The purpose of this study was to examine the factors influencing teachers’ inclusion of music composition activities in the school orchestra curriculum. Specific research questions included: 1) What are the pre-service composing experiences of school orchestra teachers? 2) What are teachers’ beliefs regarding the benefits and challenges of including composing in the school orchestra curriculum? 3) What percentage of orchestra teachers include composing experiences in their curricula and what are the characteristics of those experiences? 4) What are the factors influencing orchestra teachers’ inclusion of composing in the curriculum? Most respondents (63%) reported having no composing experiences prior to college. Participants born in 1975 and later had significantly more pre-service composing experiences than participants born before 1963. Fifty-two percent of respondents rarely or never included composing in their classes. Significant differences in participants’ perceptions of composing were found based on age, teaching experience, pre-service composing experiences, and frequency of including composing activities in the curriculum. Pressures related to music performance appeared to strongly influence those who did not include composing in their classes.
BarrettM.S. (2003). Freedoms and constrains: constructing musical worlds through the dialogue of composition. In HickeyM. (Ed.), Why and how to teach music composition: a new horizon for music education (pp. 3–27). Reston, VA: MENC.
2.
BarrettM.S. (2006). ‘Creative collaboration’: an ‘eminence’ study of teaching and learning in music composition.Psychology of Music, 34, 195–218. doi: 10.1177/0305735606061852
3.
BerkleyR. (2001). Why is teaching composing so challenging? A survey of classroom observation and teachers’ opinions.British Journal of Music Education, 18, 119–138.
4.
BiasiniA. (1971). MMCP interaction (2nd ed.). Bardonia, NY: Media Materials.
5.
BoldenB. (2007). Collaborative class composing.The Canadian Music Educator, 49(1), 44.
6.
BushJ. E. (2007). Composing and arranging in middle school general music.General Music Today, 21(1), 6.
7.
ByoS. J. (1999). Classroom teachers’ and music specialists’ perceived ability to implement the national standards for music education.Journal of Research in Music Education, 47, 111–123. doi: 10.2307/3345717
8.
CMP. (1973). CMP in perspective.Music Educators Journal, 59(9), 34.
9.
Consortium of National Arts Education Associations. (1994). Dance, music, theatre, visual arts: what every young American should know and be able to do in the arts: National standards for arts education.Reston, VA: MENC.
10.
ConwayC. (2008). The implementation of the national standards in music education: capturing the spirit of the standards.Music Educators Journal, 94(4), 34–39. doi: 10.1177/00274321080940040104
11.
DaviesP. M. (1963). Music composition by children. In GrantW. (Ed.), Music in Education (pp. 108–115). London: Butterworths.
12.
DillmanD. A. (2007). Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method.Hoboken, N.J: Chichester: Wiley.
13.
EisnerE. (1982). Cognition and curriculum.New York: Longman.
14.
FehrR. C. (2011). A creative experience for music teachers: introduce young students to composition.Teaching Music, 18(6), 11.
15.
GillespieR., & HamannD. L. (1998). The status of orchestra programs in the public schools.Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 75–86. doi: 10.2307/3345761
HopkinsM. (2013). A descriptive case study of two veteran string teachers’ perceptions of including composing in middle school orchestra.Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 196, 25–44.
18.
KaschubM., & SmithJ. (2009). Minds on music: composition for creative and critical thinking.Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
19.
KennedyM. A. (2002). Listening to the music: compositional processes of high school composers.Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 94–110. doi: 10.2307/3345815
20.
LehmanP. R. (1993). Implications of national standards.Music Educators Journal, 80(3), 25–28. doi: 10.2307/3398670
21.
LehmanP.R. (2008). A vision for the future: looking at the standards.Music Educators Journal, 94(4), 28–32. doi: 10.1177/00274321080940040103
22.
LeonhardC. (1988). The human values of music education. In GatesJ. T. (Ed.), Music education in the United States: Contemporary issues (pp. 185–192). Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press.
23.
LingS. J. (1974). Missing: Some of the most exciting creative moments of life.Music Educators Journal, 61(3), 40; 93–95.
24.
LohrS. L. (2008). Coverage and sampling. In LeeuwE. D., HoxJ. J., & DillmanD. A. (Eds.), International handbook of survey methodology (pp. 97–112). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25.
MadisonT. H. (1958). The need for new concepts in music education. In HenryN.B. (Ed.), Basic concepts in music education, the fifty-seventh yearbook of the national society for the study of education, part 1 (pp. 24–25). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
26.
MarkM. L. (1996). Contemporary music education (3rd ed.). New York: Schirmer Books.
27.
McCombsB.L., LauerP.A., & ParalezA. (1997). Researcher test manual for the learner-centered battery.Aurora, CO: McREL.
28.
McMurrayF. (1958). Pragmatism in music education. In HenryN.B. (Ed.), Basic concepts in music education, the fifty-seventh yearbook of the national society for the study of education, part 1 (pp. 46–47). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
29.
MehrensW. A., & LehmannI. J. (1991). Measurement and evaluation in education and psychology (4th ed.). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
30.
MooreP. (2010). Getting an early start in music composition.Teaching Music, 18(3), 57.
31.
MursellJ. L. (1953). Music in American schools (2nd ed.). New York: Silver Burdett.
32.
NewberryE., & StrandK. (2007). Teachers share practical advice on classroom composing.General Music Today, 20(2), 14.
33.
OdenaO., & WelchG. F. (2007). The influence of teachers’ backgrounds on their perceptions of musical creativity: A qualitative study with secondary school music teachers.Research Studies in Music Education, 28, 71–81.
34.
OrmanE. K. (2002). Comparison of the national standards for music education and elementary music specialists’ use of class time.Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 155–164. doi: 10.2307/3345819
35.
PhelpsK. B. (2008). The status of instruction in composition in elementary general music classrooms of MENC members in the state of Maryland. Unpublished Master'S Thesis, University of Maryland, College Park.
36.
ReimerB. (2004). Reconceiving the standards and the school music program.Music Educators Journal, 91(1), 33–37. doi: 10.2307/3400103
37.
RuthmannA. (2007). The composers’ workshop: An approach to composing in the classroom.Music Educators Journal, 93(4), 38.
38.
SchmidtC. P., BakerR., HayesB., & KwanE. (2006). A descriptive study of public school music programs in Indiana.Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education169, 25–37.
39.
SchoppS. E. (2006). A study of the effects of national standards for music education, number 3, improvisation and number 4, composition on high school band instruction in New York state. (Teachers College, Columbia University). Retrieved from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/305361987?accountid=14667
40.
StambaughL. (2003). Take a chance with aleatory composing.Teaching Music, 10(5), 26.
41.
StephensJ. (2003). Imagination in education: Strategies and models in the teaching and assessment of composition. In HickeyM. (Ed.), Why and how to teach music composition: a new horizon for music education (pp. 31–53). Reston, VA: MENC.
42.
StrandK. (2006). Survey of Indiana music teachers on using composition in the classroom.Journal of Research in Music Education, 54, 154–167. doi: 10.1177/002242940605400206
43.
TurnerK. (2006). Composition in orchestra class.Teaching Music, 14(2), 32.
44.
VelosoA.L., and CarvalhoS. (2012). Music composition as a way of learning: emotions and the situated self. In OdenaO. (Ed.), Musical creativity: insights from music education research (pp. 73–91). Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
