AlbertsonL.CutlerT.. 1976. “Delphi and the Image of the Future.” Futures8 (5): 397‐404.
2.
AligicaP. D.2011. “A Critical Realist Image of the Future Wendell Bell's Contribution to the Foundations of Futures Studies.” Futures43 (6): 610‐617.
3.
Alvial-PalavicinoC.2016. “The future as Practice. A Framework to Understand Anticipation in Science and Technology.” TECNOSCIENZA: Italian Journal of Science and Technology Studies6 (2): 135‐172.
4.
AndersonB.2020. “Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism.” In The New Social Theory Reader, edited by SeidmanS.AlexanderJ.C., 282‐288. 2nd Edition. London, England: Routledge.
5.
AndersonR.2016. “Afrofuturism 2.0 and the Black Speculative Arts Movement: Notes on a Manifesto.” Obsidian42 (1/2): 228‐236.
BenjaminR, (ed). 2019. Captivating Technology: Race, Carceral Technoscience, and Liberatory Imagination in Everyday Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
12.
BezoldC.1999. “Alternative Futures for Communities.” Futures31 95): 465‐473.
BiggsR.Raudsepp-HearneC.Atkinson-PalomboC.BohenskyE.BoydE.CundillG.ZurekM.. 2007. “Linking Futures Across Scales: a Dialog on Multiscale Scenarios.” Ecology and Society12 (1): 17.
15.
BirchK.2020. “Technoscience Rent: Toward a Theory of Rentiership for Technoscientific Capitalism.” Science, Technology, and Human Values45 (1): 3‐33.
16.
BlauveltA.2019. Defuturing the Image of the Future. Designs for Different Futures, Walker Art Center41‐47.
17.
BorupM.BrownN.KonradK.Van LenteH.. 2006. “The Sociology of Expectations in Science and Technology.” Technology Analysis and Strategic Management18 (3–4): 285‐298.
18.
BostromN.2014. Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
19.
BouldingE.1978. “Futuristics and the Imaging Capacity of the West. Cultures of the Future: 7‐31.
20.
BouldingK. E.1956. The Image: Knowledge in Life and Society (Vol. 47). Michigan, USA: University of Michigan Press.
21.
BrandhoferG.TenglerK.. 2022. “Towards Futures Literacy Through Computational Thinking and Storytelling Activities.” In Lepuschitz et al. Robotics in Education: RiE 2022, 84‐90. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
22.
BrattonB. H.2016. The Stack: On software and Sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
23.
BrockP.2021. “Futurismo e Gênese de Gênero na Ficção Científica Brasileira.” Zanzalá-Revista Brasileira de Estudos sobre Gêneros Cinematográficos e Audiovisuais8 (1): 8‐18.
24.
BrownN.MichaelM.. 2003. “A Sociology of Expectations: Retrospecting Prospects and Prospecting Retrospects.” Technology Analysis and Strategic Management15 (1): 3‐18.
25.
BrownN.RappertB.WebsterA., (eds). 2000. Contested futures: A Sociology of Prospective Techno-Science. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Ltd.
26.
ButlerP., (ed). 2021. Critical Black Futures: Speculative Theories and Explorations. Berlin, Germany: Springer Nature.
27.
CandyS.2010. The Futures of Everyday Life: Politics and the Design of Experiential Scenarios. Manoa: University of Hawaii.
28.
CandyS.DunaganJ.. 2017. “Designing an Experiential Scenario: The People Who Vanished.” Futures86: 136‐153.
29.
CastoriadisC.1998. The Imaginary Institution of Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
ChanA. S.2014. Networking Peripheries: Technological Futures and the Myth of Digital Universalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31.
ChermackT. J.2019. “Response to Spaniol and Rowland: “Defining Scenario”.” Futures and Foresight Science1 (2): e13.
32.
DahlgrenK.PinkS.StrengersY.NichollsL.. 2022. “Co-Presence and Contingency: Comics as a Methodological Innovation in Researching Automated Futures.” Qualitative Inquiry28 (7): 767‐780.
33.
DatorJ.2009. “Alternative Futures at the Manoa School.” Journal of Futures Studies14 (2): 1‐18.
34.
