People who score high on attachment anxiety or avoidance display poorer adjustment than secure individuals in various social, emotional, and behavioral domains. Yet it may be advantageous for groups to include insecure as well as secure members. The authors tested predictions from social defense theory concerning advantages to groups of including members with different attachment patterns. A total of 46 groups were unobtrusively observed in a threatening laboratory situation: The room gradually filled with smoke, apparently because of a malfunctioning computer. Attachment anxiety was associated with quicker detection of the danger and therefore with greater group effectiveness. Attachment-related avoidance was associated with speedier escape responses to the danger once it was detected and therefore with greater group safety. The results remained significant even when extraversion and neuroticism, two possible confounds, were statistically controlled. Implications of the findings for theory and research concerning group processes, threat detection, and individual differences in attachment are discussed.
BelskyJ.SteinbergL.HoutsR. M.Halpern-FelsherB. L. (2010). The development of reproductive strategy in females: Early maternal harshness → earlier menarche → increased sexual risk taking. Developmental Psychology, 46, 120–128.
2.
BowlbyJ. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and anger. New York, NY: Basic Books.
3.
BowlbyJ. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Sadness and depression. New York, NY: Basic Books.
4.
BowlbyJ. (1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books. (Original work published 1969).
5.
BrennanK. A.ClarkC. L.ShaverP. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult romantic attachment: An integrative overview. In SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York, NY: Guilford.
6.
CassidyJ.KobakR. R. (1988). Avoidance and its relationship with other defensive processes. In BelskyJ.NezworskiT. (Eds.), Clinical implications of attachment (pp. 300–323). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
CassidyJ.ShaverP. R. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
8.
DavidovitzR.MikulincerM.ShaverP. R.IjzakR.PopperM. (2007). Leaders as attachment figures: Their attachment orientations predict leadership-related mental representations and followers' performance and mental health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 632–650.
9.
Ein-DorT.MikulincerM.DoronG.ShaverP. R. (2010). The attachment paradox: How can so many of us (the insecure ones) have no adaptive advantages?. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 123–141.
10.
Ein-DorT.MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (in press). Attachment insecurities and the processing of threat-related information: Studying the scripts involved in insecure people’s coping strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
11.
FeeneyB. C.CollinsN. L. (2001). Predictors of caregiving in adult intimate relationships: An attachment theoretical perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 972–994.
12.
FeeneyJ. A.NollerP. (1990). Attachment style as a predictor of adult romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 281–291.
13.
FraleyR. C.WallerN. G. (1998). Adult attachment patterns: A test of the typological model. In SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 77–114). New York, NY: Guilford.
14.
HamiltonW. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour: I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52.
15.
HumphreyS. E.HollenbeckJ. R.MeyerC. J.IlgenD. R. (2007). Trait configurations in self-managed teams: A conceptual examination of the use of seeding to maximize and minimize trait variance in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 885–892.
16.
JohnO. P.DonahueE.KentleR. (1991). The “Big Five” Inventory: Versions 4a and 54(Tech. Rep.). Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality Assessment and Research.
17.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York, NY: Guilford.
18.
KlohnenE. C.LuoS. (2003). Interpersonal attraction and personality: What is attractive—self similarity, ideal similarity, complementarily or attachment security?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 709–722.
19.
MikulincerM.BirnbaumG.WoddisD.NachmiasO. (2000). Stress and accessibility of proximity-related thoughts: Exploring the normative and intraindividual components of attachment theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 509–523.
20.
MikulincerM.GillathO.ShaverP. R. (2002). Activation of the attachment system in adulthood: Threat-related primes increase the accessibility of mental representations of attachment figures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 881–895.
21.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York, NY: Guilford.
22.
NettleD. (2006). The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. American Psychologist, 61, 622–631.
23.
NoftleE. E.ShaverP. R. (2006). Attachment dimensions and the big five personality traits: Associations and comparative ability to predict relationship quality. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 179–208.
24.
ProulxG. (2003). Researchers learn from World Trade Center survivors' accounts. Construction Innovation, 8(1):1–3.
25.
RomE.MikulincerM. (2003). Attachment theory and group processes: The association between attachment style and group-related representations, goals, memories, and functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1220–1235.
26.
ShaverP. R.MikulincerM. (2002). Attachment-related psychodynamics. Attachment and Human Development, 4, 133–161.
27.
SimeJ. D. (1985). Movement toward the familiar: Person and place affiliation in a fire entrapment setting. Environment and Behavior, 17, 697–724.
28.
SmithE. R.MurphyJ.CoatsS. (1999). Attachment to groups: Theory and management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 94–110.
29.
SroufeL. A.WatersE. (1977). Attachment as an organizational construct. Child Development, 48, 1184–1199.
30.
WilsonD. S.Van VugtM.O’GormanR. (2008). Multilevel selection theory and major evolutionary transitions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 6–9.
