The purpose of this study was to discover music educators’ views on string music education by surveying active NAfME members in Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and to compare results based on teaching area: string/orchestra (SO) and non-string/orchestra (NSO). While statistically we cannot generalize results because of the response rate and numbers of SO and NSO teachers in our study, those who responded to our online survey support our hypothesis that fewer string/orchestra programs exist in our four focus states than other U.S. regions. Respondents agreed that string/orchestra programs would benefit overall music programs, allowing for more student participation. However, results suggest some NSO teachers choose program preservation over music program diversification, and ultimately student opportunities for music participation. The largest barriers to implementation of new programs were financial costs and administrative support, then scheduling, availability of qualified teachers, and lack of facilities. It is unclear if NSO teachers’ views represent an “unspoken” barrier. Additional research to determine reasons for fewer programs is needed to increase the numbers of string/orchestra programs and enrollment in existing programs.
BarnesG. V., & McCashinR. (2002). All-state orchestras: A survey of practices and procedures. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 20(2), 16–20. doi: 10.1177/875512330202000205
2.
ByoJ. L., & CassidyJ. W. (2005). The role of the string project in teacher training and community music education. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53, 332–347. doi: 10.1177/00224294050530040
3.
FergusP. M. (1964). Factors affecting the development of the orchestra and string program in Minnesota secondary schools, 1940-1960. Journal of Research in Music Education, 12, 235–243. doi: 10.2307/3343792
4.
FergusonK. (2003). Becoming a string teacher. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 157, 38–48. Retrieved: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40319185
5.
FredricksonW. E., GeringerJ. M., & PopeD. A. (2013). Attitudes of string teachers and performers toward preparation for and teaching of private lessons. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61, 217–232. doi: 10.1177/0022429413485245
6.
GillespieR., & HamannD. L. (1999). Career choice among string music education students in American Colleges and Universities. Journal of Research in Music Education, 42, 266–278. doi: 10.2307/3345784
7.
GillespieR., & HamannD. L. (2010). An investigation of new string programs established in American schools between 1999 and 2009. String Research Journal, 1, 25–38. Retrieved from http://www.astaweb.com
8.
GillespieR., RussellJ. A., & HamannD. L. (2014). String music educators’ perceptions of the impact of new string programs on student outcomes, school music programs, and communities. Journal of Research in Music Education, 62, 175–187. doi: 10.1177/0022429414531987
HamannD. L., FrostR., & DravesT. (2011). Factors influencing secondary string students’ string teaching career choices. String Research Journal, 2, 49–66. Retrieved from http://www.astaweb.com
11.
HoadB. E. (1965). Factors affecting the development of the orchestra and string program in Kansas secondary schools. (Master's thesis). The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS. Available from http://catalog.lib.ku.edu/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?bbid=3425845
12.
KantorskiV. J. (1995). A content analysis of doctoral research in string education, 1936-1992. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43, 288–297. doi: 10.2307/3345728
13.
KeiperS., SandeneB. A., PerskyH. R., and KuangM. (2009). The nation's report card: arts 2008 music & visual arts (NCES 2009–488).Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
National Center for Educational Statistics (2009). Table 224.10: Average national assessment of educational progress (NAEP) arts scale score of 8th-graders, percentage distribution by frequency of instruction, and percentage participating in selected activities, by subject and selected characteristics: 2008. Digest of Educational Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d14/tables/dt14_224.10.asp
PellegrinoK. (2014). Examining the intersections of music making and teaching for four string teachers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 62, 128–147. doi: 10.1177/002242941453043
18.
PellegrinoK., & MillicanJ. S. (2014). Influences on string teachers’ career decisions. String Research Journal, V, 87–108. Retrieved from https://www.astaweb.com/
19.
PellegrinoK., & RussellJ. A. (2015). String teachers’ practices and attitudes regarding their primary string instrument in settings inside and outside the classroom. Bulletin of the Council of Research in Music Education, 204, 7–22. doi: 10.5406/bulcouresmusedu.204.0009
20.
PerskyH. R., SandeneB. A., & AskewJ. M. (2001). The NAEP 1997 arts report card (NCES 1999-486r) (3rd printing). Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
RussellJ. A. (2008). A discriminant analysis of the factors associated with the career plans of string music educators. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53, 204–219. doi: 10.1177/0022429408326762
24.
RussellJ. A., & HamannD. L. (2011). The perceived impact of string programs on K-12 music programs. String Research Journal, II, 49–66. Retrieved from http://www.astaweb.com
25.
SchmidtM. (2005). Preservice string teachers’ lesson-planning processes: An exploratory study. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53, 6–25. doi: 10.1177/002242940505300102
26.
SmithC. M. (1995). The status of undergraduate string teacher education in American colleges and universities. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43, 139–155. doi: 10.2307/3345675
27.
SmithC. M. (1997). Access to string instruction in American public schools. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 650–662. doi: 10.2307/3345429
28.
TastR. L. (2014). The status of public school orchestras in Kansas. String Research Journal, V, 39–54. Retrieved from http://www.astaweb.com
29.
ThomasK. B. (2014). A place in the curriculum: Superintendents’ Perceptions of Fine Arts Programs (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10415/4113