DavisH. B.2022. “Black on Black Futures: A Call to Diversify the Discipline of Black Futuring.” Journal of Futures Studies26 (3): 89‐95.
35.
de La BellacasaM. P.2009. “Touching Technologies, Touching Visions. The Reclaiming of Sensorial Experience and the Politics of Speculative Thinking.” Subjectivity28: 297‐315.
36.
de La BellacasaM. P.2011. “Matters of Care in Technoscience: Assembling Neglected Things.” Social Studies of Science41 (1): 85‐106.
37.
de La BellacasaM. P.2017. Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds (Vol. 41). Minneapolis, Minnesota: U of Minnesota Press.
38.
De la CadenaM.BlaserM., (eds). 2018. A World of Many Worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
39.
DelantyG.2019. “The Future of Capitalism: Trends, Scenarios and Prospects for the Future.” Journal of Classical Sociology19 (1): 10‐26.
40.
DillonP.HoweT.. 2003. “Design as Narrative: Objects, Stories and Negotiated Meaning.” International Journal of Art and Design Education22 (3): 289‐296.
41.
DobroćP.BögelP.UphamP.. 2023. “Narratives of Change: Strategies for Inclusivity in Shaping Socio Technical Future Visions.” Futures145: 103076.
42.
DowneyG. L.Zuiderent-JerakT.. 2016. “Making and Doing: Engagement and Reflexive Learning in STS.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by U. Felt, F. Fouche, C. A. Miller, L. Smith-Doerr, pp. 223-250. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43.
DuroseC.PerryB.RichardsonL.. 2022. “Is Co-Production a ‘Good’ Concept? Three Responses.” Futures142: 102999.
44.
EllulJ.1974. “The Technological Society.” In Science, Technology, and Freedom, edited by TruittW. H.SomononsT. W. G., 12‐14. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
45.
EscobarA.2018. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
46.
FarnellI.2021. “Things Are Heating Up: Reflections on Utopia, Dystopia and Climate Change, the 20th International Conference of the Utopian Studies Society, Europe.” Exchanges: The Interdisciplinary Research Journal8 (2): 1‐7.
47.
FergnaniA.2020. Futures Triangle 2.0: Integrating the Futures Triangle with Scenario Planning. Foresight (Cambridge), 22 (2),178‐188.
ForlanoL.2016. “Decentering the Human in the Design of Collaborative Cities.” Design Issues32 (3): 42‐54.
51.
ForlanoL. E.HalpernM. K.. 2023. “Speculative Histories, Just Futures. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction.” Just Accepted. doi:10.1145/3577212
52.
FrenchF.Hirskyj-DouglasI.VäätäjäH.PonsP.KarlS.ChisikYVilkerD.. 2021. “Ethics and Power Dynamics in Playful Technology for Animals: Using Speculative Design to Provoke Reflection.” In Proceedings of the 24th International Academic Mindtrek Conference, Tampere/Virtual Finland, 1–3 June, 2021, 91‐101.
53.
FrithD.TapinosE.. 2020. “Opening the ‘Black Box’ of Scenario Planning Through Realist Synthesis.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change151: 119801.
54.
GeelsF. W.2010. “Ontologies, Socio-Technical Transitions (to Sustainability), and the Multi-Level Perspective.” Research Policy39 (4): 495‐510.
55.
Ghamari-TabriziS.2000. “Simulating the Unthinkable: Gaming Future War in the 1950s and 1960s.” Social Studies of Science30 (2): 163‐223.
56.
GiddensA. (1998). Risk Society: The Context of British Politics. In J. Franklin (Ed.), The Politics of Risk Society (23-34). Polity Press: Cambridge, United Kingdom.
57.
GordinM. D.TilleyH.PrakashG.. 2010. “Introduction. Utopia and Dystopia Beyond Space and Time.” In Utopia/Dystopia, edited by GordinM. D.TilleyH.PrakashG., 1‐18. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58.
GordonA. V.RamicM.RohrbeckR.SpaniolM. J.. 2020. “50 Years of Corporate and Organizational Foresight: Looking Back and Going Forward.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change154: 119966.
59.
GustonD. H.2014. “Understanding ‘Anticipatory Governance.” Social Studies of Science44 (2): 218‐242.
60.
HarawayD.1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies14 (3): 575‐599.
