The authors applied insights from the group-value theory of procedural justice to investigate minority students' disengagement of self-esteem from academic outcomes. African American college students completed the race-based rejection sensitivity (RS-race) questionnaire. The students were asked to write a position essay on a current topic. They were randomly assigned to complete a demographic form in which they disclosed or did not disclose their race and to receive negative or positive feedback. When race was undisclosed, performance self-esteem was greater after positive feedback relative to negative feedback, regardless of RS-race. When race was disclosed, feedback valence affected self-esteem only among those lower in RS-race. Following positive feedback, these participants showed the greatest gains in self-esteem. Consistent with group-value theory, changes in self-esteem were explained by participants' concerns and emotions around fairness, respect, and acceptance. The authors discuss implications for minority student achievement.
AndersenS. M.DowneyG.TylerT. R. (2006). Becoming engaged in the community: A relational perspective on social identity and community engagement. In DowneyG.EcclesJ. S.ChatmanC. M. (Eds.), Navigating the future: Social identity, coping and life tasks (pp. 210–251). New York: Russell Sage.
2.
AronsonJ.InzlichtM. (2004). The ups and downs of attributional ambiguity: Stereotype vulnerability and the academic self-knowledge of African American college students. Psychological Science, 15, 829–836.
3.
BowenW. G.BokD. (1998). The shape of the river: Long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
CohenG. L.GarciaJ. (2008). Identity, belonging, and achievement: A model, interventions, implications. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 365–369.
5.
CohenG. L.SteeleC. M. (2002). A barrier of mistrust: How negative stereotypes affect cross-race mentoring. . In AronsonIn J. (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychology factors on education (pp. 305–331). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6.
CohenG. L.SteeleC. M.RossL. D. (1999). The mentor’s dilemma: Providing critical feedback across the racial divide. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1302–1318.
7.
CookW. W.MedleyD. M. (1954). Proposed hostility and pharisaic-virtue scales for the MMPI. Journal of Applied Psychology, 38, 414–418.
8.
CrockerJ.KnightK. M. (2005). Contingencies of self-worth. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 200–203.
9.
CrockerJ.MajorB. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608–630.
10.
CrockerJ.MajorB.SteeleC. (1998). Social stigma. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vols. 1 and 2, the ed., pp. 504–553). New York: McGraw-Hill.
11.
CrockerJ.VoelklK.TestaM.MajorB. (1991). Social stigma: The affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 218–228.
12.
CrosbyJ. R.MoninB. (2007). Failure to warn: How student race affects warnings of potential academic difficulty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 663–670.
13.
DowneyG.FeldmanS. I. (1996). Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1327–1343.
14.
DowneyG.LeboltA.RincónC.FreitasA. L. (1998). Rejection sensitivity and children’s interpersonal difficulties. Child Development, 69, 1074–1091.
15.
EllemersN.SpearsR.DoosjeB. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 161–186.
16.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F.NierJ. A.WardC. M.BankerB. S. (1999). Across cultural divides: The value of a superordinate identity. In PrenticeD.MillerD. (Eds.), Cultural divides: Understanding and overcoming group conflict (pp. 173–212). New York: Russell Sage.
17.
GreenglassE. R.JulkunenJ. (1991). Cook-medley hostility, anger, and the type A behavior pattern in Finland. Psychological Reports, 68, 1059–1066.
18.
HeathertonT. F.PolivyJ. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 895–910.
19.
HuLBentlerP. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453.
20.
MajorB.FeinsteinJ.CrockerJ. (1994). Attributional ambiguity of affirmative action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 15, 113–141.
21.
MajorB.KaiserC. R.O’BrienL. T.McCoyS. K. (2007). Perceived discrimination as worldview threat or worldview confirmation: implications for self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1068–1086.
22.
MajorB.SchmaderT. (1998). Coping with stigma through psychological disengagement. In SwimJ. K.StangorC. (Eds.), Prejudice: The target’s perspective (pp. 219–241). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
23.
MendesW. B.MajorB.McCoyS.BlascovichJ. (2008). How attributional ambiguity shapes physiological and emotional responses to social rejection and acceptance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 278–291.
24.
Mendoza-DentonR.DowneyG.PurdieV. J.DavisA.PietrzakJ. (2002). Sensitivity to status-based rejection: Implications for African American students' college experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 896–918.
25.
Mendoza-DentonR.MischelW. (2007). Integrating system approaches to culture and personality: The cultural cognitive-affective processing system (C-CAPS). In KitayamaS.CohenD. (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 175–195). New York: Guilford.
26.
Mendoza-DentonR.Page-GouldE. (2008). Can cross-group friendships influence minority students' well-being at historically White universities?Psychological Science, 19, 933–939.
27.
Mendoza-DentonR.PietrzakJ.DowneyG. (2008). Distinguishing institutional identification from academic goal pursuit: Interactive effects of ethnic identification and race-based rejection sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 338–351.
28.
MischelW.ShodaY. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246–268.
29.
MurphyK.TylerT. (2008). Procedural justice and compliance behaviour: The mediating role of emotions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 652–668.
30.
Page-GouldE.Mendoza-DentonR.TroppL. R. (2008). With a little help from my cross-group friend: Reducing anxiety in intergroup contexts through cross-group friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1080–1094.
31.
PlautV. C.ThomasK. M.GorenM. J. (2009). Is multiculturalism or color blindness better for minorities?Psychological Science, 20(4):444–446.
32.
PostmesT.JettenJ. (2006). Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity. London: Sage.
33.
Purdie-VaughnsV.SteeleC. M.DaviesP. G.DitlmannR.Randall CrosbyJ. (2008). Social identity contingencies: How diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 615–630.
34.
SmithH. J.TylerT. R. (1997). Choosing the right pond: The impact of group membership on self-esteem and group-oriented behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 146–170.
35.
SpearsR.EllemersN.DoosjeB.BranscombeN. (2006). The individual within the group: Respect!. In PostmesT.JettenJ. (Eds.), Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity (pp. 175–195). London: Sage.
36.
SteeleC. M. (1992). Race and the schooling of Black Americans. The Atlantic Monthly, 269(4):68–78.
37.
SteeleC. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.
38.
SteeleC. M.AronsonJ. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.
39.
SteeleC. M.SpencerS. J.AronsonJ. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In . In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 379–440). Vol. 34, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
40.
TylerT. R. (2001). Why do people rely on others? Social identity and social aspects of trust. In CookK. S. (Ed.), Trust in society (pp. 285–306). Vol. 2, New York: Russell Sage.
41.
TylerT. R.BladerS. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 349–361.
42.
TylerT. R.DegoeyP. (1995). Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 482–497.
43.
TylerT. R.DegoeyP.SmithH. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 913–930.
44.
TylerT. R.HuoY. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York: Russell Sage.
45.
TylerT. R.LindA. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115–191.
46.
WaltonG. M.CohenG. L. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 82–96.
47.
WohlM. J. A.BranscombeN. R. (2005). Forgiveness and collective guilt assignment to historical perpetrator groups depend on level of social category inclusiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 288–303.
