Egocentric anchoring, that is, overimputing one’s own perspective onto others constitutes a major obstacle for successful perspective taking. Accordingly, differentiating between the self and others is beneficial for perspective taking because it highlights the inadequacy of egocentric anchoring. The current research tested whether activating avoidance motivational orientation enhances perspective-taking performance (compared to approach motivational orientation), because self-other differentiation is facilitated under avoidance orientation. Supporting these predictions, two experiments showed that inducing avoidance motivational orientation (compared to approach orientation) either via goal framing or via the respective arm position enhances perspective-taking performance. Using experimental causal chain design, Study 3a supported the hypothesis that avoidance motivational orientation fosters self-other differentiation, while Study 3b showed that fostering self-other differentiation experimentally enhanced perspective-taking performance. The findings are discussed with regard to the role of psychological distance in perspective taking.
AronA. U.AronE. N.SmollanD. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
2.
AronA.AronE. N.TudorM.NelsonG. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 241–253. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.241
3.
AronA. U.McLaughlin-VolpeT.MashekD.LewandowskiG.WrightS. C.AronE. N. (2004). Including others in the self. European Review of Social Psychology, 15, 101–103. doi:10.1080/10463280440000008
4.
BazermanM. H.NealeM. A. (1982). Improving negotiation effectiveness under final offer arbitration: The role of selection and training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 543–548. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.67.5.543
5.
BirchS. A. J.BloomP. (2004). Understanding children’s and adults’s limitations in mental state reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 255–260. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.04.011
6.
CacioppoJ. T.PriesterJ. R.BerntsonG. G. (1993). Rudimentary determinants if attitudes. II: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 5–17. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.5
7.
CarverC. S. (2001). Self-regulation. In TesserA.SchwarzN. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intraindividual processes (pp. 307–328). Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
8.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97, 19–35. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.19
9.
CoatsE. J.Janoff-BulmanR.AlpertN. (1996). Approach and avoidance goals: Differences in self-evaluation and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1057–1067. doi:10.1177/01461672962210009
10.
ConverseB. A.LinS.KeysarB.EpleyN. (2008). In the mood to get over yourself: Mood affects theory-of-mind use. Emotion, 8, 725–730. doi:10.1037/a0013283
11.
DavisM. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
12.
DecetyJ.SommervilleJ. A. (2003). Shared representations between the self and other: A social cognitive neuroscience view. TRENDS in Cognitive Science, 7, 527–533. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.004
13.
DijksterhuisA.van KnippenbergA. (1998). The relation between perception and behavior, or how to win a game of trivial pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 865–877. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.865
14.
EpleyN. (2008). Solving the (real) other-minds problem. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2/3, 1455–1474. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004-3008.00115.x
15.
EpleyN.CarusoE. M. (2009). Perspective taking: Misstepping into others’ shoes. In MarkmanK. D.KleinW. M. P.SuhrJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of imagination and mental simulation (pp. 295–309). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
16.
EpleyN.KeysarB.Van BovenL.GilovichT. (2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 327–339. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.327
17.
EpleyN.MorewedgeC. K.KeysarB. (2004). Perspective taking in children and adults: Equivalent egocentrism but differential correction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 760–768. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.002
18.
EpleyN.WaytzA. (2010). Mind perception. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, 5th ed., pp. 498–541). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
19.
FalkD. R.JohnsonD. W. (1977). The effects of perspective-taking and egocentrism on problem solving in heterogeneous and homogeneous groups. The Journal of Social Psychology, 102, 63–72.
20.
FayantM. P.MullerD.NurraD.AlexopoulosT.Palluel-GermainR. (2011). Moving forward is not only a metaphor: Approach and avoidance lead to self-evaluative assimilation and contrast. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 241–245. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2010.07.013
21.
FlavellJ. H. (1992). Perspectives on perspective taking. In BeilinH.PufallP. B. (Eds.), Piaget’s theory: Prospects and possibilities. The Jean Piaget symposium series (pp. 107–139). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
FlavellJ. H.BotkinP. T.FryC. L.JrWrightJ. W.JarvisP. E. (1968). The development of role-taking and communication skills in children (pp. 3–33). Oxford, England: John Wiley.
23.
FriedmanR. S.FörsterJ. (2000). The effects of approach and avoidance motor actions on the elements of creative insight. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 477–492. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.477
24.
FriedmanR. S.FörsterJ. (2002). The influence of approach and avoidance motor actions on creative cognition. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 41–55. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1488
25.
GalinskyA. D.MadduxW. W.GilinD.WhiteJ. B. (2008). Why it pays to get inside the head of your opponent. Psychological Science, 19, 378–384. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02096.x
26.
GalinskyA. D.MoskowitzG. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 708–724. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.708
27.
GalinskyA. D.WangC. S.KuG. (2005). Perspective taking and self-other overlap: Fostering social bonds and facilitating social coordination. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8, 109–124. doi:10.1177/1368430205051060
28.
GrayJ. A. (1990). Brain systems that mediate both emotion and cognition. Cognition and Emotion, 4, 269–288. doi:10.1080/02699939008410799
29.
