The accelerating loss of biodiversity and genetic diversity poses an urgent threat to ecosystems and future generations. This concept article proposes a model centered on biobanks and advanced reproductive biotechnologies as strategic conservation tools, particularly within biodiversity hotspots such as Misiones, Argentina. We outline how institutions like biodiversity institutes, zoos, and biotech firms can collaborate to develop decentralized, scalable cryopreservation capacity. Emphasizing the IMiBio model, we explore how international collaboration, ethical frameworks, and locally grounded governance can support the preservation and future restoration of species. This approach supports both conservation and regeneration, providing a roadmap for hotspot-centered biodiversity recovery.1–3
CeballosG, EhrlichPR, DirzoR. Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2017; 114(30):E6089–E6096; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1704949114
2.
IPBES. Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Bonn; 2019.
3.
WWF. Living Planet Report 2020: Bending the curve of biodiversity loss. WWF International: Gland; 2020.
4.
HoltWV, ComizzoliP. Genome resource banking for wildlife conservation: Promises and caveats. Anim Reprod Sci, 2021; 228:106738; doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2021.106738
5.
Convention on Biological Diversity. Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization. CBD: Montreal; 2011.
6.
ComizzoliP, SongsasenN, HagedornM, WildtDE. Comparative cryobiological traits and requirements for gametes and gonadal tissues collected from wildlife species. Theriogenology, 2012; 78(8):1666–1681; doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.04.008
7.
ComizzoliP. Biobanking and fertility presevation for rare and endagered species Animal Reproduction , 2017;14(1):30–33; doi: 10.21451/1984-3143-AR889
8.
HarveyCA, ChacónM, DonattiCI. Climate-smart landscapes: Opportunities and challenges for integrating adaptation and conservation. Conserv Lett, 2014; 7(2):77–90; doi: 10.1111/conl.12066
9.
AgrawalA, ChhatreA, HardinR. Changing governance of the world’s forests. Science, 2008; 320(5882):1460–1462; doi: 10.1126/science.1155369
10.
MazurP. Cryopreservation of the germplasm of animals used in biological and medical research: Importance, impact, status, and future directions. Biol Reprod, 2020; 102(3):612–625; doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioz231
11.
RoqueR, et al.Cryopreservation of agronomic plant germplasm using vitrification-based methods: An overview of selected case studies. Plants, 2021; 10(1):68; doi: 10.3390/plants10010068
12.
Holt WV, ComizzoliP. Conservation biology and reproduction in a time of developmental plasticity.Biomolecules. 2022;12(9):1297; doi: 10.3390/biom12091297
13.
HagedornM, et al.Cryopreservation strategies for aquatic species. Aquaculture, 2021; 548:737584; doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737584
14.
FarquharsonKA, HoggCJ, GrueberCE. Offspring survival changes over generations of captive breeding. Nat Commun, 2021; 12(1):3045; doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22631-0
15.
CavillL, et al.Severe genomic consequences of inbreeding in an endangered bird. Genes (Basel), 2022; 13(2):349; doi: 10.3390/genes13020349
16.
McLaughlinJF, et al.Red-listing genetics: Towards inclusion of genetic diversity in IUCN assessments. Conserv Genet, 2020; 21(4):589–598; doi: 10.1007/s10592-020-01256-5
17.
GrossenC, et al.Genetic load in natural populations. Curr Biol, 2020; 30(1):R21–R3; doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.11.037
18.
ReedDH, NicholasAC, StrattonGE. The genetic quality of individuals impacts population dynamics. Anim Conserv, 2007; 10(3):275–283; doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2007.00123.x
19.
JacksonJA, et al.Genomic erosion in a demographically recovered bird species during conservation rescue. Conserv Biol, 2022; 36(1):e13831; doi: 10.1111/cobi.13831
20.
HohenlohePA, FunkWC, RajoraOP. Population genomics for wildlife conservation and management. Mol Ecol, 2021; 30(1):62–82; doi: 10.1111/mec.15720
21.
