norms than weak identifiers; at low construal level, strong identifiers were equally or more conformist. These findings advance understanding of the motivational dynamics of dissent decisions and speak to the nature of depersonalization/self-categorization in groups. Identified members retained individual agency and exercised their own judgment regarding group norms, choosing to deviate when they perceived it to be in the group’s interest.
AbramsD.WetherellM.CochraneS.HoggM. A.TurnerJ. C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 97–119.
2.
BennettM.SaniF. (2008). Children’s subjective identification with social groups: A self-stereotyping approach. Developmental Science, 11, 69–75.
3.
BrewerM. B. (2008). Depersonalized trust and ingroup cooperation. In KruegerJ. I. (Ed.), Rationality and social responsibility (pp. 215–232). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
4.
BrewerM. B.KramerR. M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 543–549.
5.
BusheeB. J. (1998). The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. The Accounting Review, 73, 305–333.
6.
CampbellD. T. (1990). Asch’s moral epistemology for socially shared knowledge. In RockI. (Ed.), The legacy of Solomon Asch: Essays in cognition and social psychology (pp. 39–55). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
CookC. (2002). The contemporary presidency: The permanence of the “permanent campaign.”Presidential Studies Quarterly, 32, 753–764.
8.
CraneM. F.PlatowM. J. (2010). Deviance as adherence to injunctive group norms: The overlooked role of social identification in deviance. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 827–847.
9.
CrockerJ.LuhtanenR. (1990). Collective self-esteem and ingroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 60–67.
10.
De CremerD.van DijkE. (2002). Reactions to group success and failure as a function of identification level: A test of the goal-transformation hypothesis in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 435–442.
11.
De CremerD.van VugtM. (1999). Social identification effects in social dilemmas: A transformation of motives. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 871–893.
12.
EllemersN. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity management strategies. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 27–57.
13.
FlinR.SlavenG.StewartK. (1996). Emergency decision making in the offshore oil and gas industry. Human Factors, 38, 262–277.
14.
FreitasA. L.SaloveyP.LibermanN. (2001). Abstract and concrete self-evaluative goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 410–424.
15.
FujitaK.HanH. A. (2009). Moving beyond deliberative control of impulses: The effect of construal levels on evaluative associations in self-control conflicts. Psychological Science, 20, 799–804.
16.
FujitaK.TropeY.LibermanN.Levin-SagiM. (2006). Construal-levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 351–367.
17.
HoggM. A. (2000). Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 11, 223–255.
18.
JohnsonI. R.FujitaK. (2012). Change we can believe in: Using perceptions of changeability to promote system-change motives over system-justification motives in information search. Psychological Science, 23, 133–140.
19.
LeachC. W.van ZomerenM.ZebelS.VliekM. L. W.PennekampS. F.DoosjeB.OuwerkerkJ. W.SpearsR. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144–165.
20.
LibermanN.IdsonL. C.CamachoC. J.HigginsE. T. (1999). Promotion and prevention choices between stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1135–1145.
21.
LibermanN.TropeY. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 5905, 1201–1205.
22.
LibermanN.TropeY.StephanE. (2007). Psychological distance. In KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 353–381). New York, NY: Guilford.
23.
MalkocS. A.ZaubermanG.BettmanJ. R. (2010). Unstuck from the concrete: Carryover effects of abstract mindsets in intertemporal preferences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113, 112–126.
24.
McAuliffeB. J.JettenJ.HornseyM. J.HoggM. A. (2003). Individualist and collectivist norms: When it’s ok to go your own way. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 57–70.
25.
OnoratoR. S.TurnerJ. C. (2004). Fluidity in the self-concept: The shift from personal to social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 257–278.
26.
PackerD. J. (2008). On being both with us and against us: A normative conflict model of dissent in social groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 50–73.
27.
PackerD. J. (2009). Avoiding groupthink: Whereas weakly identified members remain silent, strongly identified members dissent about collective problems. Psychological Science, 20, 546–548.
28.
PackerD. J.ChasteenA. L. (2010). Loyal deviance: Testing the normative conflict model of dissent in social groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 5–18.
29.
PackerD. J.FujitaK.HermanS.(Under review). Rebels with a cause: A goal conflict approach to understanding when conscientious people dissent. Manuscript under review.
30.
RappaportA. (2005). The economics of short-term performance obsession. Financial Analysts Journal, 61, 65–79.
31.
ReicherS. D.HaslamS. A. (2006). Rethinking the psychology of tyranny: The BBC prison study. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 1–40.
32.
ReicherS. D.HaslamS. A.SmithJ. R. (2012). Working toward the experimenter: Reconceptualizing obedience within the Milgram paradigm as identification-based followership. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 315–324.
33.
ReicherS. D.SpearsR.PostmesT. (1995). A social identity model of deindividuation phenomena. European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 161–198.
34.
ScholerA. A.StroessnerS. J.HigginsE. T. (2008). Responding to negativity: How a risky tactic can serve a vigilant strategy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 767–774.
35.
ScholerA. A.ZouX.FujitaK.StroessnerS. J.HigginsE. T. (2010). When risk-seeking becomes a motivational necessity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 215–231.
36.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–48). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
37.
TauberS.SassenbergK. (2012). The impact of identification of adherence to group norms in team sports: Who is going the extra mile?Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 16, 231–240.
38.
TerryD. J.HoggM. A. (1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 776–795.
39.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization perspective. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
