True altruism involves sacrifice and is thus incompatible, in people’s minds, with benefits to the benefactor. Consistent with this prototype, selflessly motivated prosocial actors are perceived as less likely to benefit from their acts compared with selfishly motivated actors (“Nice guys finish last”), and prosocial actors who benefit are perceived as less benevolent than those who do not (“Guys in last are nice”)—even in situations for which benefits are randomly determined and completely out of the control of the actor. The studies present supportive evidence of the reflexive association between a pure, selfless motive and sacrifice with respect to both individuals and organizations.
AakerJ. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 347–357.
2.
AlickeM. D.DavisT. L. (1989). The role of a posteriori victim information in judgments of blame and sanction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 362–377.
3.
ArielyD.BrachaA.MeierS. (2009). Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially. American Economic Review, 99, 544–555.
4.
BaronJ.HersheyJ. C. (1988). Outcome bias in decision evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 569–579.
5.
CialdiniR. B.BrownS. L.LewisB. P.LuceC.NeubergS. L. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathy–altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 481–494.
6.
ConverseB. A.RisenJ. L.CarterT. J. (2012). Investing in karma: When wanting promotes helping, Psychological Science, 23, 923–930.
7.
DuS.BhattacharyaC. B.SenS. (2007). Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24, 224–241.
8.
FeinS.HiltonJ. L. (1994). Judging others in the shadow of suspicion. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 167–198.
9.
FlynnF. J. (2003). How much should I give and how often? The effects of generosity and frequency or favor exchange on social status and productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 539–553.
10.
FurnhamA. (2003). Belief in a just world: Research progress over the past decade. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 795–817.
11.
GrantA. M.GinoF. (2010). A little thanks goes a long way: Explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 946–955.
12.
HardyC. L.Van VugtM. (2006). Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1402–1413.
13.
InbarY.PizarroD. A.CushmanF. (2012). Benefiting from misfortune: when harmless actions are judged to be morally blameworthy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 52–62.
14.
JonesE. E.DavisK. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219–266). New York, NY: Academic Press.
15.
KnobeJ. (2003). Intentional action and side-effects in ordinary language. Analysis, 63, 190–193.
16.
KogutT.RitovI. (2011). ‘Protective donation’: When refusing a request for a donation increases the sense of vulnerability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1059–1069.
17.
LernerM. J.MillerD. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030–1051.
18.
Lin-HealyF.SmallD. A. (2012). Cheapened Altruism: Discounting personally affected prosocial actors. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 269–274.
19.
LipkusI. (1991). The construction and preliminary validation of a global belief in a just world scale and the exploratory analysis of the multidimensional belief in a just world scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 1171–1178.
20.
MaselliM. D.AltrocchiJ. (1969). Attribution of intent. Psychological Bulletin, 71, 445–454.
21.
OlivolaC. Y.ShafirE. (2013). The martyrdom effect: When pain and effort increase prosocial contributions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26, 91–105.
22.
PorterM. E.KramerM. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84, 78–92.
23.
PriceM. E. (2006). Monitoring, reputation, and ‘greenbeard’ reciprocity in a Shuar work team. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 201–209.
24.
RifonN. J.ChoiS. MTrimbleC. S.LiH. (2004). Congruence effects in sponsorship: The mediating role of sponsor credibility and consumer attributions of sponsor motive. Journal of Advertising, 33, 29–42.
25.
SenS.BhattacharyaC. B.KorschunD. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34, 158–166.
26.
ShaverK. G. (1985). The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
27.
StruthersC. W.EatonJ.SantelliA. G.UchiyamaM.ShirvaniN. (2008). The effects of attributions of intent and apology on forgiveness: When saying sorry may not help the story. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 44, 983–992.
