Ample evidence suggests that the behavior of people with low self-esteem (LSEs) can lead to problems in close relationships. To the authors' knowledge, however, no research has investigated the role that perceptions of close others' self-esteem play in undermining beneficial relational processes. In this article, the authors propose that capitalization, a process associated with greater relationship quality, might be hindered by the friends, partners, or family members of LSEs. Across three experiments, the authors show that people are reluctant to disclose their positive experiences (i.e., capitalize) when they believe that the recipient has low self-esteem. Furthermore, the results suggest that people hold back from LSEs largely because they expect the interaction to go poorly for themselves, not because they are concerned about making LSEs feel inferior.
AikenL.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
BaumeisterR. F.CampbellJ. D.KruegerJ.VohsK. D. (2003). Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles?. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4(1):1–44.
3.
BeachS. R. H.TesserA.MendoliaM.AndersonP.CreliaR.WhitakerD. (1996). Self-evaluation maintenance in marriage: Toward a performance ecology of the marital relationship. Journal of Family Psychology, 10(4):379–396.
4.
BellaviaG.MurrayS. (2003). Did I do that? Self esteem-related differences in reactions to romantic partner’s mood. Personal Relationships, 10(1):77–95.
5.
BuhrmesterD.FurmanW.WittenbergM. T.ReisH. T. (1988). Five domains of interpersonal competence in peer relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 991–1008.
6.
CameronJ. J. (2007). Perceptions of self-esteem in dating relationships. Unpublished raw data.
7.
CameronJ. J.MacGregorJ. C. D.HoleC. (2011). The stigma of low self-esteem: Pervasive and extreme. Unpublished manuscript.
8.
ChangC. S.SwannW. B. (2010). Wearing self-esteem like a flag: Conveying our high and low self-esteem to others. Unpublished manuscript.
9.
ClementR. W.KruegerJ. (2002). Social categorization moderates social projection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(3):219–231.
10.
DeHartT.MurrayS. L.PelhamB. W.RoseP. (2003). The regulation of dependency in parent-child relationships. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(1):59–67.
11.
DerrickJ. L.MurrayS. L. (2007). Enhancing relationship perceptions by reducing felt inferiority: The role of attachment style. Personal Relationships, 14(4):531–549.
12.
ExlineJ. J.LobelM. (1999). The perils of outperformance: Sensitivity about being the target of a threatening upward comparison. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3):307–337.
13.
ExlineJ. J.LobelM. (2001). Private gain, social strain: Do relationship factors shape responses to outperformance?. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(5):593–607.
14.
ForestA. L.WoodJ. V. (2010). Some things are better left unsaid: Positive and negative self-disclosure on Facebook, self-esteem, and others' liking. Unpublished manuscript, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
15.
FurrR. M.FunderD. C. (1998). A multimodal analysis of personal negativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6):1580–1591.
16.
GableS. L.GonzagaG. C.StrachmanA. (2006). Will you be there for me when things go right? Supportive responses to positive event disclosures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(5):904–917.
17.
GableS. L.ReisH. T. (2010). Good news! Capitalizing on positive events in an interpersonal context. In ZannaM. L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 42, pp. 195–257). New York: Elsevier.
18.
GableS. L.ReisH. T.ImpettE. A.AsherE. R. (2004). What do you do when things go right? The intrapersonal and interpersonal benefits of sharing positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2):228–245.
19.
GottmanJ. M.LevensonR. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behavior, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(2):221–233.
20.
HayesA. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4):408–420.
21.
HeblM. R.TickleJ.HeathertonT. F. (2000). Awkward moments in interactions between nonstigmatized and stigmatized individuals. In HeathertonT. F.KleckR. E.HeblM. R.HullJ. G. (Eds.), The social psychology of stigma (pp. 275–306). New York: Guilford Press.
22.
HigginsE. T.KingG. A. (1981). Accessibility of social constructs: Information processing consequences of individual and contextual variability. In CantorN.KihlstromJ. (Eds.), Personality, cognition, and social interaction (pp. 69–121). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23.
LangstonC. A. (1994). Capitalizing on and coping with daily-life events: Expressive responses to positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6):1112–1125.
24.
MacGregorJ. C. D.HolmesJ. G. (2008). The influence of perceptions of partner self-esteem in dating relationships. Unpublished raw data.
25.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2005). Attachment theory and emotions in close relationships: Exploring the attachment-related dynamics of emotional reactions to relational events. Personal Relationships, 12(2):149–168.
26.
MurrayS. L.BellaviaG. M.RoseP.GriffinD. W. (2003). Once hurt, twice hurtful: How perceived regard regulates daily marital interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1):126–147.
27.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.GriffinD. W.BellaviaG.RoseP. (2001). The mismeasure of love: How self-doubt contaminates relationship beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(4):423–436.
28.
MurrayS. L.RoseP.HolmesJ. G.DerrickJ.PodchaskiE. J.BellaviaG. (2005). Putting the partner within reach: A dyadic perspective on felt security in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2):327–347.
29.
NewmanL. S.DuffK. J.BaumeisterR. F. (1997). A new look at defensive projection: Thought suppression, accessibility, and biased person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(5):980–1001.
30.
NisbettR. E.WilsonT. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3):231–259.
31.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3):879–891.
32.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
ShroutP. E.BolgerN. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445.
34.
TesserA. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 181–229). 21, New York: Academic Press.
35.
WoodJ. V.HogleA.McClellanJ. C. D. (2009). Self-esteem and relationships. In ReisH.SprecherS. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of human relationships (pp. 1422–1425). 3, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
Zeigler-HillV.MyersE. M. (2009). Is high self-esteem a path to the White House? The implicit theory of self-esteem and the willingness to vote for presidential candidates. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(1):14–19.
