A body of research has demonstrated that people adopt a more interpersonally positive orientation as they age. The current study extends this line of research by examining how mate preferences shift as a function of age. Our worldwide sample rated their attraction to various photographs and completed self-report measures of attraction. Based on a revealed preference measure, the authors found that older individuals preferred people who displayed communal characteristics, and this pattern was fairly universal. On the other hand, self-reported preferences were less consistent. The authors’ findings suggest that, in addition to becoming more agreeable with age, people are drawn to others with similarly agreeable qualities. This universal pattern indicates that mate preferences across the life span shift largely toward increased preference for communal characteristics.
BerscheidE.WalsterE. (1974). Physical attractiveness. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 157-215). New York, NY: Academic Press.
2.
BishaiD.TrevittJ. L.ZhangY.McKenzieL. B.LeventhalT.GielenA. C.GuyerB. (2008). Risk factors for unintentional injuries in children: Are grandparents protective?Pediatrics, 122, 980-987.
3.
BussD. M.BarnesM. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 559-570.
4.
CarstensenL. L.IsaacowitzD. M.CharlesS. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165-181.
5.
CohenJ.CohenP. (1983). Multiple regression/correlation for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
EastwickP. W.FinkelE. J. (2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 245-264.
7.
EbnerN. C.JohnsonM. K. (2009). Young and older emotional faces: Are there age group differences in expression identification and memory?Emotion, 9, 329-339.
8.
FismanR.IyengarS.SimonsonI. (2004). Revealed preference determinants of mate selection: Evidence from an experimental dating market, Columbia University. Unpublished manuscript.
9.
GangestadS. W.ThornhillR. (1997). Human sexual selection and developmental stability. In SimpsonJ. A.KenrickD. T. (Eds.), Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 169-95). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. R. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528.
11.
HagestadG. O.NeugartenB. L. (1985). Age and the life course. In BinstockR. H.ShanasE. (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (2nd ed., pp. 35-61). New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
12.
HeineS.BuchtelE.NorenzayanA. (2008). What do cross-national comparisons of personality traits tell us? The case of conscientiousness. Psychological Science, 19, 309-313.
13.
HelsonR.KwanV. Y.JohnO. P.JonesC. (2002). The growing evidence for personality change in adulthood: Findings from research with personality inventories. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 287-306.
14.
KaplanH. S.GangestadS. W. (2005). Life history theory and evolutionary psychology. In BussD. M. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 68-95). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
15.
KenrickD. T.KeefeR. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 75-133.
16.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.Jr.Pedroso de LimaM.SimoesA.OstendorfF.AngleitnerA.… PiedmontR. L. (1999). Age differences in personality across the adult life span: Parallels in five cultures. Developmental Psychology, 35, 466-477.
17.
PaulhusD. L.JohnO. P. (1998). Egoistic and moralistic biases in self-perception: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality, 66, 1025-1060.
18.
PhillipsT.FergusonE.RijsdijkF. (2010). A link between altruism and sexual selection: Genetic influence on altruistic behaviour and mate preference towards it. British Journal of Psychology, 101, 809-819.
19.
PoulinM.Cohen SilverR. (2008). World benevolence beliefs and well-being across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 23, 13-23.
20.
RobertsB. W.CaspiA.MoffittT. (2003). Work experiences and personality development in young adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 582-593.
21.
RobertsB. W.WaltonK. E.ViechtbauerW. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1-25.
22.
RoffL.DurkinD.SunF.KlemmackD. L. (2007). Widowhood, religiousness, and self-assessed well-being among older adults. Journal of Religion, Spirituality and Aging, 19, 43-59.
23.
SandbergJ.HofferthS. (2001). Changes in children’s time with parents: United States, 1981–1997. Demography, 38, 423-436.
24.
SegalM. W. (1974). Alphabet and attraction: An unobtrusive measure of the effect of propinquity in a field setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 654-657.
25.
ShackelfordT. K.SchmittD. P.BussD. M. (2005). Mate preferences of married persons in the newlywed year and three years later. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 1262-1270.
26.
TruettK. R. (1993). Age differences in conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 405-411.
27.
UrryH. L.GrossJ. J. (2010). Emotion regulation in older age. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 352-357.
28.
VazireS. (2010). Who knows what about a person? The self-other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 281-300.
29.
WoodD. O.BrumbaughC. C. (2009). Using revealed mate preferences to evaluate market force and differential preference explanations for mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1226-1244.
30.
WoodD.GoslingS. D.PotterJ. (2007). Normality evaluations and their relation to personality traits and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 861-879.
31.
WoodD.RobertsB. W. (2006). The effect of age and role information on expectations for Big Five personality traits. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1482-1496.
32.
WoodD.RogersK. (2011). Regional differences in personality exist, but how do we get to them? The case of conscientiousness. American Psychologist, 66, 917-918.
33.
ZajoncR. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 1-27.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
