Who is more likely to behave aggressively? Is it someone outperformed by others or is it someone who outperformed others? For safety reasons, it is important to know the answer to this question. In Studies 1 and 2, participants were told that they did worse or better than an ostensible partner on a first task. Then they aggressed against this partner on a second task using loud, painful noise blasts. Results showed that participants aggressed more against someone they outperformed (the loser) than against someone who outperformed them (the winner). However, these results do not indicate whether participants were especially aggressive against someone they outperformed, or whether they were especially nonaggressive against someone who outperformed them. Study 3 included a control group and showed it was the former. These studies suggest that one should pay particular attention to winners rather than losers, because winners tend to aggress against losers.
AndersonC.GalinskyA. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511–536.
2.
AronsonE.WillermanB.FloydJ. (1966). The effect of a pratfall on increasing interpersonal attractiveness. Psychonomic Science, 4, 227–228.
3.
BerkowitzL. (1965). The concept of aggressive drive. Some additional considerations. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 301–329). New York, NY: Academic Press.
4.
BerkowitzL.FrodiA. (1979). Reactions to a child’s mistakes as affected by her/his looks and speech. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42, 420–425.
5.
BernsteinS.RichardsonD.HammockG. (1987). Convergent and discriminant validity of the Taylor and Buss measures of physical aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 13, 15–24.
6.
BushmanB. J.BaumeisterR. F. (1998). Threatened egotism, narcissism, self-esteem, and direct and displaced aggression: Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 219–229.
7.
BushmanB. J.BaumeisterR. F.PhillipsC. M. (2001). Do people aggress to improve their mood? Catharsis beliefs, affect regulation opportunity, and aggressive responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 17–32.
8.
BushmanB. J.BaumeisterR. F.ThomaesS.RyuE.BegeerS.WestS. G. (2009). Looking again, and harder, for a link between low self-esteem and aggression. Journal of Personality, 77, 427–446.
9.
CroizetJ.-C. (2008). The pernicious relationship between merit assessment and discrimination in education. In AdamsG.BiernatM.BranscombeN. R.CrandallC. S.WrightsmanL. S. (Eds.), Commemorating brown: The social psychology of racism and discrimination (pp. 153–172). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The ‘‘what’’ and ‘‘why’’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
11.
FastN. J.ChenS. (2009). When the boss feels inadequate: Power, incompetence, and aggression. Psychological Science, 20, 1406–1413.
12.
FastN.J.GruenfeldD.H,SivanathanN. GalinskyA.D. (2009). Illusory control: A generative force behind power’s far-reaching effects. Psychological Science, 20, 502–508.
13.
FastN. J.HalevyS.GalinskyA. D. (2012). The destructive nature of power without status. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 391–394.
14.
FestingerL. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.
15.
GalinskyA. D.GruenfeldD. H.MageeJ. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453–466.
16.
GalinskyA. D.MageeJ. C.InesiM. E.GruenfeldD. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17, 1068.
17.
GiancolaP. R.ZeichnerA. (1995). Construct validity of a competitive reaction-time aggression paradigm. Aggressive Behavior, 21, 199–204.
18.
GruenfeldD. H.InesiM. E.MageeJ. C.GalinskyA. D. (2008). Power and the objectification of social targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 111–127.
19.
HowardJ.BlumsteinP.SchwartzP. (1986). Sex, power, and influence tactics in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 102–109.
20.
HuguetP.DumasF.MarshH.RégnerI.WheelerL.SulsJ.… NezlekJ. (2009). Clarifying the role of social comparison in the big-fish–little-pond effect (BFLPE): An integrative study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 156–170.
21.
HuguetP.GalvaingM.-P.MonteilJ.-M.DumasF. (1999). Social presence effects in the Stroop task: Further evidence for an attentional view of social facilitation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1011–1025.
22.
KaufmannH. (1965). Aggression as a function of similarity between aggressor and victim. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 20, 1013–1020.
KeltnerD.YoungR. C.HeereyE. A.OemigC.MonarchN. D. (1998). Teasing in hierarchical and intimate relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1231–1247.
25.
LiebermanJ.SolomonS.GreenbergJ.McGregorH. (1999). A hot new way to measure aggression: Hot sauce allocation. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 331–348.
26.
MendesW. B.BlascovichJ.MajorB.SeeryM. (2001). Challenge and threat responses during downward and upward social comparisons. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 477–497.
27.
MullerD.AtzeniT.ButeraF. (2004). Coaction and upward social comparison reduce illusory conjunction effect: Some support for distraction-conflict theory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 659–665.
28.
MullerD.ButeraF. (2007). The focusing effect of self-evaluation threat in coaction and social comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 194–211.
29.
MullerD.FayantM.-P. (2011). On being exposed to superior others: Consequences of self-threatening upward social comparisons. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 621–634.
30.
SetaJ. J. (1982). The impact of comparison processes on coactors’ task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 281–291.
31.
ShuntichR. J. (1976). Some effects of attitudinal similarity and exposure on attraction and aggression. Journal of Research in Personality, 10, 155–165.
32.
SteeleC. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261–302). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
33.
TaylorS. P. (1967). Aggressive behavior and physiological arousal as a function of provocation and the tendency to inhibit aggression. Journal of Personality, 35, 297–310.
34.
TesserA. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 181–227). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
