The purpose of this study was to review research studies in the area of string technique and pedagogy. Nearly 50 research reports were reviewed and categorized into those concerned with predictions of success in a string program, class organization, and the development of right- and left-hand position. Results of various studies were reported and implications for teaching were discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BergonziL. S. (1991). The effects of finger placement markers and harmonic context on the development of intonation performance skills and other aspects of the musical achievement of sixth-grade beginning string students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
2.
BergonziL. S. (1997). Effects of finger markers and harmonic context on performance of beginning string students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45(2), 197–211.
3.
CarmodyW. J. (1989). The effects of chamber music experience on intonation and attitudes among junior high school string players (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, 1988). Dissertation Abstracts International, 49 (8), 2140A.
4.
CheslockL. (1931). An introductory study of the violin vibrato. Volume 1. Research Studies in Music.Baltimore, MD: Peabody Conservatory.
5.
CoddingP. A. (1987). The effects of visual versus verbal instruction on beginning guitar students' tuning accuracy. In MadsenC. K. & PrickettC. A. (Eds.), Applications of Research in Music Education. (pp. 272–284). Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
6.
CowdenR. L. (1970). A comparison of the effectiveness of first and third position approaches to violin instruction. (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, 1969). Dissertation Abstracts International, 30 (7), 3039A.
7.
CowdenR. L. (1972). A comparison of first and third position approaches to violin instruction. Journal of Research in Music Education.20(4), 505–509.
8.
DennisA. (1979). The effects of three methods for supporting the double bass on tone quality and intensity. Dialogue in Instrumental Music Education, 3, 43–48.
9.
DennisA. (1984). The effects of three methods for supporting the double bass on tone quality and intensity. Journal of Research in Music Education, 32(2), 95–103.
10.
EnglishW. H. (1985). The relative effectiveness of the amount of piano accompaniment in beginning string class instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Houston, Houston.
11.
GarmanB. R. (1992). The effects of accompaniment texture and cotextual pitch distance on string instrumentalists' intonational performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL.
12.
GeringerJ. M. (1978). Intonational performance and perception of ascending scales. Journal of Research in Music Education, 26(1), 32–40.
13.
GeringerJ. M., & SoginD. W. (1988). An analysis of musicians' intonational adjustments within the duration of selected tones. Contributions to Music Education, 15, 1–6.
14.
GeringerJ. M., & WittA. C. (1985). An investigation of tuning performance and perception of string instrumentalists. The Bulletin for the Council of Research in Music Education, 85, 90–101.
15.
GillespieR. (1988). Identification of factors for evaluating upper string instrument spiccato bowing and a comparison of two instructional approaches. Dialogue in Instrumental Music Education, 12(1), 21–29.
16.
GillespieR. (1993). Factors for evaluating upper string instrument vibrato and a comparison of two instructional approaches. Dialogue in Instrumental Music Education, 17(1), 37–51.
17.
GlennK. A. (1999). Rote vs. note: The relationship of working memory capacity to performance and continuation in beginning string classes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley.
18.
GreeneP. C. (1936). Violin performance with reference to tempered, natural, and Pythagorean intonation. In SeashoreC. (Ed.), Studies in the Psychology of Music, 4 (pp. 232–251). Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
19.
GreeneP. C. (1937). Violin intonation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 9(1), 43–44.
20.
HollingsheadM. (1932). A study of the vibrato in artistic violin playing. In SeashoreC. (Ed.), Studies in the Psychology of Music, 1 (pp. 281–288). Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
21.
JacobsC. (1969). Investigation of kinesthetic in violin playing. Journal of Research in Music Education, 17(1), 112–114.
22.
JensenJ. L. (1990). A comparison of initial violin bow hold approaches in undergraduate string techniques classes, including assessments of the influence of baseline ratings of subjects' finger dexterity and mental images of the violin bow hold. Dialogue in Instrumental Music Education, 14(1), 10–30.
23.
KantorskiV J. (1984). The effects of differential accompaniment on string instrumentalists' intonational performance in extreme registers (scales, direction, intervals). (Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, 1984). Dissertation Abstracts International, 45 (9), 2688A.