61.
HongS. H.2020. Technologies of Speculation. New York: New York University Press.
62.
HuiY.2017. “On Cosmotechnics: For a Renewed Relation Between Technology and Nature in the Anthropocene.” Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology21 (2/3): 319‐341.
63.
HuiY.2020. “Cosmotechnics.” Angelaki25 (4): 1‐2.
64.
HutchingsK.2019. “Decolonizing Global Ethics: Thinking with the Pluriverse.” Ethics and International Affairs33 (2): 115‐125.
65.
InayatullahS.1990. “Deconstructing and Reconstructing the Future: Predictive, Cultural and Critical Epistemologies.” Futures22 (2): 115‐141.
66.
InayatullahS.2008. “Six Pillars: Futures Thinking for Transforming.” Foresight10 (1): 4‐21.
67.
IrwinR.2019. “Decolonising Technological Futures: A Dialogical Triptych between Te Haumoana White, Ruth Irwin, and Tegmark’s artificial intelligence.” Futures112: 102431.
68.
JalbertK.WillowA.CasagrandeD.PaladinoS., eds. 2017. ExtrACTION: Impacts, Engagements, and Alternative Futures. New York: Routledge.
69.
JasanoffS.KimS. H.. 2015. Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
70.
JasanoffS.SimmetH. R.. 2021. “Renewing the Future: Excluded Imaginaries in the Global Energy Transition.” Energy Research and Social Science80: 102205.
71.
JeffriesS.2022. Everything, All the Time, Everywhere: How We Became Postmodern. New York: Verso Books.
72.
JemalaM.2010. “Evolution of Foresight in the Global Historical Context.” Foresight12 (4): 5‐81.
73.
KononiukA.Sacio-SzymańskaA.OllenburgS.TrivelliL.. 2021. “Teaching Foresight and Futures Literacy and its Integration into University Curriculum.” Форсайт15 (3 (eng)): 105‐121.
74.
KonradK.BöhleK.. 2019. “Socio-Technical Futures and the Governance of Innovation Processes—An Introduction to the Special Issue.” Futures109: 101‐107.
75.
KonradK.Van LenteH.GrovesC.SelinC.. 2016. “Performing and Governing the Future in Science and Technology.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by FeltU.FoucheF.MillerC. A.Smith-DoerrL., 465‐493. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
76.
LatourB.2012. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
77.
LawJ.LinW. Y.. 2017. “The Stickiness of Knowing: Translation, Postcoloniality, and STS.” East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal11 (2): 257‐269.
78.
ListD.2006. “Action Research Cycles for Multiple Futures Perspectives.” Futures38 (6): 673‐684.
79.
LöschA.GrunwaldA.MeisterM.Schulz-SchaefferI.. 2019. “Introduction: Socio‐Technical Futures Shaping the Present.” In Socio-Technical Futures Shaping the Present: Empirical Examples and Analytical Challenges, edited by LoschA.GrunwaldA.MeisterM.Schulz-SchaefferI., 1‐14. New York: Springerlink.
80.
LubaA. R.2017. The Change Game: A Critical Game For Recognizing and Generating Alternative. [Master’s Thesis, OCAD University].
81.
MarxL.1987. “Does Improved Technology Mean Progress?” Technology Review90 (1): 33‐41.
82.
McCrayW. P.2012. The Visioneers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
83.
McLuhanM.PowersB. R.. 1989. The Global Village: Transformations in World Life and Media in the 21st century. New York: Oxford University Press.
MillerR.2018. “Introduction: Futures Literacy: Transforming the Future.” In Transforming the Future, 1‐12. London, England: Routledge.
86.
MilneG.2020. Smoke and Mirrors: How Hype Obscures the Future and How to See Past It. Robinson.
87.
MitchellA.ChaudhuryA.. 2020. “Worlding Beyond ‘the ’Eend” of ‘the World’: White Apocalyptic Visions and BIPOC Futurisms.” International Relations34 (3): 309‐332.
88.
MorganD.2002. “Images of the Future: a Historical Perspective.” Futures34 (9–10): 883‐893.
89.
MorozovE.2013. To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York: Public Affairs.
90.
