Life satisfaction (LS) is prospectively associated with the occurrence of several major events in work and family life. Analyzing longitudinal data from three nationally representative panel studies (Ns between 2,321 and 18,692), the authors found that higher LS is associated with a higher likelihood of marriage and childbirth, and with a lower likelihood of marital separation, job loss, starting a new job, and relocating. These effects held even after controlling for gender, age, socioeconomic status, and the Big Five, and were highly consistent across the three samples. Discrete-time survival analyses indicated that for most of these events, temporary rather than stable mechanisms account for the prospective effect of LS. Together, these findings provide evidence that LS is an important predictor of major life outcomes.
BrettJ. F.BriefA. P.BurkeM. J.GeorgeJ. M.WebsterJ. (1990). Negative affectivity and the reporting of stressful life events. Health Psychology, 9, 57–68. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.9.1.57
2.
Buck LouisG. M.LumK.SundaramR.ChenZ.KimS.LynchC. D.
…PyperC. (2011). Stress reduces conception probabilities across the fertile window: Evidence in support of relaxation. Fertility and Sterility, 95(7), 2184–2189.
3.
ClarkA. E.DienerE.GeorgellisY.LucasR. E. (2008). Lags and leads in life satisfaction: A test of the baseline hypothesis. Economic Journal, 118, F222–F243.
4.
DienerE.ChanM. Y. (2011). Happy people live longer: Subjective well-being contributes to health and longevity. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 3, 1–43. doi:10.1111/j.1758-0854.2010.01045.x
5.
DienerE.LucasR. E.ScollonC. N. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill—Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 61, 305–314. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.61.4.305
6.
DienerE.SuhE. M.LucasR. E.SmithH. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.
7.
EidM. (2008). Measuring the immeasurable: Psychometric modeling of subjective well-being data. In EidM.LarsenR. J. (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 141–167). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
8.
EidM.DienerE. (2004). Global judgments of subjective well-being: Situational variability and long-term stability. Social Indicators Research, 65, 245–277.
9.
FujitaF.DienerE. (2005). Life satisfaction set point: Stability and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 158–164. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.158
10.
GerlitzJ. Y.SchuppJ. (2005). Zur Erhebung der Big-Five-basierten Persönlichkeitsmerkmale im SOEP. [The assessment of Big Five-based personality factors in the SOEP]. Berlin, Germany: DIW Berlin.
11.
GrahamC.EggersA.SukhtankarS. (2004). Does happiness pay? An exploration based on panel data from Russia. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55, 319–342.
12.
GriffethR. W.HomP. W.GaertnerS. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26, 463–488. doi:10.1177/014920630002600305
13.
HeadeyB. (2006). Subjective well-being: Revisions to dynamic equilibrium theory using national panel data and panel regression methods. Social Indicators Research, 79, 369–403.
14.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138): New York, NY: Guilford Press.
15.
Koivumaa-HonkanenH.KoskenvuoM.HonkanenR. J.ViinamäkiH.HeikkiläK.KaprioJ. (2004). Life dissatisfaction and subsequent work disability in an 11-year follow-up. Psychological Medicine: A Journal of Research in Psychiatry and the Allied Sciences, 34, 221–228. doi:10.1017/s0033291703001089
16.
LucasR. E.ClarkA. E.GeorgellisY.DienerE. (2003). Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: Reactions to changes in marital status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 527–539. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.527
17.
LucasR. E.DonnellanM. B. (2007). How stable is happiness? Using the STARTS model to estimate the stability of life satisfaction. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1091–1098.
18.
LuhmannM.EidM. (2009). Does it really feel the same? Changes in life satisfaction following repeated life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 363–381.
19.
LuhmannM.HofmannW.EidM.LucasR. E. (2011). Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1037/a0025948
20.
LuhmannM.SchimmackU.EidM. (2011). Stability and variability in the relationship between subjective well-being and income. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 186–197. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2011.01.004
21.
LyubomirskyS.KingL.DienerE. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success?Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803–855. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803
22.
MagnusK.DienerE.FujitaF.PayotW. (1993). Extraversion and neuroticism as predictors fo objective life events: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1046–1053.
23.
MarksG. N.FlemingN. (1999). Influences and consequences of well-being among Australian young people: 1980–1995. Social Indicators Research, 46, 301–323.
24.
OishiS.DienerE.LucasR. E. (2007). The optimum level of well-being can people be too happy?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 346–360. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00048.x
25.
OkunM. A.StockW. A.HaringM. J.WitterR. A. (1984). The social activity/subjective well-being relation: A quantitative synthesis. Research on Aging, 6, 45–65. doi:10.1177/0164027584006001003
26.
RobertsB. W.KuncelN. R.ShinerR.CaspiA.GoldbergL. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 313–345.
27.
SaucierG. (1994). Mini-Markers: A brief version of Goldberg's unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506–516. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_8
28.
SaudinoK. J.PedersenN. L.LichtensteinP.McClearnG. E.PlominR. (1997). Can personality explain genetic influences on life events?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 196–206. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.196
29.
SeidlitzL.DienerE. (1993). Memory for positive versus negative life events: Theories for the differences between happy and unhappy persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 654–663.
30.
SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
31.
SpechtJ.EgloffB.SchmukleS. C. (2011). Stability and change of personality across the life course: The impact of age and major life events on mean-level and rank-order stability of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 862–882. doi:10.1037/a0024950
32.
SteelP.SchmidtJ.ShultzJ. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 138–161.
33.
SticeE.ShawH. E. (2002). Role of body dissatisfaction in the onset and maintenance of eating pathology: A synthesis of research findings. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 53, 985–993. doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(02)00488-9
34.
SzymanskiD. M.HenardD. H. (2001). Customer satisfaction: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29, 16–35. doi:10.1177/0092070301291002
35.
TaylorM. F.BriceJ.BuckN.Prentice-LaneE. (2009). British Household Panel Survey User Manual Volume A: Introduction, technical report and appendices. Colchester, England: University of Essex.
36.
WagnerG. G.FrickJ. R.SchuppJ. (2007). The German Socioeconomic Panel Study (SOEP). Scope, evolution and enhancements. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 127, 139–169.
37.
WoodenM.WatsonN. (2007). The HILDA Survey and its contribution to economic and social research (so far). Economic Record, 83, 208–231.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