24.
KantorskiV. J. (1986). String instrument intonation in upper and lower registers: The effects of accompaniment. Journal of Research in Music Education, 34(3), 200–210.
25.
KantorskiV. J., & EllsworthE. V (1988). The effects of homogeneous and heterogeneous instruction in college string techniques classes on music education majors. Dialogue in Instrumental Music Education, 12(2), 80–92.
26.
KerausR. K. (1973). An achievement study of private and class Suzuki violin instruction. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Rochester, 1973). Dissertation Abstracts International, 34 (2), 808A.
27.
LaderE. C. (1977). The effect of differential treatments on the intonation of string instrumentalists. Unpublished master's thesis, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
28.
LoweH. L. (1973). A study of the tone quality of beginning violin students using the long bow-stroke approach as compared to the short bow-stroke approach. (Doctoral dissertation, Ball State University, 1973). Dissertation Abstracts International, 34 (9), 6024A.
29.
MaagR. R. (1974). A comparison of the effectiveness of pentatonic versus diatonic instruction in the intonation of beginning string students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
30.
MasterJ. P. (1979). The relationship of muscular dexterity to performance competence on string instruments. Contributions to Music Education, 7, 41–49.
31.
NickersonJ. F. (1949). Intonation of solo and ensemble performance of the same melody. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 21(6), 593–595.
32.
PapichG., & RainbowE. (1974). A pilot study of performance practices of twentieth-century musicians. Journal of Research in Music Education, 22(1), 24–34.
33.
RegerS. (1932). The string instrument vibrato. In SeashoreC. (Ed.), Studies in the Psychology of Music, 4 (pp. 305–338). Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
34.
RosenbaumD. A., WeberR. J., HazelettW. M., & HindorffV (1986). The parameter remapping effect in human performance: Evidence from tongue twisters and finger tumblers. Journal of Memory and Language, 25(6), 710–725.
35.
SalzbergR. S. (1980). The effects of visual stimulus and instruction on intonation accuracy of string instrumentalists. Psychology of Music, 8(2), 42–49.
36.
SalzbergR. S., & SalzbergC. L. (1981). Praise and corrective feedback in the remediation of incorrect left-hand positions of elementary string players. Journal of Research in Music Education, 29(2), 125–133.
37.
SlaymanH. H. (1965). Problems in teaching and learning the violin: An exploratory study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati.
38.
SmallA. R. (1937). An objective analysis of artistic violin performance. In SeashoreC. (Ed.), Studies in the Psychology of Music, 4 (pp. 172–231). Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
39.
SmithC. M. (1985). The effect of finger placement markers on the development of intonation accuracy in beginning string students. Dialogue in Instrumental Music Education, 9(2), 62–70.
40.
SmithC. M. (1987). The effect of finger placement markers on the development of intonation accuracy in fourth and fifth grade beginning string students. Dialogue in Instrumental Music Education, 11(2), 71–77.
41.
SmithC. M. (1995). Development of performance pitch accuracy of string students. The Bulletin for the Council of Research in Music Education, 124, 13–23.
42.
SoginD. W. (1989). An analysis of string instrumentalists' performed intonational adjustments within an ascending and descending pitch set. Journal of Research in Music Education, 37(2), 104–111.
43.
SoginD. A. (1997). An exploratory study on contingent verbal feedback for accuracy of intonation in musical performance. Perceptual and Motor Skill, 84(1), 217–218.
44.
StancaroneM. (1992). The role of music aptitude, fine motor skills, coding ability, behavioral characteristics and academic achievement in predicting achievement in instrumental music. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pace University, New York.
45.
Van CampD. J. (1989). An investigation of the effects of a researcher-designed string music curriculum on the playing skills of mildly mentally handicapped middle school students grouped in homogeneous and heterogeneous classes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus.
46.
WeberM. J. (1995). An investigation of selected muscle potential activity in violin/viola vibrato. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas, Denton.
47.
YarboroughC, & BallardD. L. (1990). The effect of accidentals, scale degrees, direction, and performer opinions on intonation. Update: The Applications of Research in Music Education, 8(2), 19–22.
