Previous work suggests that trait behavioral activation may link to creativity, a possibility the authors empirically examine in this article. This research is grounded in the dual pathway to creativity model and experiments on approach orientation, and the authors propose that behavioral activation potentiates creativity when and because it facilitates global and flexible processing. Four experiments support this hypothesis and also reveal that when external cues sustain or facilitate local and bottom-up processing, trait behavioral activation negatively relates to creativity. Possible explanations and avenues for new research are discussed.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions.
Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
AmodioD. M.MasterS. L.YeeC. M.TaylorS. E. (2008). Neurocognitive components of the behavioral inhibition and activation systems: Implications for theories of self-regulation. Psychophysiology, 45, 11–19.
3.
AshbyF. G.IsenA. M.TurkenA. U. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106, 529–550.
4.
BaasM.De DreuC. K. W.NijstadB. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of research on mood and creativity: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus?Psychological Bulletin, 134, 739–756.
5.
CarverC. S. (2006). Approach, avoidance, and the self-regulation of affect and action. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 105–110.
6.
CarverC. S.WhiteT. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.
7.
DavidsonR. J. (1998). Affective style and affective disorders: Perspectives from affective neuroscience. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 307–330.
8.
De DreuC. K. W.BaasM.NijstadB. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation in the mood–creativity link: Towards a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 739–756.
9.
De DreuC. K. W.NijstadB. A. (2008). Conflict and creativity: Threat-rigidity or motivated focus?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 648–661.
10.
EisenbergerR.RhoadesL. (2001). Incremental effects of reward on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 728–741.
11.
EkstromR. B.FrenchJ. W.HarmanM. H.DermenD. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests.
Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
12.
ElliotA. J.ThrashT. M. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 804–818.
13.
FeistG. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of the impact of personality on scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309.
14.
FinkeR. A. (1996). Imagery, creativity, and emergent structure. Consciousness & Cognition, 5, 381–393.
15.
FörsterJ. (2009). Relations between perceptual and conceptual scope: How global versus local processing fits a focus on similarity versus dissimilarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 88–111.
16.
FörsterJ.FriedmanR. S.LibermanN. (2004). Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: Consequences for insight and creative cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 177–189.
17.
FriedmanR. S.FörsterJ. (2000). The effects of approach and avoidance motor actions on the elements of creative insight. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 477–492.
18.
FriedmanR. S.FörsterJ. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1001–1013.
19.
FurnhamA.BachtiarV. (2008). Personality and intelligence as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 613–617.
20.
GeorgeJ. M.ZhouJ. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 605–622.
21.
GrayJ. A. (1990). Brain systems that mediate both emotion and cognition. Cognition and Emotion, 4, 269–288.
22.
GrimmL. R.MarkmanA. B.MaddoxW. T.BaldwinG. C. (2008). Differential effects of regulatory fit on category learning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 920–927.
23.
GuilfordJ. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence.
New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
24.
HarkinsS. G. (2006). Mere effort as the mediator of the evaluation-performance relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 436–455.
25.
Harmon-JonesE.AllenJ. J. B. (1997). Behavioral activation sensitivity and resting frontal EEG asymmetry: Covariation of putative indicators related to risk for mood disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychiatry, 106, 159–163.
26.
HigginsE. T.IdsonL. C.FreitasA. L.SpiegelS.MoldenD. C. (2003). Transfer of value from fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1140–1153.
27.
KellerJ.BlessH. (2008). Flow and regulatory compatibility: An experimental test of the flow model of intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 196–209.
28.
KuschelS.FörsterJ.DenzlerM. (2010). Going beyond the information given: How approach versus avoidance cues influence access to higher order information. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 4–11.
29.
McCraeR. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1258–1265.
30.
MednickS. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.
31.
NavonD. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383.
32.
NewellA.SimonH. A. (1972). Human problem solving.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
33.
NijstadB. A.De DreuC. K. W.RietzschelE. F.BaasM. (2010). The dual-pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. European Review of Social Psychology, 21, 34–77.
34.
NijstadB. A.StroebeW. (2006). How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 186–213.
35.
RietzschelE. F.De DreuC. K. W.NijstadB. A. (2007). Personal need for structure and creative performance: The moderating influence of fear of invalidity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 855–866.
36.
SchoolerJ. W.OhlssonS.BrooksK. (1993). Thoughts beyond words: When language overshadows insight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 166–183.
37.
SmillieL. D.JacksonC. J.DalgleishL. I. (2006). Conceptual distinctions among Carver and White’s (1994) BAS scales: A reward-reactivity versus trait impulsivity perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1039–1050.
38.
SmithS. M.BlankenshipS. E. (1991). Incubation and the persistence of fixation in problem solving. American Journal of Psychology, 104, 61–87.
39.
SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P.FongG. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845–851.
40.
SrullT. K.WyerR. S. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660–1672.
41.
TorranceE. P. (1966). Torrance tests of creativity.
Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.
42.
VaughnL. A.MalikJ.SchwartzS.PetkovaZ.TrudeauL. (2006). Regulatory fit as input for stop rules. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 601–611.
43.
WorthyD. A.MaddoxW. T.MarkmanA. B. (2007). Regulatory fit effects in a choice task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1125–1132.
44.
ZelenskiJ. M.LarsenR. J. (1999). Susceptibility to affect: A comparison of three personality taxonomies. Journal of Personality, 67, 761–791.
45.
ZijlstraW. P.Van der ArkL. A.SijtsmaK. (2007). Outlier detection in test and questionnaire data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 531–555.