NelsonJ. P.SelinC. L.ScottC. T.. 2021. “Toward Anticipatory Governance of Human Genome Editing: A Critical Review of Scholarly Governance Discourse.” Journal of Responsible Innovation8 (3): 382‐420.
91.
NemerD.2021. Tecnologia do Oprimido: Desigualdade e o Mundano Digital nas Favelas do Brasil. Vitoria, Brazil: Editora Milfontes.
92.
OettingenG.MayerD.. 2002. “The Motivating Function of Thinking About the Future: Expectations Versus Fantasies.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology83 (5): 1198‐1212.
Reina-RozoJ. D.2021. “Art, Energy and Technology: the Solarpunk Movement.” International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace8 (1): 47‐60.
102.
Reina-RozoJ. D.2022. Tecnologías Para Abrazar el Sol (Primera) [Computer Software]. Zenodo. doi:10.5281/zenodo.6590612
103.
RoseM.2011. “Envisioning the Future: Ontology, Time and the Politics of Non-Representation.” In Taking Place: Non-representational Theories in Human Geography, edited by HarrisonP.AndersonB., 355‐376. Farnham: Ashgate.
104.
RosnerL.2013. The Technological Fix: How People Use Technology to Create and Solve Problems. New York: Routledge.
105.
RubinA.LinturiH.. 2001. “Transition in the Making. The Images of the Future in Education and Decision-Making.” Futures33 (3–4): 267‐305.
106.
SartoriL.TheodorouA.. 2022. “A Sociotechnical Perspective for the Future of AI: Narratives, Inequalities, and Human Control.” Ethics and Information Technology24 (1): 4.
107.
SartreJ. P.1940. L'imaginaire Psychologie Phénoménologique de L'Imagination. Montreal, Quebec: Gallimard.
108.
SavranskyM.WilkieA.RosengartenM.. 2017. “The Lure of Possible Futures: On Speculative Research.” In WilkieA.SavranskyM.RosengartenM., (Eds.) Speculative Research: The Lure of Possible Futures, pp. 1‐17. London, England: Routledge.
109.
SelinC.2008. “The Sociology of the Future: Tracing Stories of Technology and Time.” Sociology Compass2 (6): 1878‐1895.
110.
SimonsM.2017. “The Parliament of Things and the Anthropocene: How to Listen to ‘Quasi-Objects.” Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology21 (2/3): 150‐174.
111.
SismondoS.2020. “Sociotechnical Imaginaries: An Accidental Themed Issue.” Social Studies of Science50 (4): 505‐507.
112.
SlaughterR. A.2020. “Farewell Alternative Futures?” Futures121: 102496.
113.
SörumN.FuentesC.. 2022. “How Sociotechnical Imaginaries Shape Consumers’ Experiences of and Responses to Commercial Data Collection Practices.” Consumption Markets and Culture26 (1): 1‐23.
TaylorC.2002. “Modern Social Imaginaries.” Public Culture14 (1): 91‐124.
116.
ThompsonN. A.ByrneO.. 2022. “Imagining Futures: Theorizing the Practical Knowledge of Future-Making.” Organization Studies43 (2): 247‐268.
117.
Tirosh-SamuelsonH.HurlbutJ. B.. 2016. “Introduction: Technology, Utopianism and Eschatology.” In Perfecting Human Futures: Transhuman Visions and Technological Imaginations, edited by HurlbutJ. B.Tirosh-SamuelsonH., 1‐32. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS.
WehL.2020. Futures Scenarios as Tools of Participatory Science Communication: Theoretical Review and Application to Sustainability Research. [Master's Thesis, Freie Universität Berlin].
125.
WhyteJ.ComiA.MoscaL.. 2022. “Making Futures That Matter: Future Making, Online Working and Organizing Remotely.” Organization Theory3 (1): 26317877211069138.
126.
WilkieA.2018. “Speculating.” In Routledge Handbook of Interdisciplinary Research Methods, edited by LuryC.FenshamR.Heller-NicholasA.LammesS.LastA.MichaelM.UprichardE., 347‐351. London, England: Routledge.
127.
WilligC.2014. “Interpretation and Analysis.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, edited by FlickU., 136‐150.
128.
WinnerL.1983. “Technologies as Forms of Life.” In Epistemology, Methodology, and the Social Sciences, 249‐263.