Sustainable and climate-resilient agricultural management depends on sustaining soil multifunctionality, the foundation of all agricultural production. As demand for agricultural and bio-based products rises due to population growth, dietary shifts, and the bioeconomy transition, scenario-based approaches can guide long-term decision-making under uncertainty. This study presents five German Soil Management Pathways (DE-SMPs), developed through a combined sectoral and geographical downscaling of the Shared Socio-economic Pathways for European agriculture and food systems. The methodology integrates stakeholder-driven trend identification across demographic, economic, technological, institutional, and environmental drivers with expert-based narrative construction to derive national and sector specific scenarios. The resulting pathways reveal contrasting futures for soil health and demonstrate that soil multifunctionality outcomes depend critically on the interplay between policy and governance, technological trajectories, and societal priorities. Technology emerges as a necessary but insufficient condition, effective only when embedded in supportive policy and institutional frameworks. The results emphasize that soil multifunctionality is fundamentally interconnected with broader societal choices regarding environmental governance, trade, technological investment, and commitment to sustainability transitions.
AbsarS. M.PrestonB. L.. 2015. “Extending the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways for Sub-National Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability Studies.” Global Environmental Change33: 83–96. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.004.
2.
AbsonD. J.FischerJ.LeventonJ., et al.2017. “Leverage Points for Sustainability Transformation.” Ambio46 (1): 30–39. doi:10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y.
3.
AlcamoJ.HenrichsT.. 2008. “Towards Guidelines for Environmental Scenario Analysis.” In Environmental Futures: The Practice of Environmental Scenario Analysis, edited by AlcamoJ., 13–35. Elsevier.
4.
Andrade DíazC.AlbersA.Zamora-LedezmaE.HamelinL.. 2024. “The Interplay Between Bioeconomy and the Maintenance of Long-Term Soil Organic Carbon Stock in Agricultural Soils: A Systematic Review.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews189: 113890. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2023.113890.
5.
BrevikE. C.HarteminkA. E.. 2010. “Early Soil Knowledge and the Birth and Development of Soil Science.” Catena83 (1): 23–33. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2010.06.011.
6.
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) and Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft (BMEL). 2020. Nationale Bioökonomiestrategie.
7.
Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft. 2021. Ackerbaustrategie 2035: Perspektiven Für Einen Produktiven Und Vielfältigen Pflanzenbau, 1–68.
8.
Cárceles RodríguezB.Durán-ZuazoV. H.Soriano RodríguezM.García-TejeroI. F.Gálvez RuizB.Cuadros TaviraS.. 2022. “Conservation Agriculture as a Sustainable System for Soil Health: A Review.” Soil Systems6 (4): 87. doi:10.3390/soilsystems6040087.
9.
CoffeyB.2016. “Unpacking the Politics of Natural Capital and Economic Metaphors in Environmental Policy Discourse.” Environmental Politics25 (2): 203–22. doi:10.1080/09644016.2015.1090370.
10.
CostanzaR.DalyH. E.. 1992. “Natural Capital and Sustainable Development.” Conservation Biology6 (1): 37–46. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.610037.x.
11.
DaugbjergC.FeindtP. H.. 2017. “Post-Exceptionalism in Public Policy: Transforming Food and Agricultural Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy24 (11): 1565–1584. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1334081.
12.
EEA. 2023. Soil Monitoring in Europe: Indicators and Thresholds for Soil Health Assessments. EEA report: no. 2022, 08. Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2800/956606.
13.
European Commission. 2023. Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Soil Monitoring and Resilience (Soil Monitoring Law). (COM/2023/416 final).
14.
FialaV.JacobK.. 2024. “Combining the Multi-Level Perspective Framework With Participatory Scenario Development to Explore the Many Facets of Food System Transitions in Germany.” Sustainability Science19 (4): 1259–75. doi:10.1007/s11625-024-01505-6.
15.
FisherD.2000. “Understanding Technology Adoption Through System Dynamics Modeling: Implications for Agribusiness Management.” The International Food and Agribusiness Management Review3 (3): 281–96. doi:10.1016/S1096-7508(01)00048-9.
16.
GinzkyH.2024. “A New Soil Protection Legislation for Germany – Challenges, Conceptual Approaches and Next Steps.” Soil Security14: 100123. doi:10.1016/j.soisec.2023.100123.
17.
GlæsnerN.HelmingK.de VriesW.. 2014. “Do Current European Policies Prevent Soil Threats and Support Soil Functions?” Sustainability6 (12): 9538–63. doi: 10.3390/su6129538.
18.
GuerryA. D.PolaskyS.LubchencoJ., et al.2015. “Natural Capital and Ecosystem Services Informing Decisions: from Promise to Practice.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America112 (24): 7348–7355. doi:10.1073/pnas.1503751112.
