Abstract
Background
Olfactory dysfunction (OD) is both under-recognized and underdiagnosed in aging adults. Prior studies in chronic rhinosinusitis have demonstrated a correlation between the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders-Negative Statements (QOD-NS) and psychophysical olfactory testing, indicating potential utility for screening in this group. This study examined the correlation between QOD-NS scores, psychophysical function, and olfactory-associated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in a novel, aging population. Additionally, we examined the potential utility of the QOD-NS as a screening instrument in this population.
Methods
Prospective cohort study in which healthy, adult volunteers completed the QOD-NS, olfaction-related visual analog scale (VAS) questions, Sniffin’ Sticks (TDI), De Jong Giervald Loneliness Scale, UCLA loneliness survey (UCLA), and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9).
Results
Two-hundred and twenty-eight adults with mean age 50.3 ± 17.7 years were included. Subjects ≥50 years old had higher prevalences of hyposmia (58.3% vs 19.8%, P < 0.001) and anosmia (9.1% vs 3.1%, P < 0.001), and had worse QOD-NS and VAS (P < 0.001 for both). Aging subjects had significant correlations between QOD-NS and TDI (r = –0.386, p < 0.001), all VAS scores (P < 0.001), PHQ9 (r = 0.283, P = 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated a QOD-NS of 8.0 as the optimal cutoff for a Youden's index of 0.23 for detection of dysosmia in aging patients.
Conclusions
The QOD-NS has significant, although weak correlation with psychophysical testing and psychosocial PROMs in aging subjects. However, a low Youden Index suggests limited potential of the QOD-NS as an OD screening tool in this population.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