HigginsE. T. (1980). Role-taking and social judgment: Alternative developmental perspectives and processes. In FlavellJ. H.RossL. (Eds.), New directions in the study of social-cognitive development (pp. 119–153). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
30.
HigginsE. T.RholesW. S.JonesC. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141–154. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(77)80007-3
31.
HochS. J. (1997). Perceived consensus and predictive accuracy: The pros and cons of projection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 221–234. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.2.221
32.
HodgesS. D.Biswas-DienerR. (2007). Balancing the empathy expense account: Strategies for regulating empathic response. In FarrowT.WoodruffP. (Eds.), Empathy in mental illness (pp. 389–407). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511543753.022
33.
HodgesS. D.KielK. J.KramerA. D. I.VeachD.VillanuevaB. R. (2010). Giving birth to empathy: The effects of similar experience on empathic accuracy, empathic concern, and perceived empathy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 398–409. doi:10.1177/0146167209350326
34.
IckesW. (1993). Empathic accuracy. Journal of Personality, 61, 587–610. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00783.x
35.
KelleyC. M. (1999). Subjective experience as a basis of “objective” judgments: Effects of past experience on judgments of difficulty. In GopherD.KoriatA. (Eds.), Attention and performance (Vol. 17, pp. 515–536). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36.
KeysarB. (1994). The illusory transparency of intention: Linguistic perspective taking in text. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 165–208. doi:10.1006/cogp.1994.1006
37.
KleinK. J. K.HodgesS. D. (2001). Gender, differences, motivation, and empathic accuracy: When it pays to understand. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 720–730. doi:10.1177/0146167201276007
38.
KrohneH. W.EgloffB.KohlmannC.-W.TauschA. (1996). Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der ’Positive and Negative Affect Schedule’ (PANAS) [Investigations with a German version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)]. Diagnostica, 42, 139–156.
39.
KühnenU.HannoverB. (2000). Assimilation and contrast in social comparisons as a consequence of self-construal activation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 799–811. doi:10.1002/1099-0992(200011/12)30:6<799::AID-EJSP16>3.0.CO;2-2
40.
LinS.KeysarB.EpleyN. (2010). Reflexively mindblind: Using theory-of-mind to interpret behavior requires effortful attention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 551–556. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.019
41.
LiviatanI.TropeY.LiebermanN. (2008). Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: Implications for perception of others’ actions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1256–1269. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.007
42.
MeadG. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago, IL: University Press.
43.
MussweilerT. (2006). Doing is for thinking! Stereotype activation by stereotypic movements. Psychological Science, 17, 17–21. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01659.x
44.
NickersonR. S. (1999). How we know—And sometimes misjudge—What others know: Imputing one’s own knowledge to others. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 737–759. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.737
45.
NussinsonR.SeibtB.HäfnerM.StrackF. (2010). Come a bit closer: Approach motor action leads to feeling similar and behavioral assimilation. Social Cognition, 28, 40–58. doi:10.1521/soco.2010.28.1.40
46.
PiagetJ. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. London, England: Paul Kegan.
47.
PrestonS. D.HofelichA. J. (2012). The many faces of empathy: Parsing empathic phenomena through a proximate, dynamic-systems view of representing the other in the self. Emotion Review, 4, 24–33. doi:10.1177/1754073911421378
48.
PrinzW. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129–154. doi:10.1080/713752551
49.
RoyzmanE. B.CassidyK. W.BaronJ. (2003). “I know, you know”: Epistemic egocentrism in children and adults. Review of General Psychology, 7, 32–47. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.38
50.
SchnelleJ.BrandstätterV.KnöpfelA. (2010). The adoption of approach and avoidance goals: The role of goal-relevant resources. Cognition and Emotion, 34, 215–229. doi:10.1007/s11031-010-9173-x
51.
SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P.FongG. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845–851. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845
52.
StephensonB.WicklundR. A. (1983). Self-directed attention and taking the other’s perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 58–77. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(83)90005-7
53.
StinsonL.IckesW. (1992). Empathic accuracy in the interactions of male friends versus male strangers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 787–797. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.5.787
54.
StrackF.MartinL. L.StepperS. (1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 768–777. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.768
55.
ToddA. R.BodenhausenG. V.RichesonJ. A.GalinskyA. D. (2011). Perspective taking combats automatic expressions of racial bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1027–1042. doi:10.1037/a0022308
56.
ToddA. R.HankoK.GalinskyA. D.MussweilerT. (2011). When focusing on differences leads to similar perspectives. Psychological Science, 22, 134–141. doi:10.1177/0956797610392929
57.
Van BovenL.KaneJ.McGrawA. P.DaleJ. (2010). Feeling close: Emotional intensity reduces perceived psychological distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 872–885. doi:10.1037/a0019262
58.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
59.
WilliamsL. E.BarghJ. A. (2008). Keeping one’s distance: The influence of spatial distance cues on affect and evaluation. Psychological Science, 19, 302–308. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02084.x
60.
ZhangF.ParmleyM. (2011). What your best friend sees that I don’t see: Comparing female close friends and casual acquaintances on the perception of emotional facial expressions of varying intensities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 28–39. doi:10.1177/0146167210388194