19.
HelmingK.DaedlowK.PaulC., et al.2018. “Managing Soil Functions for a Sustainable Bioeconomy-assessment Framework and State of the Art.” Land Degradation & Development29 (9): 3112–3426. doi:10.1002/ldr.3066.
20.
HelmingK.DaedlowK.HansjürgensB.KoellnerT.. 2018. “Assessment and Governance of Sustainable Soil Management.” Sustainability10 (12): 4432. doi:10.3390/su10124432.
21.
HigginsV.BryantM.AllanC.CockfieldG.LeithP.CookeP.. 2023. “Frame Alignment Processes for Locally Useful Agricultural Soil Research and Extension: The Role of Farm Advisors.” Sociologia Ruralis63 (4): 843–64. doi:10.1111/soru.12449.
22.
InayatullahS.2015. What Works: Case Studies in the Practice of Foresight. Tamkang University Press.
23.
IngramJ.2008. “Are Farmers in England Equipped to Meet the Knowledge Challenge of Sustainable Soil Management? An Analysis of Farmer and Advisor Views.” Journal of Environmental Management86 (1): 214–28. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.036.
24.
JagustovićR.PapachristosG.ZougmoréR. B., et al.2021. “Better Before Worse Trajectories in Food Systems? An Investigation of Synergies and Trade-Offs Through Climate-Smart Agriculture and System Dynamics.” Agricultural Systems190: 103131. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103131.
25.
JaxK.CalestaniM.ChanK. M. A., et al.2018. “Caring for Nature Matters: A Relational Approach for Understanding Nature's Contributions to Human well-being.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability35: 22–29. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.009.
26.
JiangL.O'NeillB. C.. 2017. “Global Urbanization Projections for the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways.” Global Environmental Change42: 193–99. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.008.
27.
JuergesN.HansjürgensB.. 2018. “Soil Governance in the Transition Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy – A Review.” Journal of Cleaner Production170: 1628–1639. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.143.
28.
KarnerK.MitterH.SinabellF.SchönhartM.. 2024. “Participatory Development of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways for Austria's Agriculture and Food Systems.” Land Use Policy142: 107183. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107183.
29.
KeesstraS. D.BoumaJ.WallingaJ., et al.2016. “The Significance of Soils and Soil Science Towards Realization of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.” SOIL2 (2): 111–28. doi: 10.5194/soil-2-111-2016.
30.
KimH.PetersonG. D.CheungW. W., et al.2023. “Towards a Better Future for Biodiversity and People: Modelling Nature Futures.” Global Environmental Change82: 102681. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102681.
31.
KokK.PeddeS.GrambergerM.HarrisonP. A.HolmanI. P.. 2019. “New European Socio-Economic Scenarios for Climate Change Research: Operationalising Concepts to Extend the Shared Socio-Economic Pathways.” Regional Environmental Change19 (3): 643–54. doi:10.1007/s10113-018-1400-0.
32.
KrieglerE.O'NeillB. C.HallegatteS., et al.2012. “The Need for and Use of socio-economic Scenarios for Climate Change Analysis: a New Approach Based on Shared socio-economic Pathways.” Global Environmental Change22 (4): 807–22. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.05.005.
33.
KrzywoszynskaA.2023. “Taking Soil Care Seriously: A Proposition.” In Cultural Understanding of Soils, edited by PatzelN.GrunwaldS.BrevikE. C.FellerC., 395–408. Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-13169-1.
34.
LehtonenH. S.AakkulaJ.FronzekS., et al.2021. “Shared Socioeconomic Pathways for Climate Change Research in Finland: Co-Developing Extended SSP Narratives for Agriculture.” Regional Environmental Change21 (1): 7. doi:10.1007/s10113-020-01734-2.
35.
LenschowA.NewigJ.ChalliesE.. 2016. “Globalization's Limits to the Environmental State? Integrating Telecoupling into Global Environmental Governance.” Environmental Politics25 (1): 136–159. doi:10.1080/09644016.2015.1074384.
36.
LundquistC.HashimotoS.DenbobaM. A.PetersonG.PereiraL.ArmenterasD.. 2021. “Operationalizing the Nature Futures Framework to Catalyze the Development of nature-future Scenarios.” Sustainability Science16 (6): 1773–1775. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-01014-w.
37.
MacLarenC.MeadA.van BalenD., et al.2022. “Long-Term Evidence for Ecological Intensification as a Pathway to Sustainable Agriculture.” Nature Sustainability5 (9): 770–79. doi:10.1038/s41893-022-00911-x.
38.
