The current investigation examined the untested effects of perspective taking on revenge. After taking the perspective of their offender (or not), victims of an experimentally induced injustice were given the opportunity to exact revenge. When the violation was ambiguous, perspective taking resulted in favorable attribution biases and reduced revenge. In contrast, perspective taking increased desires for revenge when the violation was clear. Both effects were apparent only for victims with a high interdependent self-construal, suggesting that they are motivated by the desire to condemn moral threats to one’s social self-concept, either by attributing the offender’s immoral actions to an external cause (decreased revenge) or taking a stand against the offender’s immorality (increased revenge).
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
BatsonC. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
BatsonC. D.CollinsE.PowellA. A. (2006). Doing business after the fall: The virtue of moral hypocrisy. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 321–335.
4.
BatsonC. D.EarlyS.SalvaraniG. (1997). Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imagining how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 751–758.
5.
CialdiniR. B.BrownS. L.LewisB. P.LuceC.NeubergS. L. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathy-altruism relationship: When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 481–494.
6.
CokeJ. S.BatsonC. D.McDavisK. (1978). Empathic meditation of helping: A two-stage model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 752–766.
7.
DavisM. H. (1994). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
8.
DavisM. H.ConklinL.SmithA.LuceC. (1996). The effect of perspective taking on the cognitive representation of persons: A merging of self and other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 713–726.
9.
GollwitzerM.KellerL. (2010). What you did only matters if you are one of us: Offenders' group membership moderates the effect of criminal history on punishment severity. Social Psychology, 41, 20–26.
10.
HardinE. E.LeongF. T. L.BhagwatA. (2004). Factor structure of the Self-Construal Scale: Implications for the multi-dimensionality of self-construal. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 327–345.
11.
HaslamS. A.McGartyC.TurnerJ. C. (1996). Salient group memberships and persuasion: The role of social identity in the validation of beliefs. In NyeJ. L.BrowerA. M. (Eds.), What’s social about social cognition? Research on socially shared cognition in small groups (pp. 29–56). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12.
KerrN. L.HymesR. W.AndersonA. B.WeathersJ. E. (1995). Defendant–juror similarity and mock juror judgments. Law & Human Behavior, 19, 545–567.
13.
ManerJ. K.LuceC. L.NeubergS. L.CialdiniR. B.BrownS.SagarinB. J. (2002). The effects of perspective taking on helping: Still no evidence for altruism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1601–1610.
14.
MarquesJ. M.PaezD. (1994). The “black sheep effect”: Social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. In StroebeW.HewstoneM. (Eds.), European review of social psychology (pp. 37–68). 5, Chichester, UK: Wiley.
15.
McCulloughM. E.RachalK.SandageS. J.WorthingtonE. L.Jr.BrownS. W.HightT. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586–1603.
16.
McCulloughM. E.WorthingtonE. L.Jr.RachalK. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321–336.
17.
McGartyC.TurnerJ. C.OakesP. J.HaslamM. A. (1993). The creation of uncertainty in the influence process: The roles of stimulus information and disagreement with similar others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 17–38.
18.
OkimotoT. G.WenzelM. (2010). The symbolic identity implications of inter and intra-group transgressions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 552–562.
19.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asympotic and resampling procedures for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
20.
RichardsonD. R.HammockG. S.SmithS. M.GardnerW.SignoM. (1994). Empathy as a cognitive inhibitor of interpersonal aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 275–289.
21.
SingelisT. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580–591.
22.
StrahanR.GerbasiK. C. (1972). Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlow-Crowne social desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 191–193.
23.
TurnerJ. C. (1987). The analysis of social influence. In TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 68–88). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
24.
van ProoijenJ.-W. (2006). Retributive reactions to suspected offenders: The importance of social categorizations and guilt probability. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1–13.
25.
WorthingtonE. L. (2006). Forgiveness and reconciliation: Theory and application. New York, NY: Routledge.
