Backcasting is a Futures method that starts with a preferred future and works back to the present, identifying actions over time needed to achieve the preferred future. But there are few specifics in the Backcasting literature on how to develop the pathway that connects a preferred future to the present. This article describes a participatory process for Backcasting that uses a structure similar to the Futures Wheel to develop the pathway from the preferred future back to the present. A case study of U.S. Forest Service organizational planning is used to illustrate the method.
BengstonD. N.2016. “The Futures Wheel: A Method for Exploring the Implications of Social-ecological Change.” Society & Natural Resources29 (3): 374–79. doi:10.1080/08941920.2015.1054980.
BezoldC.2009b. Using Vision in Futures (CD-ROM), In Futures Research Methodology—Version 3.0, edited by GlennJerome C.GordonTheodore J.The Millennium Project.
6.
BishopP.HinesA.2012. “Visioning.” In Teaching about the Future, Chapter 9, 236-251. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
CorbinJ.StraussA.2014. Basics of Qualitative Research. 4th ed.Thousand Oaks: Sage.
8.
CostanzaRobertKubiszewskiIda. 2014. “Why We Need Visions of a Sustainable and Desirable World.” In Creating A Sustainable and Desirable Future: Insights from 45 Global thought Leaders, edited by CostanzaR.KubiszewskiI., 3–8. Singapore: World Scientific.
9.
HinesA.BengstonD. N.DockryM. J. (compilers). 2019. “The Forest Futures Horizon Scanning Project.” Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-187. Newtown Square: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/57939.
10.
HinesA.SchutteJ.RomeroM.BengstonD. N.2019. “Scenarios to Provide Context for Horizon Scanning: Backcasting North American Forest Futures from 2090 to 2035.” In The Forest Futures Horizon Scanning Project. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-.187, edited by HinesA.BengstonD. N.DockryM. J. comps, 49–61. Newtown Square: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/57948.
11.
KruegerR. A.CaseyM. A.2000. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. 3rd ed.Thousand Oaks: Sage.
12.
LippittL. L.1998. Preferred Futuring: Envision the Future You Want and Unleash the Energy to Get There. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
13.
LovinsA.1976. “Energy Strategy: The Road Not Taken?” Foreign Affairs55:63–96.
14.
LovinsA.1977. Soft Energy Paths: Toward a Durable Peace. Cambridge: Friends of the Earth/Ballinger.
PageS. E.2007. The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
17.
PolakF.1973. The Image of the Future. Translated and abridged by BouldingElise. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18.
QuistJ.VergragtP.2006. “Past and Future of Backcasting: The Shift to Stakeholder Participation and a Proposal for a Methodological Framework.” Futures38:1027–45.
19.
RobinsonJ.1982. “Energy Backcasting: A Proposed Method of Policy Analysis.” Energy Policy10:337–44.
20.
ShahJ. J.KulkarniS. V.Vargas-HernandezN.2000. “Evaluation of Idea Generation Methods for Conceptual Design: Effectiveness Metrics and Design of Experiments.” Journal of Mechanical Design122 (4): 377–84. doi:10.1115/1.1315592.
21.
SorokaS.FournierP.NirL.2019. “Cross-national Evidence of a Negativity Bias in Psychophysiological Reactions to News.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America116 (38): 18888–92. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908369116