MartinC.Pan-MontojoJ.. 2025. “European Agriculture and International Trade in Historical Perspective, 1945-2000.” In Commodity Chains Under Pressure: Resilience Through Coping, Adaptation, and Transformation, edited by EspeterL. M.HeringL., 164–85. Edward Elgar Publishing. doi:10.4337/9781035355303.
MitterH.TechenA.-K.SinabellF., et al.2019. “A Protocol to Develop Shared Socio-economic Pathways for European Agriculture.” Journal of Environmental Management252: 109701. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109701.
42.
MitterH.TechenA.-K.SinabellF., et al.2020. “Shared Socio-Economic Pathways for European Agriculture and Food Systems: The Eur-Agri-SSPs.” Global Environmental Change65: 102159. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102159.
43.
MossR. H.EdmondsJ. A.HibbardK. A., et al.2010. “The next Generation of Scenarios for Climate Change Research and Assessment.” Nature463 (7282): 747–756. doi:10.1038/nature08823.
44.
NishizawaT.KayS.SchulerJ., et al.2023. “Towards Diverse Agricultural Land Uses: Socio-Ecological Implications of European Agricultural Pathways for a Swiss Orchard Region.” Regional Environmental Change23 (3): 97. doi:10.1007/s10113-023-02092-5.
45.
OlssonL.BarbosaH.BhadwalS., et al.2019. Land Degradation: IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land 5 Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and 6 Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
46.
PanagosP.JonesA.LugatoE.BallabioC.. 2025. “A Soil Monitoring Law for Europe.” Global Challenges9 (3): 2400336. doi:10.1002/gch2.202400336.
47.
PatelM.KokK.RothmanD. S.. 2007. “Participatory Scenario Construction in Land Use Analysis: An Insight Into the Experiences Created by Stakeholder Involvement in the Northern Mediterranean.” Land Use Policy24 (3): 546–61.
48.
PaulC.KuhnK.Steinhoff‐KnoppB.WeißhuhnP.HelmingK.. 2021. “Towards a Standardization of Soil‐Related Ecosystem Service Assessments.” European Journal of Soil Science72 (4): 1543–58. doi: 10.1111/ejss.13022.
49.
PeddeS.KokK.Kemp-BenedictE., et al.2025. “Emerging Regional Perspectives of Global Climate Change Scenarios: A Systematic Review.” Climatic Change178 (6): 122. doi:10.1007/s10584-025-03965-w.
50.
PereiraL.DaviesK. K.BelderE. D., et al.2020. “Developing Multiscale and Integrative Nature–People Scenarios Using the Nature Futures Framework.” People and Nature2 (4): 1172–95. doi:10.1002/pan3.10146.
51.
PragerK.PosthumusH.. 2010. “Socio-Economic Factors Influencing Farmers’ Adoption of Soil Conservation Practices in Europe.” In Resource Planning, Development and Management. Human Dimensions of Soil and Water Conservation: A Global Perspective, edited by NapierT. L.. Nova Science.
52.
PragerK.CreaneyR.Lorenzo-ArribasA.. 2017. “Criteria for a System Level Evaluation of Farm Advisory Services.” Land Use Policy61: 86–98. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.11.003.
53.
Puig de La BellacasaM.2015. “Making Time for Soil: Technoscientific Futurity and the Pace of Care.” Social Studies of Science45 (5): 691–716. doi:10.1177/0306312715599851.
54.
RajahJ. K.BlanzB.KopainskyB.SchoenbergW.. 2025. “An Endogenous Modelling Framework of Dietary Behavioural Change in the Fully Coupled Human-Climate FRIDA v2.1 Model.” Geoscientific Model Development18 (18): 5997–6022. doi:10.5194/gmd-18-5997-2025.
55.
RichardsonK.SteffenW.LuchtW., et al.2023. “Earth Beyond Six of Nine Planetary Boundaries.” Science Advances9 (37): eadh2458. doi:10.1126/sciadv.adh2458.
56.
RobertsC.GeelsF. W.. 2019. “Conditions for Politically Accelerated Transitions: Historical Institutionalism, the Multi-Level Perspective, and Two Historical Case Studies in Transport and Agriculture.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change140: 221–240. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.019.
57.
RoehlH.2012. Handelsblatt-Bücher. Werkzeuge Des Wandels: Die 30 Wirksamsten Tools Des Change Managements. Schäffer-Poeschel Verlag für Wirtschaft Steuern Recht GmbH.
58.
SamirK.LutzW.. 2017. “The Human Core of the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways: Population Scenarios by Age, Sex and Level of Education for All Countries to 2100.” Global Environmental Change. Human and Policy Dimension42: 181–192. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.004.
59.
SarkarS.SkalickyM.HossainA., et al.2020. “Management of Crop Residues for Improving Input Use Efficiency and Agricultural Sustainability.” Sustainability12 (23): 9808. doi:10.3390/su12239808.
