A common theme among many religions, particularly those with Abrahamic roots, is that humans are separate from the rest of nature. Though empirical support is lacking, such themes do suggest that religiosity may play a role in shaping the ways that people relate to the natural world. The present research used terror management theory to address this issue. It was hypothesized that death-relevant concerns would moderate the relationship between religious fundamentalism and feelings of connectedness to nature. Across three studies, religious fundamentalism negatively predicted feelings of connectedness to nature when death-relevant thoughts were activated. No such relationship emerged in the absence of death-relevant thought. The implications of these findings for better understanding the role of religion in human/nature relationships and current ecological issues are discussed.
AltemeyerB.HunsbergerB. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 113–133.
2.
AltemeyerB.HunsbergerB. (2004). A revised religious fundamentalism scale: The short and sweet of it. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 14, 47–54.
3.
ArndtJ.Greenberg SimonL. PyszczynskiSolomonS. (1998). Terror management and self-awareness: Evidence that mortality salience provokes avoidance of the self-focused state. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 24, 1216–1227.
4.
AronA.AronE. N.SmollanD. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.
5.
BeckR. (2008). Feeling queasy about the incarnation: Terror management theory, death, and the body of Jesus. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 36, 303–313.
6.
BrookA. (2005). Effect of contingencies of self-worth on self-regulation of behavior (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
7.
CoxC. R.HeflickN.GoldenbergJ. (2011, January). Fleeing the body of Jesus: Religious beliefs as a function of mortality salience, religious fundamentalism, and human-nature primes. Poster presented at the 12th annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Antonio, TX.
8.
CrockerJ.BrookA. T.NiiyaY.VillacortaM. (2006). The pursuit of self-esteem: Contingencies of self-worth and self-regulation. Journal of Personality, 74, 1749–1772.
9.
CrockerJ.LuhtanenR. K.CooperM. L.BouvretteS. (2003). Contingencies of self-worth in college students: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 894–908.
10.
EckbergD. L.BlockerT. J. (1996). Christianity, environmentalism, and the theoretical problem of fundamentalism. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 35, 343–355.
11.
FeinbergM.WillerR. (2011). Apocalypse soon? Dire messages reduce belief in global warming by contradicting just-world beliefs. Psychological Science, 22, 34–38.
12.
FriedmanM.RholesW. S. (2007). Successfully challenging fundamentalist beliefs results in increased death awareness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 794–801.
13.
FritscheI.JonasE.KayserD. N.KoranyiN. (2010). Existential threat and compliance with pro-environmental norms. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 67–69.
14.
GoldenbergJ. L.ArndtJ. (2008). The implications of death for health: A terror management health model for behavioral health promotion. Psychological Review, 115, 1032–1053.
15.
GoldenbergJ. L.PyszczynskiT.GreenbergJ.SolomonS. (2000). Fleeing the body: A terror management perspective on the problem of human corporeality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 200–218.
16.
GoldenbergJ. L.PyszczynskiT.GreenbergJ.SolomonS.KluckB.CornwellR. (2001). I am not an animal: Mortality salience, disgust, and the denial of human creatureliness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 427–435.
17.
GreenbergJ.PyszczynskiT.SolomonS.SimonL.BreusM. (1994). Role of consciousness and accessibility of death-related thoughts in mortality salience effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 627–637.
18.
GreenbergJ.SolomonS.ArndtJ. (2008). A uniquely human motivation. Terror management. In ShahJ.GardnerW. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 113–134). New York, NY: Guilford.
19.
HayesJ.SchimelJ.ArndtJ.FaucherE. H. (2010). A theoretical and empirical review of the death-thought accessibility concept in terror management research. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 699–739.
20.
JonasE.FischerP. (2006). Terror management and religion—Evidence that intrinsic religiousness mitigates worldview defense following mortality salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 553–567.
21.
KerrR. A. (2007). Pushing the scary side of global warming. Science, 316, 1412–1415.
22.
KooleS. L.Van den BergA .E. (2005). Lost in the wilderness: Terror management, action orientation, and nature evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 1014–1028.
MayerS. F.FrantzC. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503–515.
25.
NorenzayanA.HansenI. G. (2006). Belief in supernatural agents in the face of death. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 174–187.
26.
NorenzayanA.HansenI. G.CadyJ. (2008). An angry volcano? Reminders of death and anthropomorphizing nature. Social Cognition, 26, 190–197.
27.
OreskesN. (2004). The scientific consensus on climate change. Science, 306, 1686.
28.
SchultzP. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 327–339.
29.
SherkatD. E.EllisonC. G. (2007). Structuring the religion-environment connection: Identifying religious influences on environmental concern and activism. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 46, 71–85.
30.
VailK. E.III, RothschildZ. K.WeiseD.SolomonS.PyszczynskiT.GreenbergJ. (2010). A terror management analysis of the psychological functions of religion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 84–94.
31.
VessM.ArndtJ. (2008). The nature of death and the death of nature: The impact of mortality salience on environmental concern. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1376–1380.
32.
VessM.ArndtJ.CoxC. R.RoutledgeC.GoldenbergJ. L. (2009). The terror management of medical decisions: The effect of mortality salience and religious fundamentalism on support for faith-based medical intervention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 334–350.
33.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
34.
WhiteL. (1967). The historical roots of our ecological crisis. Science, 155, 1203–1207.
35.
WrightR. T. (1995). Tearing down the green: Environmental backlash in the evangelical sub-culture. Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith, 47, 80–91.
36.
YzerbytV. Y.MullerD.JuddC. M. (2004). Adjusting researchers’ approach to adjustment: On the use of covariates when testing interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 424–431.