HasselgrenM, Norén K.Inbreeding in natural mammal populations: historical perspectives and future challenges. Mammal Review (2019) 1–15; doi: 10.1111/mam.12169
22.
FrankhamR, BallouJD, BriscoeDA. Introduction to Conservation Genetics. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge; 2010.
23.
LacyRC. Importance of genetic variation to the viability of mammalian populations. J Mammal, 1997; 78(2):320–335; doi: 10.2307/1382885
24.
Ben-NunIF, MontagueSC, HouckML, et al.Induced pluripotent stem cells from highly endangered species. Nat Methods, 2011; 8(10):829–831; doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1706
25.
Lou J, Li W, Chen P, Chen H, Shakoor A, Chen Y, et al. Application of induced pluripotent stem cells in the conservation of endangered animals. Stem Cell Res Ther 2025;16:261; doi: 10.1186/s13287-025-04392-5
26.
FranklinIR. Evolutionary change in small populations. In: (SouléME, WilcoxBA., eds). Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective. Sinauer: Sunderland, MA; 1980, pp. 135–49.
27.
SouléME. Thresholds for survival: Maintaining fitness and evolutionary potential. In: (SouléME, WilcoxBA., eds). Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective. Sinauer: Sunderland, MA; 1980; pp. 151–169.
28.
HobanS, BrufordM, D’Urban JacksonJ, et al.Genetic diversity targets and indicators in the CBD post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework must be improved. Biol Conserv, 2020; 248:108654; doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108654
29.
HvilsomC, SegelbacherG, EkblomR, et al.Selecting Species and Populations for Monitoring of Genetic Diversity. IUCN: Gland, Switzerland; 2022; doi:10.2305/IUCN.CH.2022.07.en
30.
HutchinsonH, KorodyM. Advancing stem cell technologies for conservation of wildlife biodiversity. iScience, 2024; 26(3):107834; doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107834
31.
Le GacF, et al.Understanding and assisting reproduction in wildlife species using microfluidics. Theriogenology, 2020; 146:124–133; doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.01.037
32.
Fujihara M, Comizzoli P. Human and wildlife biobanks of germplasms and reproductive tissues can contribute to a broader concept of One Health. F S Rep 2025;6(S1):63–66; doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2025.01.004
33.
Hikabe O, Hamazaki N, Nagamatsu G, Obata Y, Hirao Y, Hamada N, et al. Reconstitution in vitro of the entire cycle of the mouse female germ line. Nature 2016;539:299–303; doi: 10.1038/nature20104
34.
BrufordMW, et al.The CryoArks biobank project: A national UK strategy for genetic resource conservation. Nat Sci Collections Assoc, 2020; 1(1):1–9.
35.
EAZA Biobank. A collaborative initiative to secure animal genetic resources. Amsterdam: European Association of Zoos and Aquaria; 2020. Available from: https://www.eaza.net/conservation/eaza-biobank/ [Last accessed: September1, 2025].
36.
Pérez-EsponaS; the CryoArks Consortium. Conservation-focused biobanks: A valuable resource for wildlife DNA forensics. Forensic Science International: Animals and Environments. 2021; 1:100017; doi: 10.1016/j.fsiae.2021.100017
37.
Species360. The Future of Species Conservation: How cryopreservation, collaboration, and data sharing will help save biodiversity. Species360 Science Report. 2021. Available from: https://www.species360.org [Last accessed: September1, 2025].
38.
Revive & Restore, US Fish & Wildlife Service. Partnership to protect the genetic diversity of America’s endangered species. Biobanking.com; 2021. Available from: https://reviverestore.org [Last accessed: September1, 2025].
39.
ShawMR, et al.Building meaningful collaboration in conservation. Conserv Sci Pract, 2020; 2(12):e280; doi: 10.1111/csp2.280
40.
SchwartzMW, et al.Integrating in-situ and ex-situ data management to support species recovery programs. Biol Conserv, 2020; 244:108527; doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108527