60.
SchreefelL.SchulteR.BoerI.SchrijverA. P.van ZantenH.. 2020. “Regenerative Agriculture – The Soil Is the Base.” Global Food Security26: 100404. doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100404.
61.
SchrijverR.PoppeK.DaheimC.. 2016. “Precision Agriculture and the Future of Farming in Europe: Scientific Foresight Study.” doi:10.2861/020809.
62.
SeegerM.2023. “Agricultural Soil Degradation in Germany.” In The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, edited by PereiraP.Muñoz-RojasM.BogunovicI.ZhaoW., Vol. 121, 87–103, 1st ed.Springer International Publishing; Imprint Springer. Impact of Agriculture on Soil Degradation II: A European Perspective. doi:10.1007/698_2022_948.
63.
SiemonsA.SchneiderL.JungH., et al.2025. Funding Climate-Friendly Soil Management: Appropriate Policy Instruments and Limits of Market-Based Approaches. Öko-Institut e.V., Ecologic Institute, Universität Gießen.
64.
SrivastavaR. K.PurohitS.AlamE.IslamM. K.. 2024. “Advancements in Soil Management: Optimizing Crop Production Through Interdisciplinary Approaches.” Journal of Agriculture and Food Research18: 101528. doi:10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101528.
65.
StaveK. A.KopainskyB.. 2015. “A System Dynamics Approach for Examining Mechanisms and Pathways of Food Supply Vulnerability.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences5 (3): 321–336. doi:10.1007/s13412-015-0289-x.
66.
StermanJ.2001. “System Dynamics Modeling: Tools for Learning in a Complex World.” California Management Review43 (4): 8–25.
67.
StraussV.PaulC.DönmezC.LöbmannM.HelmingK.. 2023. “Sustainable Soil Management Measures: A Synthesis of Stakeholder Recommendations.” Agronomy for Sustainable Development43 (1): 17. doi:10.1007/s13593-022-00864-7.
68.
StrubenJ.ChanD.TalukderB.DubéL.. 2025. “Market Pathways to Food Systems Transformation Toward Healthy and Equitable Diets Through Convergent Innovation.” Nature Communications16 (1): 4246. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-59392-z.
69.
TechenA.-K.HelmingK.. 2017. “Pressures on Soil Functions from Soil Management in Germany. A Foresight Review.” Agronomy for Sustainable Development37 (6): 64. doi:10.1007/s13593-017-0473-3.
70.
VeermanC.CorreiaT. P.BastioliC., et al.2020. Caring for Soil Is Caring for Life: Ensure 75 % of Soils Are Healthy by 2030 for Healthy Food, People, Nature and Climate: Interim Report. 1st ed.Independent expert report. Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2777/918775.
71.
VisserS.KeesstraS.MaasG.CleenM.MolenaarC.. 2019. “Soil as a Basis to Create Enabling Conditions for Transitions Towards Sustainable Land Management as a Key to Achieve the SDGs by 2030.” Sustainability11 (23): 6792. doi:10.3390/su11236792.
72.
VogelH.-J.EberhardtE.FrankoU., et al.2019. “Quantitative Evaluation of Soil Functions: Potential and State.” Frontiers in Environmental Science7: 164. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2019.00164.
73.
VogelH.-J.WollschlägerU.HelmingK., et al.2019. “Assessment of Soil Functions Affected by Soil Management.” In Atlas of Ecosystem Services, edited by SchröterM.BonnA.KlotzS.SeppeltR.BaesslerC., 77–82. Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96229-0_13.
74.
WadouxA. M. C.McBratneyA. B.. 2023. “Participatory Approaches for Soil Research and Management: A Literature-Based Synthesis.” Soil Security10: 100085.
75.
WangT.JinH.ClayD.SieverdingH. L.CheyeS.2024. “Carbon Supply Elasticity and Determinants of Farmer Carbon Farming Decisions.” Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy46 (3): 1190–1213. doi:10.1002/aepp.13442.
76.
WiniwarterV.2014. “Environmental History of Soils.” In Environmental History: Vol. 4. The Basic Environmental History, edited by AgnolettiM.Neri SerneriS., 79–119, 1st ed.Springer International Publishing.
77.
WrightG.BradfieldR.CairnsG.. 2013. “Does the Intuitive Logics Method - and its Recent Enhancements - Produce “Effective” Scenarios?” Technological Forecasting and Social Change80 (4): 631–642. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.09.003.
78.
ZandersenM.HyytiäinenK.MeierH. E. M., et al.2019. “Shared Socio-Economic Pathways Extended for the Baltic Sea: Exploring Long-Term Environmental Problems.” Regional Environmental Change19 (4): 1073–1086. doi:10.1007/s10113-018-1453-0.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
