Performance evaluations of male and female junior attorneys in a Wall Street law firm were analyzed. Male supervisors judged male attorneys more favorably than female attorneys on numerical ratings that mattered for promotion but offered narrative comments that showed either no sex effects or greater favorability toward women. Judgments of male attorneys were more consistent overall than they were for female attorneys, and predictors of numerical ratings differed by sex: Narrative ratings of technical competence mattered more for men than women, and narrative ratings of interpersonal warmth mattered more for women than men. Open-ended use of positive performance words—the only outcome that favored women—did not translate into positive numerical ratings for women. The data suggest subtle patterns of gender bias, in which women were harmed by not meeting gendered expectations of interpersonal warmth but were less benefited than men by meeting masculine standards of high technical competence.
BiernatM. (2003). Toward a broader view of social stereotyping. American Psychologist, 58, 1019–1027.
2.
BiernatM.FuegenK.KobrynowiczD. (2010). Shifting standards and the inference of incompetence: Effects of formal and informal evaluation tools. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 855–868.
3.
BiernatM.VescioT. K. (2002). She swings, she hits, she’s great, she’s benched: Implications of gender-based shifting standards for judgment and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 66–77.
4.
BommerW. H.JohnsonJ. L.RichG. A.PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B. (1995). On the interchangeability of objective and subjective measures of employee performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 48, 587–605.
5.
CastillaE. J. (2008). Gender, race, and meritocracy in organizational careers. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 1479–1526.
6.
CuddyA. J. C.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 631–648.
7.
DipboyeR. L. (1985). Some neglected variables in research on discrimination in appraisals. The Academy of Management Review, 10, 116–127.
8.
EaglyA. H.KarauS. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598
9.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.
10.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.
11.
HarberK. (1998). Feedback to minorities: Evidence of a positive bias. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 74, 622–628
12.
HeilmanM. E. (1983). Sex bias in work settings: The lack-of-fit model. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 269–298
13.
HeilmanM. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657–674.
14.
HeilmanM. E.BlockC. J.MartellR. F. (1995). Sex stereotypes: Do they influence perceptions of managers?Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 237–252.
15.
HeilmanM. E.WallenA. S.FuchsD.TamkinsM. M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male-stereotyped tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 416–427.
16.
HenemanR. L. (1986). The Relationship between supervisory ratings and results-oriented measures of performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 39, 811–826.
17.
JuddC. M.James-HawkinsL.YzerbytV.KashimaY. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899–913.
18.
KiteM. E.DeauxK.HainesE. L. (2007). Gender stereotypes. In DenmarkF. L.PaludiM. A. (Eds.), Psychology of women: Handbook of issues and theories (pp. 205–236). 2nd ed. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group.
19.
KraigerK.FordJ. K. (1990). The relation of job knowledge, job performance, and supervisory ratings as a function of race. Human Performance, 3, 269–279.
20.
LandyF. J.FarrJ. L. (1980). Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 72–107.
21.
LynessK. S.HeilmanM. E. (2006). When fit is fundamental: Performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 777–785.
22.
MurphyK. R.ClevelandJ. N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
PennebakerJ. W.FrancisM. E.BoothR. J. (2001). Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2001. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24.
PreacherK. J.CurranP. J.BauerD. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437–448.
25.
RothP. L.HuffcuttA. I.BobkoP. (2003). Ethnic group differences in measures of job performance: A new meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 694–706
26.
RudmanL. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 629–645.
27.
RudmanL. A.FairchildK. (2004). Reactions to counterstereotypic behavior: The role of backlash in cultural stereotype maintenance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 157–176.
28.
RudmanL. A.GlickP. (2008). The social psychology of gender: How power and intimacy shape gender relations. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
29.
SidaniusJ.CraneM. (1989). Job evaluation and gender: The case of university faculty. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 174–197.
30.
SpenceJ. T.BucknerC. E. (2000). Instrumental and expressive traits, trait stereotypes, and sexist attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 44–62.
31.
UhlmannE. L.CohenG. L. (2005). Constructed criteria: Redefining merit to justify discrimination. Psychological Science, 16, 474–480.
32.
VescioT. K.GervaisS. J.SnyderM.HooverA. (2005). Power and the creation of patronizing environments: The stereotype-based behaviors of the powerful and their effects on female performance in masculine domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 658–672.
33.
WilsonK. Y. (2010). An analysis of bias in supervisor narrative comments in performance appraisal. Human Relations, 63, 1903–1933.
