The current study tested the hypothesis that appraisals affect emotions in ogival (s-shaped) functions. Focusing on the appraisal of coping potential and emotions related to competence, the study found evidence in support of this hypothesis. In addition, the study also found evidence suggesting that the ogival effect of coping potential on competence emotions is stronger among high neuroticism individuals.
BelskyD. A.KuhE.WelshR. E. (1980). Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. New York, NY: John Wiley.
2.
BolgerN.ZuckermanA. (1995). A framework for studying personality in the stress process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 890–902.doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.890
3.
EllsworthP. C.SchererK. R. (2003). Appraisal processes in emotions. In DavidsonR. J.GoldsmithH.SchererK. R. (Eds.), Handbook of affective science (pp. 572–595). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4.
EversC.FischerA. H.Rodriguez-MosqueraP. M.MansteadA. S. R. (2005). Anger and social appraisal: A “spicy” sex difference?. Emotion, 5, 258–266. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.3.258
5.
FriedmanM.SavageL. J. (1948). The utility analyses of choices involving risk. Journal of Political Economy, 4, 279–304. doi:10.1086/256692
6.
FrijdaN. H.KuipersP.ter SchureE. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotion action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 212–228. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.212
7.
GluckM. A.ThompsonR. F. (1987). Modelling the neural substrates of associative learning and memory: A computational approach. Psychological Review, 94, 176–191. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.176
8.
GoldbergL. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In MervieldeI.DearyI.De FruytF.OstendorfF. (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (pp. 7–28). Vol. 7, Tilburg, Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
9.
GrinerL. A.SmithC. A. (2000). Contributions of motivational orientation to appraisal and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 727–740. doi:10.1177/0146167200268007
10.
GunthertK. C.CohenL. H.ArmeliS. (1999). The role of Neuroticism in daily stress and coping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1087–1100. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1087
11.
HerraldM. M.TomakaJ. (1999). Patterns of emotion-specific appraisals, coping and cardiovascular reactivity during an ongoing emotional episode. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 434–450. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.434
12.
HorvathP.ZuckermanM. (1993). Sensation seeking, risk appraisal and risky behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 41–52. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(93)90173-Z
13.
KappasA. (2001). A metaphor is a metaphor is a metaphor: Exorcising the homunculus from appraisal theory. In SchererK. R.SchorrA.JohnstoneT. (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, and research (pp. 157–172). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14.
KappasA.PecchinendaA. (2001, June). Chasing the transfer-function approach to the study of appraisals. The effects of nine level of difficulty in an interactive video game task on appraisal and physiological responses. Poster presented at Feelings and Emotions: The Amsterdam Symposium, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
15.
KosslynS. M.KoenigO. (1992). Wet-mind: The new cognitive neuroscience. New York, NY: Free Press.
16.
KrohneH. W. (2003). Individual differences in emotional reactions and coping. In DavidsonR. J.GoldsmithH.SchererK. R. (Eds.), Handbook of affective science (pp. 698–721). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
17.
KuppensP.van MechelenI.SmitsD. J. M.de BoeckP.CeulemansE. (2007). Individual differences in patterns of appraisal and anger experience. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 689–713. doi:10.1080/02699930600859219
18.
LarsenR. J.KetelaarT. (1991). Personality and susceptibility to positive and negative emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 132–140. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.1.132
19.
LearyM. R.HauptA. L.StrausserK. S.ChokelJ. T. (1998). Calibrating the sociometer: The relationship between interpersonal appraisals and state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1290–1299. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1290
20.
NezlekJ. B.van MechelenI.VansteelandtK.KuppensP. (2008). Appraisal–emotion relationships in daily life. Emotion, 8, 145–150. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.8.1.145
21.
RosemanI. J.AntoniouA. A.JoseP. E. (1996). Appraisal determinants of emotions: Constructing a more accurate and comprehensive theory. Cognition and Emotion, 10, 241–277. doi:10.1080/026999396380240
22.
RosemanI. J.EvdokasA. (2004). Appraisals cause experienced emotions: Experimental evidence. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 1–28. doi:10.1080/02699930244000390
23.
RosemanI. J.KaiserS. (2001). Applications of appraisal theory to understanding, diagnosing, and treating emotional pathology. In SchererK. R.SchorrA.JohnstoneT. (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 249–267). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
24.
RosenJ. B.SchulkinJ. (1998). From normal fear to pathological anxiety. Psychological Review, 105, 325–350. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.105.2.325
25.
SmithC. A.EllsworthP. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 813–838. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.813
26.
SmithC. A.EllsworthP. C. (1987). Patterns of appraisal and emotion related to taking an exam. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 475–488. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.475
27.
SmithC. A.KirbyL. D. (2009). Relational antecedents of appraised problem-focused coping potential and its associated emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 481–503. doi:10.1080/02699930802009464
28.
SmithC. A.LazarusR. S. (1993). Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 233–269. doi:10.1080/02699939308409189
29.
SulsJ.MartinR.DavidJ. P. (1998). Person–environment fit and its limits: Agreeableness, neuroticism, and emotional reactivity to personal conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 88–98. doi:10.1177/0146167298241007
30.
TongE. M. W. (2010). Personality influences in appraisal–emotion relationships: The role of neuroticism. Journal of Personality, 78, 393–417. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00620.x
31.
TongE. M. W.EllsworthP. C.BishopG. D. (2009). An s-shaped relationship between changes in appraisals and changes in emotions. Emotion, 9, 821–837. doi:10.1037/a0017812
32.
TreismanM. (1999). There are two types of psychometric function: A theory of cue combination in the processing of complex stimuli with implications for categorical perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 517–546. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.128.4.517
