This study seeks to answer the question: What are the attitudes of South Georgia public school superintendents toward curricular string instruction? A10-item questionnaire was developed and sent to 44 rural public school superintendents. Eighty-four percent of the superintendents (N = 37) responded to the questionnaire. The primary findings of this survey regarding the respondents’ school district music curriculum indicated that 89.2% of the districts did not offer curricular string instruction. The primary findings regarding the respondents’ thoughts about string instruction indicated that if money were not a factor, 78.4% of the respondents would like their school board to hire a string teacher.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BergonziL. (1995). The national standards in music education: A call for comprehensive music education for all children. In HotchkissG. (Ed.), Loyola University music education leadership symposia: Implications of national music standards for string education.Elkhart, IN: United Musical Instruments.
2.
Georgia Department of Education. (2001). Georgia Public Education Directory.Atlanta, GA.
3.
GillespieR., & HamannD. L. (1998). The status of orchestra programs in the public schools. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46 (1), 75–86.
4.
JensenJ. K. (1983). An analysis of attitudes toward fine arts education among Nevada state legislators, lobbyists, school board trustees, superintendents, curriculum coordinators, principals, fine arts educators, and other educators in Nevada public schools (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, 1982). Dissertation Abstracts International, 43 (07), 2204A.
5.
JonesB. J. (1985). Preservice programs for teaching in a rural environment: Survey of selected states and recommendations. Summary of the results and recommendations. CO. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 261 826)
6.
LegumS., CaldwellN., GokselH., HaynesJ., HynsonC, RustK., & BlecherN. (1993). The 1990 high school transcript study: Data file user's manual.Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
7.
LeonardC. (1991). Status of arts education in American public schools.Urbana, IL: National Arts Education Research Center at the University of Illinois.
8.
PattenM. L. (2001). Questionnaire research: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Pyrczak.
9.
PowellA. G., FarrarE., & CohenD. K. (1985). The shopping mall high school: Winners and losers in the educational marketplace.Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
10.
ReddickT. L., & PeachL. E. (1984). Attitudes toward curriculum issues among rural educators in Tennessee. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 251 260).
11.
ReedM. M. (2001). College of education institutional report.Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University.
12.
SmithC. M. (1997). Access to string instruction in American public schools. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45 (4), 650–662.
13.
SmithC. M. (1997). String education: The stepchild of American music education. American String Teacher, 47 (4), 37–42.
14.
SmithC. M. (2000). String programs in low socioeconomic level school districts. Journal of String Research, 1, 97–115.
15.
StraubD. A. (1995). National standards for the arts: Context and issues. In HotchkissG. (Ed.), Loyola University music education leadership symposia: Implications of national music standards for string education.Elkhart, IN: United Musical Instruments.
SurwillB. J. (1980). Recommendations to teacher educators for preparing future teachers for careers in rural schools.Billings, MT: Eastern Montana College. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 207 779)
